You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> on 2023/07/31 11:05:24 UTC
snapshots repo cleanup
Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to clear
out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either add
clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the nightly jobs
can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
I would be fine with a wipe clean and restart. Just for the record.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:24 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Essentially just that there isnt disagreement about wiping it all
> (since it means some ancient stuff will go, and current stuff will be
> 'missing' for a small time until created again).
>
> Not unreasonable...besides, it's been a mess for several years, a
> couple days for gauging consensus doesn't really hurt hehe.
>
> It seems perhaps someone has been cleaning a little already though,
> perhaps tweaking the version-was-released cleanup, as some of the
> effectively-nothing-there junk within the wider clutter actually seems
> to have disappeared already.
>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 15:48, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I’m just saying it should be a no brainer. Old stuff on snapshot can
> go.
> >
> > I’m not sure what consensus infra is asking on the JIRA.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:12 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yep, committers can also manually do a deploy.
> > >
> > > Old snapshots are removed when the 'matching non-snapshot version' is
> > > released. Though it does still leave behind some metadata, so the
> > > related folders typically still all remain, making it a little harder
> > > to see what really is there. There are lots of these in the tree.
> > >
> > > Things that never actually get released for a variety of reasons
> > > currently stick around forever (e.g as the component was never
> > > actually released again, or a specific module went away before
> > > release, or the version number was changed between initial development
> > > and the eventual release, etc etc). There are also a variety of these
> > > in the tree as well.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 14:40, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1000
> > > >
> > > > the snapshot can also be deployed by anyone's laptop from a PMC
> member.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I thought there was an automatic rule to remove snapshots from ages
> > > > ago already. IMO This should be a no brainer on removing anything
> that
> > > > was deployed more than 3 months ago.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > if we need to wipe it clean and redeploy all current snapshots that
> > > > may be a good way to clean it up...
> > > >
> > > > the best way would be to have a rule removing any component (or
> > > > version) that didn't have an upload in more than 3 months.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:41 PM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The jobs set up on Jenkins do it, either as part of an overall
> build
> > > > > job or specifically just for snapshots.
> > > > >
> > > > > The various branch specific 5.x jobs do it as part of their overall
> > > > > process, they are under:
> > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/
> > > > >
> > > > > For Artemis there is just a specific snapshot deploy job for main
> at:
> > > > >
> > >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Artemis-SNAPSHOT-Deploy/
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 18:07, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have no objections, but I do have a question. What is pushing
> those
> > > > > > snapshots?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Justin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:02 PM Robbie Gemmell <
> > > robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first
> for
> > > a
> > > > > > > bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff
> to
> > > clear
> > > > > > > or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus
> > > poll:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of
> the
> > > > > > > snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh
> > > stuff?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing
> > > discussion
> > > > > > > otherwise.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Robbie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <
> > > robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra
> to
> > > clear
> > > > > > > > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > > > > > > > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that
> either
> > > add
> > > > > > > > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the
> > > nightly jobs
> > > > > > > > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> > >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
Essentially just that there isnt disagreement about wiping it all
(since it means some ancient stuff will go, and current stuff will be
'missing' for a small time until created again).
Not unreasonable...besides, it's been a mess for several years, a
couple days for gauging consensus doesn't really hurt hehe.
It seems perhaps someone has been cleaning a little already though,
perhaps tweaking the version-was-released cleanup, as some of the
effectively-nothing-there junk within the wider clutter actually seems
to have disappeared already.
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 15:48, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I’m just saying it should be a no brainer. Old stuff on snapshot can go.
>
> I’m not sure what consensus infra is asking on the JIRA.
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:12 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yep, committers can also manually do a deploy.
> >
> > Old snapshots are removed when the 'matching non-snapshot version' is
> > released. Though it does still leave behind some metadata, so the
> > related folders typically still all remain, making it a little harder
> > to see what really is there. There are lots of these in the tree.
> >
> > Things that never actually get released for a variety of reasons
> > currently stick around forever (e.g as the component was never
> > actually released again, or a specific module went away before
> > release, or the version number was changed between initial development
> > and the eventual release, etc etc). There are also a variety of these
> > in the tree as well.
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 14:40, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1000
> > >
> > > the snapshot can also be deployed by anyone's laptop from a PMC member.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I thought there was an automatic rule to remove snapshots from ages
> > > ago already. IMO This should be a no brainer on removing anything that
> > > was deployed more than 3 months ago.
> > >
> > >
> > > if we need to wipe it clean and redeploy all current snapshots that
> > > may be a good way to clean it up...
> > >
> > > the best way would be to have a rule removing any component (or
> > > version) that didn't have an upload in more than 3 months.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:41 PM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The jobs set up on Jenkins do it, either as part of an overall build
> > > > job or specifically just for snapshots.
> > > >
> > > > The various branch specific 5.x jobs do it as part of their overall
> > > > process, they are under:
> > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/
> > > >
> > > > For Artemis there is just a specific snapshot deploy job for main at:
> > > >
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Artemis-SNAPSHOT-Deploy/
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 18:07, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I have no objections, but I do have a question. What is pushing those
> > > > > snapshots?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Justin
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:02 PM Robbie Gemmell <
> > robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first for
> > a
> > > > > > bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff to
> > clear
> > > > > > or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus
> > poll:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of the
> > > > > > snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh
> > stuff?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing
> > discussion
> > > > > > otherwise.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Robbie
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <
> > robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to
> > clear
> > > > > > > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > > > > > > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either
> > add
> > > > > > > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the
> > nightly jobs
> > > > > > > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> >
> --
> Clebert Suconic
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
I’m just saying it should be a no brainer. Old stuff on snapshot can go.
I’m not sure what consensus infra is asking on the JIRA.
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:12 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yep, committers can also manually do a deploy.
>
> Old snapshots are removed when the 'matching non-snapshot version' is
> released. Though it does still leave behind some metadata, so the
> related folders typically still all remain, making it a little harder
> to see what really is there. There are lots of these in the tree.
>
> Things that never actually get released for a variety of reasons
> currently stick around forever (e.g as the component was never
> actually released again, or a specific module went away before
> release, or the version number was changed between initial development
> and the eventual release, etc etc). There are also a variety of these
> in the tree as well.
>
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 14:40, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1000
> >
> > the snapshot can also be deployed by anyone's laptop from a PMC member.
> >
> >
> >
> > I thought there was an automatic rule to remove snapshots from ages
> > ago already. IMO This should be a no brainer on removing anything that
> > was deployed more than 3 months ago.
> >
> >
> > if we need to wipe it clean and redeploy all current snapshots that
> > may be a good way to clean it up...
> >
> > the best way would be to have a rule removing any component (or
> > version) that didn't have an upload in more than 3 months.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:41 PM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > The jobs set up on Jenkins do it, either as part of an overall build
> > > job or specifically just for snapshots.
> > >
> > > The various branch specific 5.x jobs do it as part of their overall
> > > process, they are under:
> > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/
> > >
> > > For Artemis there is just a specific snapshot deploy job for main at:
> > >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Artemis-SNAPSHOT-Deploy/
> > >
> > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 18:07, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have no objections, but I do have a question. What is pushing those
> > > > snapshots?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Justin
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:02 PM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first for
> a
> > > > > bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff to
> clear
> > > > > or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus
> poll:
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of the
> > > > > snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh
> stuff?
> > > > >
> > > > > Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing
> discussion
> > > > > otherwise.
> > > > >
> > > > > Robbie
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to
> clear
> > > > > > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > > > > > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either
> add
> > > > > > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the
> nightly jobs
> > > > > > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
Yep, committers can also manually do a deploy.
Old snapshots are removed when the 'matching non-snapshot version' is
released. Though it does still leave behind some metadata, so the
related folders typically still all remain, making it a little harder
to see what really is there. There are lots of these in the tree.
Things that never actually get released for a variety of reasons
currently stick around forever (e.g as the component was never
actually released again, or a specific module went away before
release, or the version number was changed between initial development
and the eventual release, etc etc). There are also a variety of these
in the tree as well.
On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 14:40, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1000
>
> the snapshot can also be deployed by anyone's laptop from a PMC member.
>
>
>
> I thought there was an automatic rule to remove snapshots from ages
> ago already. IMO This should be a no brainer on removing anything that
> was deployed more than 3 months ago.
>
>
> if we need to wipe it clean and redeploy all current snapshots that
> may be a good way to clean it up...
>
> the best way would be to have a rule removing any component (or
> version) that didn't have an upload in more than 3 months.
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:41 PM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The jobs set up on Jenkins do it, either as part of an overall build
> > job or specifically just for snapshots.
> >
> > The various branch specific 5.x jobs do it as part of their overall
> > process, they are under:
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/
> >
> > For Artemis there is just a specific snapshot deploy job for main at:
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Artemis-SNAPSHOT-Deploy/
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 18:07, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have no objections, but I do have a question. What is pushing those
> > > snapshots?
> > >
> > >
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:02 PM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first for a
> > > > bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff to clear
> > > > or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus poll:
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of the
> > > > snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh stuff?
> > > >
> > > > Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing discussion
> > > > otherwise.
> > > >
> > > > Robbie
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to clear
> > > > > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > > > > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either add
> > > > > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the nightly jobs
> > > > > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1000
the snapshot can also be deployed by anyone's laptop from a PMC member.
I thought there was an automatic rule to remove snapshots from ages
ago already. IMO This should be a no brainer on removing anything that
was deployed more than 3 months ago.
if we need to wipe it clean and redeploy all current snapshots that
may be a good way to clean it up...
the best way would be to have a rule removing any component (or
version) that didn't have an upload in more than 3 months.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:41 PM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The jobs set up on Jenkins do it, either as part of an overall build
> job or specifically just for snapshots.
>
> The various branch specific 5.x jobs do it as part of their overall
> process, they are under:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/
>
> For Artemis there is just a specific snapshot deploy job for main at:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Artemis-SNAPSHOT-Deploy/
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 18:07, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I have no objections, but I do have a question. What is pushing those
> > snapshots?
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:02 PM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first for a
> > > bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff to clear
> > > or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus poll:
> > >
> > > Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of the
> > > snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh stuff?
> > >
> > > Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing discussion
> > > otherwise.
> > >
> > > Robbie
> > >
> > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to clear
> > > > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > > > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either add
> > > > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the nightly jobs
> > > > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
> > >
> > >
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
The jobs set up on Jenkins do it, either as part of an overall build
job or specifically just for snapshots.
The various branch specific 5.x jobs do it as part of their overall
process, they are under:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/
For Artemis there is just a specific snapshot deploy job for main at:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Artemis-SNAPSHOT-Deploy/
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 18:07, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I have no objections, but I do have a question. What is pushing those
> snapshots?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:02 PM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first for a
> > bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff to clear
> > or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus poll:
> >
> > Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of the
> > snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh stuff?
> >
> > Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing discussion
> > otherwise.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to clear
> > > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either add
> > > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the nightly jobs
> > > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
> >
> >
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
I have no objections, but I do have a question. What is pushing those
snapshots?
Justin
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:02 PM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first for a
> bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff to clear
> or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus poll:
>
> Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of the
> snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh stuff?
>
> Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing discussion
> otherwise.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to clear
> > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either add
> > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the nightly jobs
> > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
>
>
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
This has now been actioned, the snapshots repo was just cleared.
Also, in discussion a useful bit of info to know about the
repository.apache.org Nexus UI came up:
The Snapshots 'group' repository (the first one, in bold, in the
repository list) navigation tree offers the ability to delete
individual artifacts once you have fully expanded them. But..
The distinct Snapshots 'hosted' repository (the second one, further
down the repository list) navigation tree, actually offers the ability
to right click on directories in the tree and delete them rather than
having to expand individual artifact entries within them.
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 10:56, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With no objections being raised, I will ask Infra to proceed.
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 17:56, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first for a
> > bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff to clear
> > or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus poll:
> >
> > Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of the
> > snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh stuff?
> >
> > Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing discussion otherwise.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to clear
> > > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either add
> > > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the nightly jobs
> > > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
With no objections being raised, I will ask Infra to proceed.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 17:56, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first for a
> bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff to clear
> or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus poll:
>
> Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of the
> snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh stuff?
>
> Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing discussion otherwise.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to clear
> > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either add
> > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the nightly jobs
> > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
Re: snapshots repo cleanup
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
Infra have said they would be happier with PMC consensus first for a
bulk clear (which I suggested as picking out individual stuff to clear
or keep would be a nightmare), so lets go with a lazy consensus poll:
Does anyone object to bulk-clearing of the stale contents of the
snapshot repo, and having the CI jobs repopulating only fresh stuff?
Lets say lazy consensus will be assumed on Friday failing discussion otherwise.
Robbie
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi folks, just a note that I have raised a JIRA to ask Infra to clear
> out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either add
> clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the nightly jobs
> can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848