[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-6598) Kafka to support using ETCD beside Zookeeper

["Balint Molnar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16856770#comment-16856770 ] 

Balint Molnar commented on KAFKA-6598:
--------------------------------------

It's been more than a year since we are waiting for the KIP mentioned by [~cmccabe] I would like to know the status of that. 
Is that happening soon, or we can proceed somehow with this?

> Kafka to support using ETCD beside Zookeeper
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-6598
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6598
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: clients, core
>            Reporter: Sebastian Toader
>            Priority: Major
>
> The current Kafka implementation is bound to {{Zookeeper}} to store its metadata for forming a cluster of nodes (producer/consumer/broker). 
> As Kafka is becoming popular for streaming in various environments where {{Zookeeper}} is either not easy to deploy/manage or there are better alternatives to it there is a need 
> to run Kafka with other metastore implementation than {{Zookeeper}}.
> {{etcd}} can provide the same semantics as {{Zookeeper}} for Kafka and since {{etcd}} is the favorable choice in certain environments (e.g. Kubernetes) Kafka should be able to run with {{etcd}}.
> From the user's point of view should be straightforward to configure to use {{etcd}} by just simply specifying a connection string that point to {{etcd}} cluster.
> To avoid introducing instability the original interfaces should be kept and only the low level {{Zookeeper}} API calls should be replaced with \{{etcd}} API calls in case Kafka is configured 
> to use {{etcd}}.
> On the long run (which is out of scope of this jira) there should be an abstract layer in Kafka which then various metastore implementations would implement.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)