You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Srabasti Banerjee <sr...@gmail.com> on 2025/12/09 04:36:27 UTC
[LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Hello All,
Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus on
criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
Discussion: https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with at
least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in the same
month.
The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
Thanks,
Srabasti Banerjee
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org>.
Great, good idea Daniel.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 12:57 PM Srabasti Banerjee <
srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> Appreciate your inputs Amogh, Jens, Wei, Jarek, Daniel!
>
> Thanks for clarifying Jarek! Yes, this was my first attempt at LAZY
> CONSENSUS, so good learning along the way here.
>
> Will start a different DISCUSS thread.
>
> Warm Regards,
> Srabasti Banerjee
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 12:37 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > Good idea :) - we have enough of formalising things recently ...
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 9:32 PM Daniel Standish via dev <
> > dev@airflow.apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I would suggest maybe we don't need to formalize criteria.
> > >
> > > Actually, let me suggest... let's just agree on a sort of mission
> > statement
> > > for the award.
> > >
> > > E.g. "to recognize meaningful contributions by new contributors" or
> > > something.
> > >
> > > Then people can apply that however it makes sense to them.
> > >
> > > And if we find that that isn't good enough, we can revisit.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 11:54 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just to be clear (because that might be not clear).
> > > >
> > > > LAZY CONSENSUS is generally broken when someone raises "I think it
> > should
> > > > be different". So the lazy consensus was broken when doubts were
> raised
> > > by
> > > > Amogh, Jens and Wei.
> > > > Based on that, I think you should start a new discussion -
> summarising
> > > the
> > > > learnings and likely trying to get to "actual" consensus iin the
> course
> > > of
> > > > that discussion (if not possible - that should end with the vote. or
> > > > dropping the idea if we can't converge to a good consensus.
> > > >
> > > > J.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 8:48 PM Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > > srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your inputs Wei! For your latest response below, my
> > concern
> > > is
> > > > > mandating the criteria to be at least 10 or 5 or 20 PRs to qualify
> to
> > > get
> > > > > nominated for Rookie PR, is too high a bar for new contributors.
> > Folks
> > > > will
> > > > > try to focus more on the number of PRs in a month, just to qualify,
> > > which
> > > > > might lead to low quality PR submissions.
> > > > > For a contributor who picks up a challenging PR, and provides a
> long
> > > term
> > > > > good quality solution with strategic design, it will be unfair.
> After
> > > > all,
> > > > > it takes time to make soup from raw ingredients when cooking:)
> > > > >
> > > > > Quality over quantity is preferred by the community I think, so we
> > > have a
> > > > > stable product. Please chime in all 👈.
> > > > > Every new contributor has their own personal choice. They will stay
> > as
> > > > long
> > > > > as they get support and recognition from the Airflow community.
> > > > >
> > > > > *Let's finalize the criteria for Rookie PR and get the ball
> rolling,
> > > > since
> > > > > the lazy consensus time has passed already! More awards are yet to
> > > start
> > > > > after this thread is locked in:)*
> > > > >
> > > > > Warm Regards,
> > > > > Srabasti Banerjee
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 1:15 AM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The 10 I meant was the minimum required to qualify. The main
> reason
> > > is
> > > > > > wanting to keep the newcomer for a bit longer. If this is too
> > > strict, 5
> > > > > > might also be a good choice.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Wei
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Dec 9, 2025, at 2:37 PM, Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > > > > srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same
> > > Rookie
> > > > > > > award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that
> > defeats
> > > > the
> > > > > > > criteria of recognizing new contributors, right?
> > > > > > > They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month,
> no
> > > > issues
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As per original thread, based on consensus from those who
> voted,
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > November PR thread, below were the numbers from first
> responses.
> > > > Hence
> > > > > > > chose the majority number 10.
> > > > > > > 10 PRs - Wei, Jen
> > > > > > > 20 PRs - Pierre
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put
> > it
> > > > here
> > > > > > > above, for clarity sake.
> > > > > > > New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so
> > far
> > > > > > whatever
> > > > > > > I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before
> > > voting
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the
> future.
> > We
> > > > can
> > > > > > > check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this
> > thread
> > > > to
> > > > > > > finalise the criteria and not the implementation here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from
> > everyone,
> > > > the
> > > > > > > better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the
> > community
> > > :)
> > > > > > > Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before
> > > > > finalizing
> > > > > > > on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Warm Regards,
> > > > > > > Srabasti Banerjee
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to
> > > > recognise
> > > > > > > other contributors using different criterias in the future, as
> > was
> > > > > > > discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread
> > is
> > > > only
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > the Rookie PRs.*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less
> > than
> > > > 10
> > > > > > PRs
> > > > > > >> (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't
> > > > appear
> > > > > in
> > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This
> > > might
> > > > > not
> > > > > > >> even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but
> > the
> > > > > > details
> > > > > > >> may require further discussion.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > > >> Wei
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <
> amoghdesai@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one
> time
> > > > award
> > > > > > per
> > > > > > >>> person?
> > > > > > >>> (Keeping the criteria in mind)
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > >>> Amogh Desai
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > > > > >>> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> Hello All,
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy
> > > > consensus
> > > > > on
> > > > > > >>>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
> > > > > > >>>> Discussion:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time
> > contributors
> > > > with
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > >>>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully
> > merged
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> same
> > > > > > >>>> month.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm
> > PST.
> > > > > > >>>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the
> consensus.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>> Srabasti Banerjee
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Srabasti Banerjee <sr...@gmail.com>.
Appreciate your inputs Amogh, Jens, Wei, Jarek, Daniel!
Thanks for clarifying Jarek! Yes, this was my first attempt at LAZY
CONSENSUS, so good learning along the way here.
Will start a different DISCUSS thread.
Warm Regards,
Srabasti Banerjee
On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 12:37 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Good idea :) - we have enough of formalising things recently ...
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 9:32 PM Daniel Standish via dev <
> dev@airflow.apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I would suggest maybe we don't need to formalize criteria.
> >
> > Actually, let me suggest... let's just agree on a sort of mission
> statement
> > for the award.
> >
> > E.g. "to recognize meaningful contributions by new contributors" or
> > something.
> >
> > Then people can apply that however it makes sense to them.
> >
> > And if we find that that isn't good enough, we can revisit.
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 11:54 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Just to be clear (because that might be not clear).
> > >
> > > LAZY CONSENSUS is generally broken when someone raises "I think it
> should
> > > be different". So the lazy consensus was broken when doubts were raised
> > by
> > > Amogh, Jens and Wei.
> > > Based on that, I think you should start a new discussion - summarising
> > the
> > > learnings and likely trying to get to "actual" consensus iin the course
> > of
> > > that discussion (if not possible - that should end with the vote. or
> > > dropping the idea if we can't converge to a good consensus.
> > >
> > > J.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 8:48 PM Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for your inputs Wei! For your latest response below, my
> concern
> > is
> > > > mandating the criteria to be at least 10 or 5 or 20 PRs to qualify to
> > get
> > > > nominated for Rookie PR, is too high a bar for new contributors.
> Folks
> > > will
> > > > try to focus more on the number of PRs in a month, just to qualify,
> > which
> > > > might lead to low quality PR submissions.
> > > > For a contributor who picks up a challenging PR, and provides a long
> > term
> > > > good quality solution with strategic design, it will be unfair. After
> > > all,
> > > > it takes time to make soup from raw ingredients when cooking:)
> > > >
> > > > Quality over quantity is preferred by the community I think, so we
> > have a
> > > > stable product. Please chime in all 👈.
> > > > Every new contributor has their own personal choice. They will stay
> as
> > > long
> > > > as they get support and recognition from the Airflow community.
> > > >
> > > > *Let's finalize the criteria for Rookie PR and get the ball rolling,
> > > since
> > > > the lazy consensus time has passed already! More awards are yet to
> > start
> > > > after this thread is locked in:)*
> > > >
> > > > Warm Regards,
> > > > Srabasti Banerjee
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 1:15 AM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The 10 I meant was the minimum required to qualify. The main reason
> > is
> > > > > wanting to keep the newcomer for a bit longer. If this is too
> > strict, 5
> > > > > might also be a good choice.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Wei
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Dec 9, 2025, at 2:37 PM, Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > > > srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same
> > Rookie
> > > > > > award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that
> defeats
> > > the
> > > > > > criteria of recognizing new contributors, right?
> > > > > > They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month, no
> > > issues
> > > > > on
> > > > > > that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As per original thread, based on consensus from those who voted,
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > > > November PR thread, below were the numbers from first responses.
> > > Hence
> > > > > > chose the majority number 10.
> > > > > > 10 PRs - Wei, Jen
> > > > > > 20 PRs - Pierre
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put
> it
> > > here
> > > > > > above, for clarity sake.
> > > > > > New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so
> far
> > > > > whatever
> > > > > > I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before
> > voting
> > > > and
> > > > > > deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the future.
> We
> > > can
> > > > > > check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this
> thread
> > > to
> > > > > > finalise the criteria and not the implementation here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from
> everyone,
> > > the
> > > > > > better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the
> community
> > :)
> > > > > > Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before
> > > > finalizing
> > > > > > on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Warm Regards,
> > > > > > Srabasti Banerjee
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to
> > > recognise
> > > > > > other contributors using different criterias in the future, as
> was
> > > > > > discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread
> is
> > > only
> > > > > for
> > > > > > the Rookie PRs.*
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less
> than
> > > 10
> > > > > PRs
> > > > > >> (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't
> > > appear
> > > > in
> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This
> > might
> > > > not
> > > > > >> even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but
> the
> > > > > details
> > > > > >> may require further discussion.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > >> Wei
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <amoghdesai@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time
> > > award
> > > > > per
> > > > > >>> person?
> > > > > >>> (Keeping the criteria in mind)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > >>> Amogh Desai
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > > > >>> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Hello All,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy
> > > consensus
> > > > on
> > > > > >>>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
> > > > > >>>> Discussion:
> > > > > >>>>
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time
> contributors
> > > with
> > > > > at
> > > > > >>>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully
> merged
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > >> same
> > > > > >>>> month.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm
> PST.
> > > > > >>>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>> Srabasti Banerjee
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Good idea :) - we have enough of formalising things recently ...
On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 9:32 PM Daniel Standish via dev <
dev@airflow.apache.org> wrote:
> I would suggest maybe we don't need to formalize criteria.
>
> Actually, let me suggest... let's just agree on a sort of mission statement
> for the award.
>
> E.g. "to recognize meaningful contributions by new contributors" or
> something.
>
> Then people can apply that however it makes sense to them.
>
> And if we find that that isn't good enough, we can revisit.
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 11:54 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > Just to be clear (because that might be not clear).
> >
> > LAZY CONSENSUS is generally broken when someone raises "I think it should
> > be different". So the lazy consensus was broken when doubts were raised
> by
> > Amogh, Jens and Wei.
> > Based on that, I think you should start a new discussion - summarising
> the
> > learnings and likely trying to get to "actual" consensus iin the course
> of
> > that discussion (if not possible - that should end with the vote. or
> > dropping the idea if we can't converge to a good consensus.
> >
> > J.
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 8:48 PM Srabasti Banerjee <
> > srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for your inputs Wei! For your latest response below, my concern
> is
> > > mandating the criteria to be at least 10 or 5 or 20 PRs to qualify to
> get
> > > nominated for Rookie PR, is too high a bar for new contributors. Folks
> > will
> > > try to focus more on the number of PRs in a month, just to qualify,
> which
> > > might lead to low quality PR submissions.
> > > For a contributor who picks up a challenging PR, and provides a long
> term
> > > good quality solution with strategic design, it will be unfair. After
> > all,
> > > it takes time to make soup from raw ingredients when cooking:)
> > >
> > > Quality over quantity is preferred by the community I think, so we
> have a
> > > stable product. Please chime in all 👈.
> > > Every new contributor has their own personal choice. They will stay as
> > long
> > > as they get support and recognition from the Airflow community.
> > >
> > > *Let's finalize the criteria for Rookie PR and get the ball rolling,
> > since
> > > the lazy consensus time has passed already! More awards are yet to
> start
> > > after this thread is locked in:)*
> > >
> > > Warm Regards,
> > > Srabasti Banerjee
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 1:15 AM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The 10 I meant was the minimum required to qualify. The main reason
> is
> > > > wanting to keep the newcomer for a bit longer. If this is too
> strict, 5
> > > > might also be a good choice.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Wei
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 9, 2025, at 2:37 PM, Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > > srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same
> Rookie
> > > > > award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that defeats
> > the
> > > > > criteria of recognizing new contributors, right?
> > > > > They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month, no
> > issues
> > > > on
> > > > > that.
> > > > >
> > > > > As per original thread, based on consensus from those who voted,
> and
> > > the
> > > > > November PR thread, below were the numbers from first responses.
> > Hence
> > > > > chose the majority number 10.
> > > > > 10 PRs - Wei, Jen
> > > > > 20 PRs - Pierre
> > > > >
> > > > > At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put it
> > here
> > > > > above, for clarity sake.
> > > > > New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so far
> > > > whatever
> > > > > I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before
> voting
> > > and
> > > > > deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the future. We
> > can
> > > > > check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this thread
> > to
> > > > > finalise the criteria and not the implementation here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from everyone,
> > the
> > > > > better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the community
> :)
> > > > > Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before
> > > finalizing
> > > > > on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday!
> > > > >
> > > > > Warm Regards,
> > > > > Srabasti Banerjee
> > > > >
> > > > > *Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to
> > recognise
> > > > > other contributors using different criterias in the future, as was
> > > > > discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread is
> > only
> > > > for
> > > > > the Rookie PRs.*
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less than
> > 10
> > > > PRs
> > > > >> (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't
> > appear
> > > in
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This
> might
> > > not
> > > > >> even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but the
> > > > details
> > > > >> may require further discussion.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> Wei
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time
> > award
> > > > per
> > > > >>> person?
> > > > >>> (Keeping the criteria in mind)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks & Regards,
> > > > >>> Amogh Desai
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > > >>> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Hello All,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy
> > consensus
> > > on
> > > > >>>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
> > > > >>>> Discussion:
> > > > >>>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors
> > with
> > > > at
> > > > >>>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged
> in
> > > the
> > > > >> same
> > > > >>>> month.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
> > > > >>>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>> Srabasti Banerjee
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Daniel Standish via dev <de...@airflow.apache.org>.
I would suggest maybe we don't need to formalize criteria.
Actually, let me suggest... let's just agree on a sort of mission statement
for the award.
E.g. "to recognize meaningful contributions by new contributors" or
something.
Then people can apply that however it makes sense to them.
And if we find that that isn't good enough, we can revisit.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 11:54 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Just to be clear (because that might be not clear).
>
> LAZY CONSENSUS is generally broken when someone raises "I think it should
> be different". So the lazy consensus was broken when doubts were raised by
> Amogh, Jens and Wei.
> Based on that, I think you should start a new discussion - summarising the
> learnings and likely trying to get to "actual" consensus iin the course of
> that discussion (if not possible - that should end with the vote. or
> dropping the idea if we can't converge to a good consensus.
>
> J.
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 8:48 PM Srabasti Banerjee <
> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your inputs Wei! For your latest response below, my concern is
> > mandating the criteria to be at least 10 or 5 or 20 PRs to qualify to get
> > nominated for Rookie PR, is too high a bar for new contributors. Folks
> will
> > try to focus more on the number of PRs in a month, just to qualify, which
> > might lead to low quality PR submissions.
> > For a contributor who picks up a challenging PR, and provides a long term
> > good quality solution with strategic design, it will be unfair. After
> all,
> > it takes time to make soup from raw ingredients when cooking:)
> >
> > Quality over quantity is preferred by the community I think, so we have a
> > stable product. Please chime in all 👈.
> > Every new contributor has their own personal choice. They will stay as
> long
> > as they get support and recognition from the Airflow community.
> >
> > *Let's finalize the criteria for Rookie PR and get the ball rolling,
> since
> > the lazy consensus time has passed already! More awards are yet to start
> > after this thread is locked in:)*
> >
> > Warm Regards,
> > Srabasti Banerjee
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 1:15 AM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The 10 I meant was the minimum required to qualify. The main reason is
> > > wanting to keep the newcomer for a bit longer. If this is too strict, 5
> > > might also be a good choice.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Wei
> > >
> > > > On Dec 9, 2025, at 2:37 PM, Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same Rookie
> > > > award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that defeats
> the
> > > > criteria of recognizing new contributors, right?
> > > > They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month, no
> issues
> > > on
> > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > As per original thread, based on consensus from those who voted, and
> > the
> > > > November PR thread, below were the numbers from first responses.
> Hence
> > > > chose the majority number 10.
> > > > 10 PRs - Wei, Jen
> > > > 20 PRs - Pierre
> > > >
> > > > At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put it
> here
> > > > above, for clarity sake.
> > > > New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so far
> > > whatever
> > > > I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before voting
> > and
> > > > deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the future. We
> can
> > > > check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this thread
> to
> > > > finalise the criteria and not the implementation here.
> > > >
> > > > Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from everyone,
> the
> > > > better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the community :)
> > > > Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before
> > finalizing
> > > > on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday!
> > > >
> > > > Warm Regards,
> > > > Srabasti Banerjee
> > > >
> > > > *Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to
> recognise
> > > > other contributors using different criterias in the future, as was
> > > > discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread is
> only
> > > for
> > > > the Rookie PRs.*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less than
> 10
> > > PRs
> > > >> (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't
> appear
> > in
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This might
> > not
> > > >> even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but the
> > > details
> > > >> may require further discussion.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Wei
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time
> award
> > > per
> > > >>> person?
> > > >>> (Keeping the criteria in mind)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks & Regards,
> > > >>> Amogh Desai
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
> > > >>> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hello All,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy
> consensus
> > on
> > > >>>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
> > > >>>> Discussion:
> > > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors
> with
> > > at
> > > >>>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in
> > the
> > > >> same
> > > >>>> month.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
> > > >>>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>> Srabasti Banerjee
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Just to be clear (because that might be not clear).
LAZY CONSENSUS is generally broken when someone raises "I think it should
be different". So the lazy consensus was broken when doubts were raised by
Amogh, Jens and Wei.
Based on that, I think you should start a new discussion - summarising the
learnings and likely trying to get to "actual" consensus iin the course of
that discussion (if not possible - that should end with the vote. or
dropping the idea if we can't converge to a good consensus.
J.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 8:48 PM Srabasti Banerjee <
srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your inputs Wei! For your latest response below, my concern is
> mandating the criteria to be at least 10 or 5 or 20 PRs to qualify to get
> nominated for Rookie PR, is too high a bar for new contributors. Folks will
> try to focus more on the number of PRs in a month, just to qualify, which
> might lead to low quality PR submissions.
> For a contributor who picks up a challenging PR, and provides a long term
> good quality solution with strategic design, it will be unfair. After all,
> it takes time to make soup from raw ingredients when cooking:)
>
> Quality over quantity is preferred by the community I think, so we have a
> stable product. Please chime in all 👈.
> Every new contributor has their own personal choice. They will stay as long
> as they get support and recognition from the Airflow community.
>
> *Let's finalize the criteria for Rookie PR and get the ball rolling, since
> the lazy consensus time has passed already! More awards are yet to start
> after this thread is locked in:)*
>
> Warm Regards,
> Srabasti Banerjee
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 1:15 AM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The 10 I meant was the minimum required to qualify. The main reason is
> > wanting to keep the newcomer for a bit longer. If this is too strict, 5
> > might also be a good choice.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Dec 9, 2025, at 2:37 PM, Srabasti Banerjee <
> > srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same Rookie
> > > award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that defeats the
> > > criteria of recognizing new contributors, right?
> > > They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month, no issues
> > on
> > > that.
> > >
> > > As per original thread, based on consensus from those who voted, and
> the
> > > November PR thread, below were the numbers from first responses. Hence
> > > chose the majority number 10.
> > > 10 PRs - Wei, Jen
> > > 20 PRs - Pierre
> > >
> > > At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put it here
> > > above, for clarity sake.
> > > New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so far
> > whatever
> > > I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before voting
> and
> > > deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the future. We can
> > > check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this thread to
> > > finalise the criteria and not the implementation here.
> > >
> > > Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from everyone, the
> > > better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the community :)
> > > Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before
> finalizing
> > > on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday!
> > >
> > > Warm Regards,
> > > Srabasti Banerjee
> > >
> > > *Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to recognise
> > > other contributors using different criterias in the future, as was
> > > discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread is only
> > for
> > > the Rookie PRs.*
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10
> > PRs
> > >> (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't appear
> in
> > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This might
> not
> > >> even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but the
> > details
> > >> may require further discussion.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Wei
> > >>
> > >>> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time award
> > per
> > >>> person?
> > >>> (Keeping the criteria in mind)
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks & Regards,
> > >>> Amogh Desai
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
> > >>> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hello All,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus
> on
> > >>>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
> > >>>> Discussion:
> > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with
> > at
> > >>>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in
> the
> > >> same
> > >>>> month.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
> > >>>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Srabasti Banerjee
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Srabasti Banerjee <sr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for your inputs Wei! For your latest response below, my concern is
mandating the criteria to be at least 10 or 5 or 20 PRs to qualify to get
nominated for Rookie PR, is too high a bar for new contributors. Folks will
try to focus more on the number of PRs in a month, just to qualify, which
might lead to low quality PR submissions.
For a contributor who picks up a challenging PR, and provides a long term
good quality solution with strategic design, it will be unfair. After all,
it takes time to make soup from raw ingredients when cooking:)
Quality over quantity is preferred by the community I think, so we have a
stable product. Please chime in all 👈.
Every new contributor has their own personal choice. They will stay as long
as they get support and recognition from the Airflow community.
*Let's finalize the criteria for Rookie PR and get the ball rolling, since
the lazy consensus time has passed already! More awards are yet to start
after this thread is locked in:)*
Warm Regards,
Srabasti Banerjee
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 1:15 AM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The 10 I meant was the minimum required to qualify. The main reason is
> wanting to keep the newcomer for a bit longer. If this is too strict, 5
> might also be a good choice.
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Dec 9, 2025, at 2:37 PM, Srabasti Banerjee <
> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same Rookie
> > award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that defeats the
> > criteria of recognizing new contributors, right?
> > They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month, no issues
> on
> > that.
> >
> > As per original thread, based on consensus from those who voted, and the
> > November PR thread, below were the numbers from first responses. Hence
> > chose the majority number 10.
> > 10 PRs - Wei, Jen
> > 20 PRs - Pierre
> >
> > At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put it here
> > above, for clarity sake.
> > New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so far
> whatever
> > I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before voting and
> > deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the future. We can
> > check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this thread to
> > finalise the criteria and not the implementation here.
> >
> > Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from everyone, the
> > better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the community :)
> > Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before finalizing
> > on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday!
> >
> > Warm Regards,
> > Srabasti Banerjee
> >
> > *Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to recognise
> > other contributors using different criterias in the future, as was
> > discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread is only
> for
> > the Rookie PRs.*
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10
> PRs
> >> (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't appear in
> >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This might not
> >> even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but the
> details
> >> may require further discussion.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Wei
> >>
> >>> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time award
> per
> >>> person?
> >>> (Keeping the criteria in mind)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks & Regards,
> >>> Amogh Desai
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
> >>> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello All,
> >>>>
> >>>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus on
> >>>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
> >>>> Discussion:
> >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
> >>>>
> >>>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with
> at
> >>>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in the
> >> same
> >>>> month.
> >>>>
> >>>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
> >>>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Srabasti Banerjee
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
>
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>.
The 10 I meant was the minimum required to qualify. The main reason is wanting to keep the newcomer for a bit longer. If this is too strict, 5 might also be a good choice.
Best,
Wei
> On Dec 9, 2025, at 2:37 PM, Srabasti Banerjee <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same Rookie
> award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that defeats the
> criteria of recognizing new contributors, right?
> They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month, no issues on
> that.
>
> As per original thread, based on consensus from those who voted, and the
> November PR thread, below were the numbers from first responses. Hence
> chose the majority number 10.
> 10 PRs - Wei, Jen
> 20 PRs - Pierre
>
> At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put it here
> above, for clarity sake.
> New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so far whatever
> I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before voting and
> deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the future. We can
> check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this thread to
> finalise the criteria and not the implementation here.
>
> Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from everyone, the
> better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the community :)
> Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before finalizing
> on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday!
>
> Warm Regards,
> Srabasti Banerjee
>
> *Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to recognise
> other contributors using different criterias in the future, as was
> discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread is only for
> the Rookie PRs.*
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs
>> (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't appear in
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This might not
>> even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but the details
>> may require further discussion.
>>
>> Best,
>> Wei
>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time award per
>>> person?
>>> (Keeping the criteria in mind)
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>> Amogh Desai
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
>>> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus on
>>>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
>>>> Discussion:
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
>>>>
>>>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with at
>>>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in the
>> same
>>>> month.
>>>>
>>>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
>>>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Srabasti Banerjee
>>>>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Srabasti Banerjee <sr...@gmail.com>.
Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same Rookie
award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that defeats the
criteria of recognizing new contributors, right?
They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month, no issues on
that.
As per original thread, based on consensus from those who voted, and the
November PR thread, below were the numbers from first responses. Hence
chose the majority number 10.
10 PRs - Wei, Jen
20 PRs - Pierre
At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put it here
above, for clarity sake.
New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so far whatever
I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before voting and
deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the future. We can
check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this thread to
finalise the criteria and not the implementation here.
Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from everyone, the
better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the community :)
Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before finalizing
on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday!
Warm Regards,
Srabasti Banerjee
*Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to recognise
other contributors using different criterias in the future, as was
discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread is only for
the Rookie PRs.*
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs
> (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't appear in
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This might not
> even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but the details
> may require further discussion.
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time award per
> > person?
> > (Keeping the criteria in mind)
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Amogh Desai
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
> > srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus on
> >> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
> >> Discussion:
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
> >>
> >> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with at
> >> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in the
> same
> >> month.
> >>
> >> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
> >> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Srabasti Banerjee
> >>
>
>
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>.
I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't appear in https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This might not even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but the details may require further discussion.
Best,
Wei
> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time award per
> person?
> (Keeping the criteria in mind)
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus on
>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
>> Discussion:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
>>
>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with at
>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in the same
>> month.
>>
>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Srabasti Banerjee
>>
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Jens Scheffler <js...@apache.org>.
From what I see you can (in theory) also win the rookie award up to 9
times if you make it "right". But this is OK for me. As long as you are
below 10 PRs
On 12/9/25 06:35, Amogh Desai wrote:
> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time award per
> person?
> (Keeping the criteria in mind)
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
> srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus on
>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
>> Discussion:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
>>
>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with at
>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in the same
>> month.
>>
>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Srabasti Banerjee
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Criteria to determine Rookie PR of the Month Award
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org>.
Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time award per
person?
(Keeping the criteria in mind)
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee <
srabasti.banerjee.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus on
> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month:
> Discussion:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm
>
> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with at
> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in the same
> month.
>
> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST.
> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus.
>
> Thanks,
> Srabasti Banerjee
>