You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Lukas Theussl (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2010/12/19 12:58:58 UTC

[jira] Closed: (MSITE-422) Links being "relativized" incorrectly.

     [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Lukas Theussl closed MSITE-422.
-------------------------------

    Resolution: Incomplete
      Assignee: Lukas Theussl

> Links being "relativized" incorrectly.
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MSITE-422
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-422
>             Project: Maven 2.x and 3.x Site Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: relative links
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>            Reporter: Jason Smith
>            Assignee: Lukas Theussl
>
> This also appears to be broken in 2.1-SNAPSHOT as the original entry date of this JIRA.  It was first discovered in 2.0, and also affects 2.0.1.
> I have the following links in my site.xml.  This is a multi-module project, but this affects the top-level (parent) project documentation.
>     <links>
>       <item name="Groovy" href="http://groovy.codehaus.org/COM+Scripting/.." />
>       <item name="Scriptom Wiki" href="http://groovy.codehaus.org/COM+Scripting" />
>     </links>
> Here is the HTML produced:
>     <a href="../">Groovy</a>  |
>     <a href="http://groovy.codehaus.org/COM+Scripting" class="externalLink">Scriptom Wiki</a>
> The first link is relativized.  Incorrectly.  My site-distribution is:
> <site>
> <id>codehaus.org.snapshots</id>
> <name>Groovy Website</name>
> <url>dav:https://dav.codehaus.org/groovy/modules/scriptom/SNAPSHOT/${project.version}</url>
> </site>
> Technically, the relative path should be "../../../../..".  It would have worked just fine if the HREF were "http://groovy.codehaus.org/".  
> Is it actually necessary to complicate the <links/> by relativizing the paths whenever possible, or would it be simpler just to pass the original HREF through unmodified?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira