[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept donation of Rust Parquet implementation

[Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>]

With 6 binding +1 votes and 3 non-binding +1, the vote carries

I think we're just waiting on one last contributor CLA and then I can
kick off the IP clearance vote on general@incubator.a.o

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:24 AM Marco Neumann
<ma...@crepererum.net.invalid> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Happy to see this contribution :-)
>
> On December 1, 2018 12:50:49 AM GMT+01:00, Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Dear all,
> >
> >The developers of
> >
> >https://github.com/sunchao/parquet-rs
> >
> >have been in touch with Apache Arrow and Apache Parquet. Based on
> >mailing list discussions, it is being proposed to donate this Parquet
> >Rust implementation into the Apache Arrow codebase in order to develop
> >it together with the Arrow Rust implementation, for similar reasons
> >that we are co-developing the Arrow and Parquet C++ implementations.
> >Some of the same developers are involved in both projects.
> >
> >See https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3050
> >
> >It remains to be determined if the Parquet PMC will choose to make
> >separate Rust Parquet releases. This action does not close off that
> >path, and is more about helping the Rust developers to be productive
> >working on these projects.
> >
> >Parquet had previously voted to accept the code donation, but the
> >effort stalled out earlier this year (in part due to my lack of
> >bandwidth, since I had been offering to help steward the donation
> >there).
> >
> >This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of accepting
> >this donation. If the vote passes, the PMC and the authors of the code
> >will work together to complete the ASF IP Clearance process
> >(http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/) and import the Rust
> >implementation into the Arrow codebase.
> >
> >    [ ] +1 : Accept contribution of Rust implementation
> >    [ ]  0 : No opinion
> >    [ ] -1 : Reject contribution because...
> >
> >Here is my vote: +1
> >
> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Wes