You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/27 22:41:23 UTC
JSF 1.2 branch of Trinidad
(Re-sending; it bounced the first time)
My bosses at work are starting to request a JSF 1.2-based version
of Trinidad, so I'd like to get started on that. What I'm thinking of:
- A branch off the trunk (not on trunk)
- Depending on the 1.2 RI, 'cause 1.2 isn't available yet
- I'll file a JIRA issue for this.
I wish it could be based on MyFaces, but 1.2 isn't there yet,
and I wish I had time to help out on MyFaces 1.2, but I don't... :(
My assumption is that this won't be the final 1.2 branch - instead
of regular merges from trunk onto this branch, it'll probably
be easier to create new 1.2 branches and merge the 1.2
work onto that. Or, to be more brief, I'm assuming that we
won't bother having anyone check patches into both
branches, at least for now - we'll just do 1.2 work on the 1.2
branch, and occasionally create new 1.2 branches to
pull in all the latest patches.
How's this sound?
-- Adam
Re: JSF 1.2 branch of Trinidad
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
BTW, just to state it publicly, once there's a MyFaces 1.2 version
out there, I'd vote to switch to it for compilation and building ASAP,
though of course we'd support the Sun and Apache implementations.
-- Adam
On 9/28/06, Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hopefully that horrible semester will end one day and I can help with
> MyFaces. Anyway, I'm all for a JSF 1.2 Trinidad version, after all it's
> the
> standard for JEE 5.
>
> ~ Simon
>
> On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > good.
> > dennis is now rails and I am bussy
> > so there is currently nobody :)
> >
> > On 9/28/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yeah, as soon as Tomahawk 1.1.5 is done, there'll be quite some 1.2
> > > work going on. I promise.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > I am fine with that, also w/ using RI 1.2 instead of MyFaces.
> > > >
> > > > On the 1.2 is not much work going on. I hope that changes soon ;)
> > > >
> > > > -M
> > > >
> > > > On 9/28/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > (Re-sending; it bounced the first time)
> > > > >
> > > > > My bosses at work are starting to request a JSF 1.2-based version
> > > > > of Trinidad, so I'd like to get started on that. What I'm
> thinking
> > of:
> > > > >
> > > > > - A branch off the trunk (not on trunk)
> > > > > - Depending on the 1.2 RI, 'cause 1.2 isn't available yet
> > > > > - I'll file a JIRA issue for this.
> > > > >
> > > > > I wish it could be based on MyFaces, but 1.2 isn't there yet,
> > > > > and I wish I had time to help out on MyFaces 1.2, but I don't...
> :(
> > > > >
> > > > > My assumption is that this won't be the final 1.2 branch - instead
> > > > > of regular merges from trunk onto this branch, it'll probably
> > > > > be easier to create new 1.2 branches and merge the 1.2
> > > > > work onto that. Or, to be more brief, I'm assuming that we
> > > > > won't bother having anyone check patches into both
> > > > > branches, at least for now - we'll just do 1.2 work on the 1.2
> > > > > branch, and occasionally create new 1.2 branches to
> > > > > pull in all the latest patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > How's this sound?
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Adam
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
Re: JSF 1.2 branch of Trinidad
Posted by Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com>.
Hopefully that horrible semester will end one day and I can help with
MyFaces. Anyway, I'm all for a JSF 1.2 Trinidad version, after all it's the
standard for JEE 5.
~ Simon
On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> good.
> dennis is now rails and I am bussy
> so there is currently nobody :)
>
> On 9/28/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, as soon as Tomahawk 1.1.5 is done, there'll be quite some 1.2
> > work going on. I promise.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I am fine with that, also w/ using RI 1.2 instead of MyFaces.
> > >
> > > On the 1.2 is not much work going on. I hope that changes soon ;)
> > >
> > > -M
> > >
> > > On 9/28/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > (Re-sending; it bounced the first time)
> > > >
> > > > My bosses at work are starting to request a JSF 1.2-based version
> > > > of Trinidad, so I'd like to get started on that. What I'm thinking
> of:
> > > >
> > > > - A branch off the trunk (not on trunk)
> > > > - Depending on the 1.2 RI, 'cause 1.2 isn't available yet
> > > > - I'll file a JIRA issue for this.
> > > >
> > > > I wish it could be based on MyFaces, but 1.2 isn't there yet,
> > > > and I wish I had time to help out on MyFaces 1.2, but I don't... :(
> > > >
> > > > My assumption is that this won't be the final 1.2 branch - instead
> > > > of regular merges from trunk onto this branch, it'll probably
> > > > be easier to create new 1.2 branches and merge the 1.2
> > > > work onto that. Or, to be more brief, I'm assuming that we
> > > > won't bother having anyone check patches into both
> > > > branches, at least for now - we'll just do 1.2 work on the 1.2
> > > > branch, and occasionally create new 1.2 branches to
> > > > pull in all the latest patches.
> > > >
> > > > How's this sound?
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
Re: JSF 1.2 branch of Trinidad
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
good.
dennis is now rails and I am bussy
so there is currently nobody :)
On 9/28/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, as soon as Tomahawk 1.1.5 is done, there'll be quite some 1.2
> work going on. I promise.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I am fine with that, also w/ using RI 1.2 instead of MyFaces.
> >
> > On the 1.2 is not much work going on. I hope that changes soon ;)
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On 9/28/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > (Re-sending; it bounced the first time)
> > >
> > > My bosses at work are starting to request a JSF 1.2-based version
> > > of Trinidad, so I'd like to get started on that. What I'm thinking of:
> > >
> > > - A branch off the trunk (not on trunk)
> > > - Depending on the 1.2 RI, 'cause 1.2 isn't available yet
> > > - I'll file a JIRA issue for this.
> > >
> > > I wish it could be based on MyFaces, but 1.2 isn't there yet,
> > > and I wish I had time to help out on MyFaces 1.2, but I don't... :(
> > >
> > > My assumption is that this won't be the final 1.2 branch - instead
> > > of regular merges from trunk onto this branch, it'll probably
> > > be easier to create new 1.2 branches and merge the 1.2
> > > work onto that. Or, to be more brief, I'm assuming that we
> > > won't bother having anyone check patches into both
> > > branches, at least for now - we'll just do 1.2 work on the 1.2
> > > branch, and occasionally create new 1.2 branches to
> > > pull in all the latest patches.
> > >
> > > How's this sound?
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: JSF 1.2 branch of Trinidad
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, as soon as Tomahawk 1.1.5 is done, there'll be quite some 1.2
work going on. I promise.
regards,
Martin
On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> I am fine with that, also w/ using RI 1.2 instead of MyFaces.
>
> On the 1.2 is not much work going on. I hope that changes soon ;)
>
> -M
>
> On 9/28/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > (Re-sending; it bounced the first time)
> >
> > My bosses at work are starting to request a JSF 1.2-based version
> > of Trinidad, so I'd like to get started on that. What I'm thinking of:
> >
> > - A branch off the trunk (not on trunk)
> > - Depending on the 1.2 RI, 'cause 1.2 isn't available yet
> > - I'll file a JIRA issue for this.
> >
> > I wish it could be based on MyFaces, but 1.2 isn't there yet,
> > and I wish I had time to help out on MyFaces 1.2, but I don't... :(
> >
> > My assumption is that this won't be the final 1.2 branch - instead
> > of regular merges from trunk onto this branch, it'll probably
> > be easier to create new 1.2 branches and merge the 1.2
> > work onto that. Or, to be more brief, I'm assuming that we
> > won't bother having anyone check patches into both
> > branches, at least for now - we'll just do 1.2 work on the 1.2
> > branch, and occasionally create new 1.2 branches to
> > pull in all the latest patches.
> >
> > How's this sound?
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: JSF 1.2 branch of Trinidad
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
I am fine with that, also w/ using RI 1.2 instead of MyFaces.
On the 1.2 is not much work going on. I hope that changes soon ;)
-M
On 9/28/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (Re-sending; it bounced the first time)
>
> My bosses at work are starting to request a JSF 1.2-based version
> of Trinidad, so I'd like to get started on that. What I'm thinking of:
>
> - A branch off the trunk (not on trunk)
> - Depending on the 1.2 RI, 'cause 1.2 isn't available yet
> - I'll file a JIRA issue for this.
>
> I wish it could be based on MyFaces, but 1.2 isn't there yet,
> and I wish I had time to help out on MyFaces 1.2, but I don't... :(
>
> My assumption is that this won't be the final 1.2 branch - instead
> of regular merges from trunk onto this branch, it'll probably
> be easier to create new 1.2 branches and merge the 1.2
> work onto that. Or, to be more brief, I'm assuming that we
> won't bother having anyone check patches into both
> branches, at least for now - we'll just do 1.2 work on the 1.2
> branch, and occasionally create new 1.2 branches to
> pull in all the latest patches.
>
> How's this sound?
>
> -- Adam
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com