You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@taverna.apache.org by Stian Soiland-Reyes <so...@cs.manchester.ac.uk> on 2016/06/17 09:40:19 UTC

Fwd: CWL+researchobject.org; MRC to give talk at CHARME event, Wed June 22, Warsaw, Poland

FYI: Michael Crusoe (CWL) will be presenting Common Workflow Language and
ResearchObject at a COST meeting this Monday, both are in a way Taverna
derived.

Looking forward to see the slides!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Michael Crusoe" <mi...@gmail.com>
Date: 16 Jun 2016 11:34 a.m.
Subject: CWL+researchobject.org; MRC to give talk at CHARME event, Wed June
22, Warsaw, Poland
To: "common-workflow-language@googlegroups.com" <
common-workflow-language@googlegroups.com>
Cc:

http://www.cost-charme.eu/events/the-charme-of-standardisation-in-life-sciences-21-22-june-2016-in-warsaw-poland
>
> As some of you may know, the researchobject.org (RO) and the CWL
> communities have been talking at length about how to work together. The fit
> is obvious: CWL needs a well thought out model for provenance reporting and
> attribution; RO needs a portable+executable serialization of workflows
> (they already have an excellent abstract representation that we heavily
> built off of).
>
> I will post the slides later and content from this talk will make its way
> into other presentations and blog posts.
>
> Title: "So you have a standard, what next? Overview of researchobject.org and
> the Common Workflow Language project."
>
> Author: Michael R. Crusoe
>
> Affiliations: Common Workflow Language project co-founder & Community
> Engineer; ELIXIR-UK participant
>
> Abstract:
>
> This talk will briefly review the work of the researchobject.org
> <http://www.researchobject.org/> and the Common Workflow Language
> <http://www.commonwl.org/> communities to enable the communication of
> digital research artifacts in a reproducible, portable, and executable
> manner while preserving fine-grained attribution and provenance.
>
> These two communities now both face a similar problem: they have created
> useful (and used!) standards; now what? I will explore the challenges of
> relevance and sustainability in the context of scientific ICT standards and
> offer a few proposals.
>
> --
> Michael R. Crusoe
> Community Engineer & Co-founder
> Common Workflow Language project
> https://impactstory.org/u/0000-0002-2961-9670
> michael.crusoe@gmail.com
> +32 (0) 2 808 25 58
> +1 480 627 9108
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "common-workflow-language" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to common-workflow-language+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to
> common-workflow-language@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/common-workflow-language/CAD%3DWrcK%3DNcGdXYLErET%2Be4dcNkz3QZ8438ym9%3DCZU3hz5ewSwA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/common-workflow-language/CAD%3DWrcK%3DNcGdXYLErET%2Be4dcNkz3QZ8438ym9%3DCZU3hz5ewSwA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>