You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@systemml.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2016/10/25 02:09:26 UTC
Couple of questions on website contents
I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master branch :
Initial page:
- What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but it
looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, and I
have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies the
mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner on
the initial page.
Navigation Menu:
- The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few duplications.
We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also have
the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers that
include the old page listing all committers.
Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I think we
might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the live
website.
Thoughts ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Posted by Felix Schüler <fs...@posteo.de>.
I love the new look & feel of the website and tutorials! (even though there is no Scala in the animation anymore :( )
I explored the website a little bit further and noticed that the docs haven't benefittet from the awesome redesign (yet). Is this planned to change?
Also, I want to bring up versioning of the docs again. When hovering over the docs button, a submenu with release versions for the docs could be available. This would also avoid having to annotate our MLContext API with 'NEW API' and 'OLD API'.
The version of the docs that is packaged in our release could just be used for the respective version of the docs on the website and updated from master if corrections happen between releases.
And finally, think it would be good to have a way of getting back to the main website from the docs with a home button or something.
Besides that, thanks for the great work!
Felix
On 25.10.2016 21:53, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone ahead
> and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
> frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Luciano,
> >
> > Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
> > point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
> >
> > Deron
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Luciano,
> >>
> >> Initial page:
> >>> - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
> >>> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
> >> but it
> >>> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
> >> and I
> >>> have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
> >> the
> >>> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner
> >> on
> >>> the initial page.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the
> >> initial
> >> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
> >> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
> >> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
> >>
> >> Navigation Menu:
> >>> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> >> duplications.
> >>> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
> >> have
> >>> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
> >>> the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
> >> that
> >>> include the old page listing all committers.
> >>
> >>
> >> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his
> >> updates
> >> once they are finished.
> >>
> >> Hope this clears things up!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
> >> branch
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> Initial page:
> >>>
> >>> - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
> >>> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
> >> but it
> >>> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
> >> and I
> >>> have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
> >> the
> >>> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner
> >> on
> >>> the initial page.
> >>>
> >>> Navigation Menu:
> >>> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> >> duplications.
> >>> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
> >> have
> >>> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
> >>> the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
> >> that
> >>> include the old page listing all committers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I think
> >> we
> >>> might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the
> >> live
> >>> website.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts ?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Luciano Resende
> >>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Posted by Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the feedback Mike. We are working on making the website
responsive.
On Oct 26, 2016 8:19 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Overall, the new website looks awesome! Good job everyone!
>
> One concerning issue though is that the site is currently fairly broken on
> mobile. Can we update the site so that it renders properly on both desktop
> and mobile?
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 26, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Dexter Lesaca <de...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The site looks really good everyone! Thank to everyone for churning out
> > this awesome! Thanks for your diligence during design and development
> > process!
> >
> > Luciano, your fix is just fine for now until a more encompassing solution
> > is designed which we should arrive at soon.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:20 AM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I made that change, as I think we need to ve able to list all available
> > mailing lists, but I didn't want to use the obsolete docs page.
> >
> > Thinking more about this, maybe a meet in the middle approach is to use
> the
> > full details on the community page, and revert the front page to focus on
> > the dev list ?
> >
> > Tgoughts ?
> >
> >> On Wednesday, October 26, 2016, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Deron,
> >>
> >> Thanks for publishing the updates, and the site looks great! One thing I
> >> noticed is that the "Subscribe to Our Mailing Lists" section does not
> >> reflect what the design team originally had. I'm not sure if you were
> > aware
> >> of this discrepancy.
> >>
> >> [image: Inline image 1]
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Deron Eriksson <
> deroneriksson@gmail.com
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Luciano,
> >>>
> >>> Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone
> >>> ahead
> >>> and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
> >>> frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
> >>>
> >>> Deron
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <
> deroneriksson@gmail.com
> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Luciano,
> >>>>
> >>>> Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
> >>>> point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
> >>>>
> >>>> Deron
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <
> jason.azares@gmail.com
> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jason.azares@gmail.com');>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Luciano,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Initial page:
> >>>>>> - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
> >>> ? I
> >>>>>> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
> >>>>> but it
> >>>>>> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
> >>>>> and I
> >>>>>> have changed the one in community to what I think it better
> > clarifies
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
> >>> banner
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>> the initial page.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the
> >>>>> initial
> >>>>> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call
> to
> >>>>> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are
> currently
> >>>>> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Navigation Menu:
> >>>>>> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> >>>>> duplications.
> >>>>>> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
> >>> also
> >>>>> have
> >>>>>> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
> >>> using
> >>>>>> the new design format, but there is also a link to project
> > committers
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>> include the old page listing all committers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his
> >>>>> updates
> >>>>> once they are finished.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hope this clears things up!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Jason
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com
> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
> >>>>> branch
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Initial page:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
> >>> ? I
> >>>>>> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
> >>>>> but it
> >>>>>> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
> >>>>> and I
> >>>>>> have changed the one in community to what I think it better
> > clarifies
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
> >>> banner
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>> the initial page.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Navigation Menu:
> >>>>>> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> >>>>> duplications.
> >>>>>> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
> >>> also
> >>>>> have
> >>>>>> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
> >>> using
> >>>>>> the new design format, but there is also a link to project
> > committers
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>> include the old page listing all committers.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I
> >>> think
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>> might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to
> >>> the
> >>>>> live
> >>>>>> website.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thoughts ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Luciano Resende
> >>>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >>>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my Mobile device
>
Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Posted by du...@gmail.com.
Overall, the new website looks awesome! Good job everyone!
One concerning issue though is that the site is currently fairly broken on mobile. Can we update the site so that it renders properly on both desktop and mobile?
-Mike
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Dexter Lesaca <de...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The site looks really good everyone! Thank to everyone for churning out
> this awesome! Thanks for your diligence during design and development
> process!
>
> Luciano, your fix is just fine for now until a more encompassing solution
> is designed which we should arrive at soon.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:20 AM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I made that change, as I think we need to ve able to list all available
> mailing lists, but I didn't want to use the obsolete docs page.
>
> Thinking more about this, maybe a meet in the middle approach is to use the
> full details on the community page, and revert the front page to focus on
> the dev list ?
>
> Tgoughts ?
>
>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2016, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Deron,
>>
>> Thanks for publishing the updates, and the site looks great! One thing I
>> noticed is that the "Subscribe to Our Mailing Lists" section does not
>> reflect what the design team originally had. I'm not sure if you were
> aware
>> of this discrepancy.
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Luciano,
>>>
>>> Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone
>>> ahead
>>> and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
>>> frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
>>>
>>> Deron
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Luciano,
>>>>
>>>> Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
>>>> point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
>>>>
>>>> Deron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <jason.azares@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jason.azares@gmail.com');>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Luciano,
>>>>>
>>>>> Initial page:
>>>>>> - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
>>> ? I
>>>>>> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>>>>> but it
>>>>>> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>>>>> and I
>>>>>> have changed the one in community to what I think it better
> clarifies
>>>>> the
>>>>>> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
>>> banner
>>>>> on
>>>>>> the initial page.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the
>>>>> initial
>>>>> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
>>>>> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
>>>>> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Navigation Menu:
>>>>>> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>>>>> duplications.
>>>>>> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
>>> also
>>>>> have
>>>>>> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
>>> using
>>>>>> the new design format, but there is also a link to project
> committers
>>>>> that
>>>>>> include the old page listing all committers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his
>>>>> updates
>>>>> once they are finished.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope this clears things up!
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
>>>>> branch
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Initial page:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
>>> ? I
>>>>>> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>>>>> but it
>>>>>> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>>>>> and I
>>>>>> have changed the one in community to what I think it better
> clarifies
>>>>> the
>>>>>> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
>>> banner
>>>>> on
>>>>>> the initial page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Navigation Menu:
>>>>>> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>>>>> duplications.
>>>>>> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
>>> also
>>>>> have
>>>>>> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
>>> using
>>>>>> the new design format, but there is also a link to project
> committers
>>>>> that
>>>>>> include the old page listing all committers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I
>>> think
>>>>> we
>>>>>> might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to
>>> the
>>>>> live
>>>>>> website.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Luciano Resende
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>>>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my Mobile device
Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Posted by Dexter Lesaca <de...@gmail.com>.
The site looks really good everyone! Thank to everyone for churning out
this awesome! Thanks for your diligence during design and development
process!
Luciano, your fix is just fine for now until a more encompassing solution
is designed which we should arrive at soon.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:20 AM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I made that change, as I think we need to ve able to list all available
mailing lists, but I didn't want to use the obsolete docs page.
Thinking more about this, maybe a meet in the middle approach is to use the
full details on the community page, and revert the front page to focus on
the dev list ?
Tgoughts ?
On Wednesday, October 26, 2016, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Deron,
>
> Thanks for publishing the updates, and the site looks great! One thing I
> noticed is that the "Subscribe to Our Mailing Lists" section does not
> reflect what the design team originally had. I'm not sure if you were
aware
> of this discrepancy.
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Luciano,
>>
>> Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone
>> ahead
>> and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
>> frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Luciano,
>> >
>> > Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
>> > point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
>> >
>> > Deron
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <jason.azares@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jason.azares@gmail.com');>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Luciano,
>> >>
>> >> Initial page:
>> >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
>> ? I
>> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>> >> but it
>> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>> >> and I
>> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better
clarifies
>> >> the
>> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
>> banner
>> >> on
>> >> > the initial page.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the
>> >> initial
>> >> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
>> >> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
>> >> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
>> >>
>> >> Navigation Menu:
>> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>> >> duplications.
>> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
>> also
>> >> have
>> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
>> using
>> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project
committers
>> >> that
>> >> > include the old page listing all committers.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his
>> >> updates
>> >> once they are finished.
>> >>
>> >> Hope this clears things up!
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Jason
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
>> >> branch
>> >> > :
>> >> >
>> >> > Initial page:
>> >> >
>> >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
>> ? I
>> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>> >> but it
>> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>> >> and I
>> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better
clarifies
>> >> the
>> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
>> banner
>> >> on
>> >> > the initial page.
>> >> >
>> >> > Navigation Menu:
>> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>> >> duplications.
>> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
>> also
>> >> have
>> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
>> using
>> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project
committers
>> >> that
>> >> > include the old page listing all committers.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I
>> think
>> >> we
>> >> > might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to
>> the
>> >> live
>> >> > website.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thoughts ?
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Luciano Resende
>> >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
--
Sent from my Mobile device
Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
I made that change, as I think we need to ve able to list all available
mailing lists, but I didn't want to use the obsolete docs page.
Thinking more about this, maybe a meet in the middle approach is to use the
full details on the community page, and revert the front page to focus on
the dev list ?
Tgoughts ?
On Wednesday, October 26, 2016, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Deron,
>
> Thanks for publishing the updates, and the site looks great! One thing I
> noticed is that the "Subscribe to Our Mailing Lists" section does not
> reflect what the design team originally had. I'm not sure if you were aware
> of this discrepancy.
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Luciano,
>>
>> Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone
>> ahead
>> and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
>> frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Luciano,
>> >
>> > Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
>> > point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
>> >
>> > Deron
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <jason.azares@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jason.azares@gmail.com');>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Luciano,
>> >>
>> >> Initial page:
>> >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
>> ? I
>> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>> >> but it
>> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>> >> and I
>> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
>> >> the
>> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
>> banner
>> >> on
>> >> > the initial page.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the
>> >> initial
>> >> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
>> >> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
>> >> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
>> >>
>> >> Navigation Menu:
>> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>> >> duplications.
>> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
>> also
>> >> have
>> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
>> using
>> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
>> >> that
>> >> > include the old page listing all committers.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his
>> >> updates
>> >> once they are finished.
>> >>
>> >> Hope this clears things up!
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Jason
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
>> >> branch
>> >> > :
>> >> >
>> >> > Initial page:
>> >> >
>> >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
>> ? I
>> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>> >> but it
>> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>> >> and I
>> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
>> >> the
>> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
>> banner
>> >> on
>> >> > the initial page.
>> >> >
>> >> > Navigation Menu:
>> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>> >> duplications.
>> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
>> also
>> >> have
>> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
>> using
>> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
>> >> that
>> >> > include the old page listing all committers.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I
>> think
>> >> we
>> >> > might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to
>> the
>> >> live
>> >> > website.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thoughts ?
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Luciano Resende
>> >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
--
Sent from my Mobile device
Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Posted by Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hi Deron,
Thanks for publishing the updates, and the site looks great! One thing I
noticed is that the "Subscribe to Our Mailing Lists" section does not
reflect what the design team originally had. I'm not sure if you were aware
of this discrepancy.
[image: Inline image 1]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone ahead
> and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
> frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Luciano,
> >
> > Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
> > point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
> >
> > Deron
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Luciano,
> >>
> >> Initial page:
> >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ?
> I
> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
> >> but it
> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
> >> and I
> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
> >> the
> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
> banner
> >> on
> >> > the initial page.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the
> >> initial
> >> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
> >> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
> >> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
> >>
> >> Navigation Menu:
> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> >> duplications.
> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
> >> have
> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
> using
> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
> >> that
> >> > include the old page listing all committers.
> >>
> >>
> >> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his
> >> updates
> >> once they are finished.
> >>
> >> Hope this clears things up!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
> >> branch
> >> > :
> >> >
> >> > Initial page:
> >> >
> >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ?
> I
> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
> >> but it
> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
> >> and I
> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
> >> the
> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
> banner
> >> on
> >> > the initial page.
> >> >
> >> > Navigation Menu:
> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> >> duplications.
> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
> >> have
> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
> using
> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
> >> that
> >> > include the old page listing all committers.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I
> think
> >> we
> >> > might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the
> >> live
> >> > website.
> >> >
> >> > Thoughts ?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Luciano Resende
> >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Hi Luciano,
Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone ahead
and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
Deron
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
> point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Luciano,
>>
>> Initial page:
>> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
>> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>> but it
>> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>> and I
>> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
>> the
>> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner
>> on
>> > the initial page.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the
>> initial
>> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
>> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
>> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
>>
>> Navigation Menu:
>> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>> duplications.
>> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
>> have
>> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
>> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
>> that
>> > include the old page listing all committers.
>>
>>
>> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his
>> updates
>> once they are finished.
>>
>> Hope this clears things up!
>>
>> Best,
>> Jason
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
>> branch
>> > :
>> >
>> > Initial page:
>> >
>> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
>> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>> but it
>> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>> and I
>> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
>> the
>> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner
>> on
>> > the initial page.
>> >
>> > Navigation Menu:
>> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>> duplications.
>> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
>> have
>> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
>> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
>> that
>> > include the old page listing all committers.
>> >
>> >
>> > Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I think
>> we
>> > might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the
>> live
>> > website.
>> >
>> > Thoughts ?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Luciano Resende
>> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Hi Luciano,
Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
Deron
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> Initial page:
> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but
> it
> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, and
> I
> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies the
> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner
> on
> > the initial page.
>
>
> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the initial
> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
>
> Navigation Menu:
> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> duplications.
> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
> have
> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
> that
> > include the old page listing all committers.
>
>
> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his updates
> once they are finished.
>
> Hope this clears things up!
>
> Best,
> Jason
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
> branch
> > :
> >
> > Initial page:
> >
> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but
> it
> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, and
> I
> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies the
> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner
> on
> > the initial page.
> >
> > Navigation Menu:
> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> duplications.
> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
> have
> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
> that
> > include the old page listing all committers.
> >
> >
> > Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I think
> we
> > might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the
> live
> > website.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Posted by Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hi Luciano,
Initial page:
> - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but it
> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, and I
> have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies the
> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner on
> the initial page.
Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the initial
page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
Navigation Menu:
> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few duplications.
> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also have
> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
> the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers that
> include the old page listing all committers.
Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his updates
once they are finished.
Hope this clears things up!
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master branch
> :
>
> Initial page:
>
> - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but it
> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, and I
> have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies the
> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner on
> the initial page.
>
> Navigation Menu:
> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few duplications.
> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also have
> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
> the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers that
> include the old page listing all committers.
>
>
> Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I think we
> might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the live
> website.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>