You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@weex.apache.org by 申远 <sh...@gmail.com> on 2019/10/24 09:35:59 UTC

Re: Weex, Apache and outside code

Thanks for @Myrle, @Jan, @Dan, @Willem and everyone else who has make
effort on this topic.

Weex-Loader [1]  and Weex-CLI [2] is a part of Apache Weex now. The problem
is solved, finally.

[1] https://github.com/apache/weex-loader
[2] https://github.com/apache/weex-cli

Best Regards,
YorkShen

申远


Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org> 于2019年3月9日周六 下午6:54写道:

> Going back through my mails, I realized I failed to answer one of your
> questions.  My apologies.
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 9:24 AM 申远 <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 1. If the corresponding code is owned by Alibaba, and someone represented
> > the company would sign the SGA, is there any necessary to have all the
> > contributors signed the SGA again?
> >
>
> I believe that would be sufficient, but you should ask the legal
> committee.  (See below.)
>
> 2. From my point of view, there will be lots of copyright  / trademark
> > issues around, as none of the PPMC member is lawyer, Is there anyone from
> > Apache we can consult about the law issue?
> >
>
> There is!  This is one of the services ASF provides for its projects.  You
> can email legal-discuss@apache.org or, if it's something that needs to be
> kept private legal-internal@apache.org.  You may prefer to submit a JIRA
> ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LEGAL)  You can get more
> information here: https://www.apache.org/legal/
>
>
> > 3. weex-toolkit is already an open source project under MIT license,
> would
> > it violate any copyright  / trademark rules/laws if we fork the original
> > weex-toolkit and push it to Apache repos.
> >
>
> I believe it would be allowed, because the MIT license is a category A
> license.  But I suggest you ask someone with more legal know-how (see
> above).  It may not accomplish your purposes unless you convince the
> developers there to start doing their work here.  If they were to continue
> working over there, it would be problematic because the Weex PMC wouldn't
> be able to participate in decisions about who commits or what they commit.
>
> Best Regards,
> Myrle
>