You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> on 2008/03/09 21:22:33 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Hi all,
I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my
p.a.oaccount:
Distribution:
http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/
M2 Repo:
http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/
RAT log file:
http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat
The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS
As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
- "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x)
- "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of form,
ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari)
- Checked the RAT log
[ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
[ ] Don't release, because...
Thank you in advance,
Frank Bille
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
The vote has passed with 6 binding +1 and 1 non-binding +1.
I will upload to mirroring system and in 24 hours we can announce it.
Speaking of which, I have prepared the release notes[0], if anyone wants to
verify them.
Thank you all for taking time to verify this release
Frank
[0]: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-132.html
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my p.a.oaccount:
>
> Distribution:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/
>
> M2 Repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/
>
> RAT log file:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat
>
> The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS
>
> As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
>
> - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x)
> - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of
> form, ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari)
> - Checked the RAT log
>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Frank Bille
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
[x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
-igor
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Gerolf Seitz <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my
> p.a.oaccount:
>
> Distribution:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/>
>
> M2 Repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/>
>
> RAT log file:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat>
>
> The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS
>
> As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
>
> - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x)
> - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of form,
> ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari)
> - Checked the RAT log
>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Frank Bille
>
AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de>.
Thank you, it's so easy, as you wrote. My browser seems to have a problem with his cache. He does not find the file. On another computer it works. Sorry for my confusing emails.
Stefan
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dashorst@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 11:16
An: dev@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
It is already there. You only need to browse the maven repo. Why is
that so hard?
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3.1/wicket-1.3.1-javadoc.jar
Or even better: mvn eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadSources=true will do
that automatically for you.
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> I did not mean "include it into the wicket download-zip". I think of providing a separate file, just the documentation. I think it would be not a great effort to change the build file.
>
> Stefan
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dashorst@gmail.com]
>
> Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 10:40
>
> An: dev@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3.1/wicket-1.3.1-javadoc.jar
>
> Adding this to the download triples the download size which is not
> very friendly.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> > Of course this is done through maven but If I download a new distribution (as a simple developer who uses wicket) I have to build the javadoc by myself (i need maven to install etc). Wouldn't it be nice to have a precompiled javadoc.jar?
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dashorst@gmail.com]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 09:46
> > An: dev@wicket.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> >
> >
> > That is done through maven.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> > > +1 for releasing it
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to pack a javadoc.jar within the distribution, od
> > > to distribute a separate javadoc.jar file?
> > >
> > >
> > > Stefan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
It is already there. You only need to browse the maven repo. Why is
that so hard?
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3.1/wicket-1.3.1-javadoc.jar
Or even better: mvn eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadSources=true will do
that automatically for you.
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> I did not mean "include it into the wicket download-zip". I think of providing a separate file, just the documentation. I think it would be not a great effort to change the build file.
>
> Stefan
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dashorst@gmail.com]
>
> Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 10:40
>
> An: dev@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3.1/wicket-1.3.1-javadoc.jar
>
> Adding this to the download triples the download size which is not
> very friendly.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> > Of course this is done through maven but If I download a new distribution (as a simple developer who uses wicket) I have to build the javadoc by myself (i need maven to install etc). Wouldn't it be nice to have a precompiled javadoc.jar?
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dashorst@gmail.com]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 09:46
> > An: dev@wicket.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> >
> >
> > That is done through maven.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> > > +1 for releasing it
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to pack a javadoc.jar within the distribution, od
> > > to distribute a separate javadoc.jar file?
> > >
> > >
> > > Stefan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de>.
I did not mean "include it into the wicket download-zip". I think of providing a separate file, just the documentation. I think it would be not a great effort to change the build file.
Stefan
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dashorst@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 10:40
An: dev@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3.1/wicket-1.3.1-javadoc.jar
Adding this to the download triples the download size which is not
very friendly.
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> Of course this is done through maven but If I download a new distribution (as a simple developer who uses wicket) I have to build the javadoc by myself (i need maven to install etc). Wouldn't it be nice to have a precompiled javadoc.jar?
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dashorst@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 09:46
> An: dev@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
>
>
> That is done through maven.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> > +1 for releasing it
> >
> > Would it be possible to pack a javadoc.jar within the distribution, od
> > to distribute a separate javadoc.jar file?
> >
> >
> > Stefan
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3.1/wicket-1.3.1-javadoc.jar
Adding this to the download triples the download size which is not
very friendly.
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> Of course this is done through maven but If I download a new distribution (as a simple developer who uses wicket) I have to build the javadoc by myself (i need maven to install etc). Wouldn't it be nice to have a precompiled javadoc.jar?
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dashorst@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 09:46
> An: dev@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
>
>
> That is done through maven.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> > +1 for releasing it
> >
> > Would it be possible to pack a javadoc.jar within the distribution, od
> > to distribute a separate javadoc.jar file?
> >
> >
> > Stefan
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de>.
Of course this is done through maven but If I download a new distribution (as a simple developer who uses wicket) I have to build the javadoc by myself (i need maven to install etc). Wouldn't it be nice to have a precompiled javadoc.jar?
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dashorst@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 09:46
An: dev@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
That is done through maven.
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> +1 for releasing it
>
> Would it be possible to pack a javadoc.jar within the distribution, od
> to distribute a separate javadoc.jar file?
>
>
> Stefan
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
That is done through maven.
Martijn
On 3/10/08, Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de> wrote:
> +1 for releasing it
>
> Would it be possible to pack a javadoc.jar within the distribution, od
> to distribute a separate javadoc.jar file?
>
>
> Stefan
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Stefan Lindner <li...@visionet.de>.
+1 for releasing it
Would it be possible to pack a javadoc.jar within the distribution, od
to distribute a separate javadoc.jar file?
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
Looks fine to me +1 to release it
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my
> p.a.oaccount:
>
> Distribution:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/
>
> M2 Repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/
>
> RAT log file:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat
>
> The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS
>
> As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
>
> - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x)
> - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of form,
> ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari)
> - Checked the RAT log
>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Frank Bille
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:37 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Nevermind, I looked into it a bit further. I guess all of this stuff
> > was ironed out during incubation. How do you guys keep all of this
> > straight (Doug Lea's code, some Apache 1.1-licensed diff stuff, etc.)?
> > Do you do diffs of your RAT reports or something to make sure nothing
> > crazy sneaks in? I'm just curious.
> >
>
> The RAT report is just to check the final distribution as a last resort. I
> normally just read through it manually looking for something I haven't seen
> before.
>
> The reason why I don't take the rat report so so serious is that every
> project we release has an ApacheLicenceHeaderTest which, when running unit
> tests goes through the entire project and checks for license headers being
> correct. If they don't contain the apache license header and *should not*
> contain it it is documented in the test itself where the file is excluded
> and documented. So we have full control over the source files long before we
> release.
>
And we document anything needed in the NOTICE files as well, of course
Frank
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:37 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
wrote:
> Nevermind, I looked into it a bit further. I guess all of this stuff
> was ironed out during incubation. How do you guys keep all of this
> straight (Doug Lea's code, some Apache 1.1-licensed diff stuff, etc.)?
> Do you do diffs of your RAT reports or something to make sure nothing
> crazy sneaks in? I'm just curious.
>
The RAT report is just to check the final distribution as a last resort. I
normally just read through it manually looking for something I haven't seen
before.
The reason why I don't take the rat report so so serious is that every
project we release has an ApacheLicenceHeaderTest which, when running unit
tests goes through the entire project and checks for license headers being
correct. If they don't contain the apache license header and *should not*
contain it it is documented in the test itself where the file is excluded
and documented. So we have full control over the source files long before we
release.
Frank
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Nevermind, I looked into it a bit further. I guess all of this stuff
was ironed out during incubation. How do you guys keep all of this
straight (Doug Lea's code, some Apache 1.1-licensed diff stuff, etc.)?
Do you do diffs of your RAT reports or something to make sure nothing
crazy sneaks in? I'm just curious.
On 3/9/08, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Your RAT report shows JavaScript files without license headers.
> Shouldn't they have them?
>
>
> On 3/9/08, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my
> > p.a.oaccount:
> >
> > Distribution:
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/
> >
> > M2 Repo:
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/
> >
> > RAT log file:
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat
> >
> > The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS
> >
> > As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
> >
> > - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x)
> > - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of form,
> > ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari)
> > - Checked the RAT log
> >
> >
> > [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> > [ ] Don't release, because...
> >
> >
> > Thank you in advance,
> >
> > Frank Bille
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Your RAT report shows JavaScript files without license headers.
Shouldn't they have them?
On 3/9/08, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my
> p.a.oaccount:
>
> Distribution:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/
>
> M2 Repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/
>
> RAT log file:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat
>
> The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS
>
> As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
>
> - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x)
> - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of form,
> ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari)
> - Checked the RAT log
>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Frank Bille
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
+1
Eelco
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Any other votes? I do have 3 binding +1 if I count myself, but sure would
> like some more :-) I'l end this vote tonight at some point
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my p.a.oaccount:
> >
> > Distribution:
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/
> >
> > M2 Repo:
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/
> >
> > RAT log file:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat
> >
> > The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS
> >
> > As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
> >
> > - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x)
> > - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of
> > form, ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari)
> > - Checked the RAT log
> >
> >
> > [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> > [ ] Don't release, because...
> >
> >
> > Thank you in advance,
> > Frank Bille
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
Any other votes? I do have 3 binding +1 if I count myself, but sure would
like some more :-) I'l end this vote tonight at some point
Frank
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my p.a.oaccount:
>
> Distribution:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/
>
> M2 Repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/
>
> RAT log file:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat
>
> The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS
>
> As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
>
> - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x)
> - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of
> form, ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari)
> - Checked the RAT log
>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Frank Bille
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 3/9/08, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my
> p.a.oaccount:
>
> Distribution:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/
>
> M2 Repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/
>
> RAT log file:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat
>
> The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS
>
> As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
>
> - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x)
> - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of form,
> ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari)
> - Checked the RAT log
>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Frank Bille
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> [x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2
After having tested in a real-life application I think it's fine
Frank