You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Edward Capriolo (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/13 00:21:47 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (CASSANDRA-1657) support in-memory column families

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Edward Capriolo reassigned CASSANDRA-1657:
------------------------------------------

    Assignee: Edward Capriolo

> support in-memory column families
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1657
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1657
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Peter Schuller
>            Assignee: Edward Capriolo
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Some workloads are such that you absolutely depend on column families being in-memory for performance, yet you most definitely want all the things that Cassandra offers in terms of replication, consistency, durability etc.
> In order to semi-deterministically ensure acceptable performance for such data, Cassandra could support in-memory column families. Such an in-memory column family would imply that mlock() be used on sstables for this column family. On start-up and on compaction completion, they could be mmap():ed with MAP_POPULATE (Linux specific) or else just mmap():ed + mlock():ed in such a way as to otherwise guarantee it is in-memory (such as userland traversal of the entire file).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)