Test organization

[Glen Daniels <gd...@macromedia.com>]

Can I make a restructuring suggestion for the tests?

In particular, I'd like to put forward the idea that we move all the
wsdl-related tests into test.wsdl.*.

There are two reasons for this.  First, the top-level test directory is
getting somewhat cluttered.  Second, if you use an IDE (as many of us do),
the test area won't build correctly outside the context of an ant build
because of all the stub generation that needs to happen.  It's possible to
exclude certain directories from the build, but each time a new test dir
which uses wsdl appears at the top level, you need to go do that again.
Moving them down into wsdl/ would enable us to just exclude that one
directory and be done with it, centralizing all the tests which use
generated code.

Thoughts?

--Glen

Re: Test organization

[Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>]

Glen Daniels wrote:

> Can I make a restructuring suggestion for the tests?
> 
> In particular, I'd like to put forward the idea that we move all the
> wsdl-related tests into test.wsdl.*.
> 
> There are two reasons for this.  First, the top-level test directory is
> getting somewhat cluttered.  Second, if you use an IDE (as many of us do),
> the test area won't build correctly outside the context of an ant build
> because of all the stub generation that needs to happen.  It's possible to
> exclude certain directories from the build, but each time a new test dir
> which uses wsdl appears at the top level, you need to go do that again.
> Moving them down into wsdl/ would enable us to just exclude that one
> directory and be done with it, centralizing all the tests which use
> generated code.
> 
> Thoughts?


+1



-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
  deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                 - Benjamin Franklin