You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wink.apache.org by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com> on 2009/08/05 10:01:39 UTC
[VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Folks,
I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
The Maven staging area is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
The distributions are in:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
This release is tagged at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
Please consider this call to vote as my +1
Regards,
Martin.
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Aug 5, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Please post this email to general@incubator as a heads up and so we
> can get additional feedback on the artifacts. Typically there are a
> lot more people who scrutinize the artifacts in detail over on that
> mailing list.
Not a big deal, but usually, podling votes on the release, first. Then
the Incubator PMC votes on the release (i.e. the podling and ipmc
votes aren't concurrent). Personally, I think this is better -- the
podling takes more responsibility for vetting the release, rather than
being overly reliant on the ipmc...
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Martin,
Please post this email to general@incubator as a heads up and so we can get additional feedback on the artifacts.
Typically there are a lot more people who scrutinize the artifacts in detail over on that mailing list.
thanks,
dims
On 08/05/2009 01:52 PM, Baram, Eliezer wrote:
> +1
>
> Martin, thank you for a great job on the release process.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Snitkovsky, Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:02 AM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
> Regards,
> Martin.
RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by "Baram, Eliezer" <eb...@hp.com>.
+1
Martin, thank you for a great job on the release process.
-----Original Message-----
From: Snitkovsky, Martin
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:02 AM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Folks,
I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
The Maven staging area is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
The distributions are in:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
This release is tagged at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
Please consider this call to vote as my +1
Regards,
Martin.
RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
Kevan,
Thank a lot for your insight. Will apply your recommendations in an upcoming RC.
Regards
--martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevan Miller [mailto:kevan.miller@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 7:55 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
Martin,
It's a good idea to explicitly record when a vote has been stopped or
cancelled. This can be a big help when your search back through an
email list...
Projects can decide how, exactly, they might want to do this. One
common method is to post a reply to this email thread with a new
subject. Something like:
*************************************************
Subject: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Due to the problems found in this release (e.g. LICENSE and NOTICE
file issues), the vote is cancelled. Will be fixing these issues and
generate a new release candidate. In the meantime, please let me know
if any further problems are uncovered with this release.
*************************************************
Since you called the vote, this would typically be expected to be your
responsibility.
Also, I'd recommend you uniquely name vote threads. Something like:
[VOTE] Release Wink 0.1 (RC1)
The naming (e.g. RC1) is simply a name that you're applying to the
vote thread. Not something that needs to be reflected in the artifact
names or svn tags.
Note that this is in no way intended to be a *criticism*. Just passing
along institutional knowledge...
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
Martin,
It's a good idea to explicitly record when a vote has been stopped or
cancelled. This can be a big help when your search back through an
email list...
Projects can decide how, exactly, they might want to do this. One
common method is to post a reply to this email thread with a new
subject. Something like:
*************************************************
Subject: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Due to the problems found in this release (e.g. LICENSE and NOTICE
file issues), the vote is cancelled. Will be fixing these issues and
generate a new release candidate. In the meantime, please let me know
if any further problems are uncovered with this release.
*************************************************
Since you called the vote, this would typically be expected to be your
responsibility.
Also, I'd recommend you uniquely name vote threads. Something like:
[VOTE] Release Wink 0.1 (RC1)
The naming (e.g. RC1) is simply a name that you're applying to the
vote thread. Not something that needs to be reflected in the artifact
names or svn tags.
Note that this is in no way intended to be a *criticism*. Just passing
along institutional knowledge...
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
This is a very common problem with maven projects on windows. IMO the
solution is not to change the artifact names, but to instruct users to
work under c:\<somedir> instead of whatever default windows wants to
choose. The space in the path may also mess up some builds and its
highly advised *not* to build from there.
--jason
On Aug 9, 2009, at 8:37 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> The problem with the names being long is that Windows users may
> encounter issues when unzipping the source zips. I think the path
> limit is around 255 characters. There's around 50 characters in the
> c:\documents and settings\administrator\desktop\ already.
>
> I've updated the pom.xml name elements so that during the Maven build
> it looks better. I think the artifactIds were properly updated but
> please let me know if you see differently.
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jason Dillon<ja...@planet57.com>
> wrote:
>> Why did the name need shortening? We should try to keep atrifactId's
>> consistent with the directory name they are defined in. Its a best
>> practice.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-
>>>> optional-providers/pom.xml,
>>>
>>> Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten
>>> the name.
>>>
>>>> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>>>
>>> Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good.
>>>
>>> There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned.
>>>
>>> -N
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>>> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>>>>
>>>> The Maven staging area is at:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-
>>>> staging-014/
>>>>
>>>> The distributions are in:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>>>>
>>>> This release is tagged at:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>>>
>>>
>>> As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include
>>> the
>>> LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the
>>> DISCLAIMER and
>>> README/RELEASE-NOTES.
>>>
>>> The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src
>>> distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and
>>> notice
>>> files in top-level, directory, though...
>>>
>>> The file,
>>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-
>>> optional-providers/pom.xml,
>>> does not have an Apache source license header. It should.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
>>>
>>> I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK
>>> compliant
>>> implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume that we
>>> have run
>>> the release binaries through the TCK?
>>>
>>> The binary distribution contains two source jars:
>>>
>>> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
>>> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
>>>
>>> You cannot distribute these sources.
>>>
>>> Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been
>>> properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL
>>> license
>>> for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there are
>>> others...
>>>
>>> Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Bryant Luk
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
The problem with the names being long is that Windows users may
encounter issues when unzipping the source zips. I think the path
limit is around 255 characters. There's around 50 characters in the
c:\documents and settings\administrator\desktop\ already.
I've updated the pom.xml name elements so that during the Maven build
it looks better. I think the artifactIds were properly updated but
please let me know if you see differently.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jason Dillon<ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Why did the name need shortening? We should try to keep atrifactId's
> consistent with the directory name they are defined in. Its a best
> practice.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote:
>
>>
>> Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues.
>>
>>>
>>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml,
>>
>> Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten the name.
>>
>>> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>>
>> Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good.
>>
>> There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned.
>>
>> -N
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>>
>>
>> On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>>>
>>> The Maven staging area is at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>>>
>>> The distributions are in:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>>>
>>> This release is tagged at:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>>
>>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>>
>>
>> As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include the
>> LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the DISCLAIMER and
>> README/RELEASE-NOTES.
>>
>> The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src
>> distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and notice
>> files in top-level, directory, though...
>>
>> The file,
>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml,
>> does not have an Apache source license header. It should.
>>
>> Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
>>
>> I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK compliant
>> implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume that we have run
>> the release binaries through the TCK?
>>
>> The binary distribution contains two source jars:
>>
>> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
>> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
>>
>> You cannot distribute these sources.
>>
>> Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been
>> properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL license
>> for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there are others...
>>
>> Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
- Bryant Luk
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Why did the name need shortening? We should try to keep atrifactId's
consistent with the directory name they are defined in. Its a best
practice.
--jason
On Aug 8, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote:
>
> Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues.
>
>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-
>> optional-providers/pom.xml,
>
> Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten the
> name.
>
>> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good.
>
> There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned.
>
> -N
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>>
>> The Maven staging area is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>>
>> The distributions are in:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>
>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
>
> As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include
> the LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the
> DISCLAIMER and README/RELEASE-NOTES.
>
> The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src
> distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and
> notice files in top-level, directory, though...
>
> The file, wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-
> jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, does not have an Apache source
> license header. It should.
>
> Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
>
> I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK
> compliant implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume
> that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> The binary distribution contains two source jars:
>
> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
>
> You cannot distribute these sources.
>
> Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been
> properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL
> license for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there
> are others...
>
> Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
All artifact ids were also renamed ... integration-test became itest ... or I miss something
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:jason.dillon@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 10:53 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Why did the name need shortening? We should try to keep atrifactId's
consistent with the directory name they are defined in. Its a best
practice.
--jason
On Aug 8, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote:
>
> Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues.
>
>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-
>> optional-providers/pom.xml,
>
> Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten the
> name.
>
>> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good.
>
> There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned.
>
> -N
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>>
>> The Maven staging area is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>>
>> The distributions are in:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>
>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
>
> As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include
> the LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the
> DISCLAIMER and README/RELEASE-NOTES.
>
> The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src
> distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and
> notice files in top-level, directory, though...
>
> The file, wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-
> jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, does not have an Apache source
> license header. It should.
>
> Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
>
> I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK
> compliant implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume
> that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> The binary distribution contains two source jars:
>
> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
>
> You cannot distribute these sources.
>
> Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been
> properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL
> license for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there
> are others...
>
> Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Why did the name need shortening? We should try to keep atrifactId's
consistent with the directory name they are defined in. Its a best
practice.
--jason
On Aug 8, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote:
>
> Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues.
>
>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-
>> optional-providers/pom.xml,
>
> Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten the
> name.
>
>> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good.
>
> There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned.
>
> -N
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>>
>> The Maven staging area is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>>
>> The distributions are in:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>
>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
>
> As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include
> the LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the
> DISCLAIMER and README/RELEASE-NOTES.
>
> The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src
> distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and
> notice files in top-level, directory, though...
>
> The file, wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-
> jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, does not have an Apache source
> license header. It should.
>
> Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
>
> I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK
> compliant implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume
> that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> The binary distribution contains two source jars:
>
> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
>
> You cannot distribute these sources.
>
> Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been
> properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL
> license for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there
> are others...
>
> Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
Yes, we will re-spin a 0.1 tag, once all issues are resolved.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:25 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
I had assumed that we'd re-spin the tag as well.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 3:21:20 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml
became
wink-itests/wink-itest/wink-itest-extra-providers/pom.xml
in trunk.
I'm assuming that we'll have to re-spin from trunk to a new 0.1 tag so
I'm making changes there. I always thought that SVN tags shouldn't be
worked on, but if we're not going to re-spin I will be glad to merge
changes over.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nicholas Gallardo<ni...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues.
>
>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml,
>
> Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten the name.
>
>> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good.
>
> There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned.
>
> -N
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>>
>> The Maven staging area is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>>
>> The distributions are in:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>
>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
>
> As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include the LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the DISCLAIMER and README/RELEASE-NOTES.
>
> The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and notice files in top-level, directory, though...
>
> The file, wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, does not have an Apache source license header. It should.
>
> Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
>
> I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK compliant implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> The binary distribution contains two source jars:
>
> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
>
> You cannot distribute these sources.
>
> Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL license for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there are others...
>
> Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
--
- Bryant Luk
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>.
I had assumed that we'd re-spin the tag as well.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 3:21:20 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml
became
wink-itests/wink-itest/wink-itest-extra-providers/pom.xml
in trunk.
I'm assuming that we'll have to re-spin from trunk to a new 0.1 tag so
I'm making changes there. I always thought that SVN tags shouldn't be
worked on, but if we're not going to re-spin I will be glad to merge
changes over.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nicholas Gallardo<ni...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues.
>
>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml,
>
> Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten the name.
>
>> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good.
>
> There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned.
>
> -N
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>>
>> The Maven staging area is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>>
>> The distributions are in:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>
>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
>
> As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include the LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the DISCLAIMER and README/RELEASE-NOTES.
>
> The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and notice files in top-level, directory, though...
>
> The file, wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, does not have an Apache source license header. It should.
>
> Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
>
> I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK compliant implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> The binary distribution contains two source jars:
>
> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
>
> You cannot distribute these sources.
>
> Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL license for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there are others...
>
> Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
--
- Bryant Luk
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml
became
wink-itests/wink-itest/wink-itest-extra-providers/pom.xml
in trunk.
I'm assuming that we'll have to re-spin from trunk to a new 0.1 tag so
I'm making changes there. I always thought that SVN tags shouldn't be
worked on, but if we're not going to re-spin I will be glad to merge
changes over.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nicholas Gallardo<ni...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues.
>
>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml,
>
> Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten the name.
>
>> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good.
>
> There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned.
>
> -N
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>>
>> The Maven staging area is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>>
>> The distributions are in:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>
>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
>
> As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include the LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the DISCLAIMER and README/RELEASE-NOTES.
>
> The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and notice files in top-level, directory, though...
>
> The file, wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, does not have an Apache source license header. It should.
>
> Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
>
> I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK compliant implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
>
> The binary distribution contains two source jars:
>
> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
>
> You cannot distribute these sources.
>
> Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL license for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there are others...
>
> Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
--
- Bryant Luk
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>.
Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues.
> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml,
Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten the name.
> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good.
There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include the LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the DISCLAIMER and README/RELEASE-NOTES.
The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and notice files in top-level, directory, though...
The file, wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, does not have an Apache source license header. It should.
Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK compliant implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
The binary distribution contains two source jars:
lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
You cannot distribute these sources.
Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL license for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there are others...
Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>.
Thanks for the feedback Kevan. I'll open JIRAs for some of things below.
----- Original Message ----
From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include the LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the DISCLAIMER and README/RELEASE-NOTES.
The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and notice files in top-level, directory, though...
The file, wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, does not have an Apache source license header. It should.
Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK compliant implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
The binary distribution contains two source jars:
lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
You cannot distribute these sources.
Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL license for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there are others...
Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Aug 7, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
<snip>
>
> The binary distribution contains two source jars:
>
> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
>
> You cannot distribute these sources.
I should have explained a bit more. These sources are CDDL licensed.
CDDL is classified by the ASF as a "Reciprocal License" that may only
be distributed by an Apache project in binary form, not source. So,
IMO, we should not include these sources.
For more licensing information, see http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include the
LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the DISCLAIMER
and README/RELEASE-NOTES.
The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src
distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and
notice files in top-level, directory, though...
The file, wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-
jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, does not have an Apache source
license header. It should.
Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me.
I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK
compliant implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume
that we have run the release binaries through the TCK?
The binary distribution contains two source jars:
lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar
lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar
You cannot distribute these sources.
Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been
properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL
license for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there are
others...
Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
+1
Catching up on e-mail, but I took a look at the source and the binary
distributions this morning. Looks great. Thanks Martin for doing the
release work.
The only problem I ran into was unzipping the source distribution onto
my desktop ran into a Windows error due to the long path of some of
the directories/names. Really a Windows issue. Unzipping it in
c:\winktemp or something worked out.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Snitkovsky,
Martin<ma...@hp.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
> Regards,
> Martin.
>
--
- Bryant Luk
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>.
Dan, thanks for the insights. That makes sense to me.
I was concerned we were missing a step in the Apache release process and didn't want that to hold up the release when it got to the incubator list. Sounds like we're good to go though.
+1 and I'll shut up now. :)
-Nick
----- Original Message ----
From: Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>; "nickgallardo@yahoo.com" <ni...@yahoo.com>; Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 9:49:37 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
On Wed August 5 2009 7:46:07 am Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> Don't remember seeing other projects using RC available publicly or reading
> abt it in Apache ... but I will check it again.
>
> Dan, Jason - any insight ?
Depends on the project. Some do have actual "rc" tagged builds, some don't.
For CXF, I think out of the 27 releases we've done, we've only done a "rc"
tagged build once, and that was mostly because I was testing out some release-
plugin things. Maven tends to do RC's for maven itself, but not for each
plugin.
Basically, for CXF, we have snapshots deployed by hudson almost every night.
Thus, as we get closer to a release, we encourage potential testers to grab
the snapshots to make sure it works. The devs also grab snapshots to check
legal junk and such. When everyone is more or less happy, we do exactly
what you did and use the release plugin to stage an actual release candidate
that is voted on. If the vote passes, great. If an issue is found, the
vote is canceled and redone with a new rc.
Dan
>
> --martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:41 PM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> Yep, exactly... Have to step away for a bit, but will check the Apache
> docs this morning and see what I can find.
>
> -N
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
> To: "nickgallardo@yahoo.com" <ni...@yahoo.com>;
> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org> Sent:
> Wednesday, August 5, 2009 6:28:32 AM
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
> By RC you mean making Wink publicly available (wink-0.1-incubating-rc) for
> customers review?
>
> -martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:09 PM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> I'm +1 with a question.
>
> My understanding was that we had to release an RC before the final release.
> Is that not true?
>
> -Nick
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 3:12:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> I've also tested this release with TCK and it's compliant.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin <
>
> martin.snitkovsky@hp.com> wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
> >
> > The Maven staging area is at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
> >
> > The distributions are in:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/a
> >pache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
> >
> > This release is tagged at:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
> >
> > The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Please consider this call to vote as my +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin.
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Wed August 5 2009 7:46:07 am Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> Don't remember seeing other projects using RC available publicly or reading
> abt it in Apache ... but I will check it again.
>
> Dan, Jason - any insight ?
Depends on the project. Some do have actual "rc" tagged builds, some don't.
For CXF, I think out of the 27 releases we've done, we've only done a "rc"
tagged build once, and that was mostly because I was testing out some release-
plugin things. Maven tends to do RC's for maven itself, but not for each
plugin.
Basically, for CXF, we have snapshots deployed by hudson almost every night.
Thus, as we get closer to a release, we encourage potential testers to grab
the snapshots to make sure it works. The devs also grab snapshots to check
legal junk and such. When everyone is more or less happy, we do exactly
what you did and use the release plugin to stage an actual release candidate
that is voted on. If the vote passes, great. If an issue is found, the
vote is canceled and redone with a new rc.
Dan
>
> --martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:41 PM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> Yep, exactly... Have to step away for a bit, but will check the Apache
> docs this morning and see what I can find.
>
> -N
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
> To: "nickgallardo@yahoo.com" <ni...@yahoo.com>;
> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org> Sent:
> Wednesday, August 5, 2009 6:28:32 AM
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
> By RC you mean making Wink publicly available (wink-0.1-incubating-rc) for
> customers review?
>
> -martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:09 PM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
>
> I'm +1 with a question.
>
> My understanding was that we had to release an RC before the final release.
> Is that not true?
>
> -Nick
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 3:12:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> I've also tested this release with TCK and it's compliant.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin <
>
> martin.snitkovsky@hp.com> wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
> >
> > The Maven staging area is at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
> >
> > The distributions are in:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/a
> >pache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
> >
> > This release is tagged at:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
> >
> > The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Please consider this call to vote as my +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin.
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
Seems like based on Apache, RC is not publicly available (our RC is what we currently have in Maven staging)
>From "Apache Release Management Guide"
*Release Candidates*
A release candidate is a artifact upon which a vote is held for a release. The actual nature of the release candidate depends on the release system adopted by a the project.
Those projects adopting a system of blessing a candidate will start by creating a candidate which will then be promoted by a series of votes until it either fails or reaches full release status. In this case, the same candidate may be known as a release candidate, an alpha, a beta and then a full release.
Those projects which releases candidates will vote on a sample release candidate.
Only full releases should be place distributed from the main directories. There are a number of reasons for this:
It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to make available release candidates
--martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:41 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Yep, exactly... Have to step away for a bit, but will check the Apache docs this morning and see what I can find.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
To: "nickgallardo@yahoo.com" <ni...@yahoo.com>; "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 6:28:32 AM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
By RC you mean making Wink publicly available (wink-0.1-incubating-rc) for customers review?
-martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:09 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
I'm +1 with a question.
My understanding was that we had to release an RC before the final release. Is that not true?
-Nick
----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 3:12:10 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Here is my +1.
I've also tested this release with TCK and it's compliant.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin <
martin.snitkovsky@hp.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
> Regards,
> Martin.
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
Don't remember seeing other projects using RC available publicly or reading abt it in Apache ... but I will check it again.
Dan, Jason - any insight ?
--martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:41 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Yep, exactly... Have to step away for a bit, but will check the Apache docs this morning and see what I can find.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
To: "nickgallardo@yahoo.com" <ni...@yahoo.com>; "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 6:28:32 AM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
By RC you mean making Wink publicly available (wink-0.1-incubating-rc) for customers review?
-martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:09 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
I'm +1 with a question.
My understanding was that we had to release an RC before the final release. Is that not true?
-Nick
----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 3:12:10 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Here is my +1.
I've also tested this release with TCK and it's compliant.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin <
martin.snitkovsky@hp.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
> Regards,
> Martin.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>.
Yep, exactly... Have to step away for a bit, but will check the Apache docs this morning and see what I can find.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
To: "nickgallardo@yahoo.com" <ni...@yahoo.com>; "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 6:28:32 AM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
By RC you mean making Wink publicly available (wink-0.1-incubating-rc) for customers review?
-martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:09 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
I'm +1 with a question.
My understanding was that we had to release an RC before the final release. Is that not true?
-Nick
----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 3:12:10 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Here is my +1.
I've also tested this release with TCK and it's compliant.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin <
martin.snitkovsky@hp.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
> Regards,
> Martin.
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
By RC you mean making Wink publicly available (wink-0.1-incubating-rc) for customers review?
-martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Gallardo [mailto:nickgallardo@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:09 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
I'm +1 with a question.
My understanding was that we had to release an RC before the final release. Is that not true?
-Nick
----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 3:12:10 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Here is my +1.
I've also tested this release with TCK and it's compliant.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin <
martin.snitkovsky@hp.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
> Regards,
> Martin.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>.
I'm +1 with a question.
My understanding was that we had to release an RC before the final release. Is that not true?
-Nick
----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 3:12:10 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Here is my +1.
I've also tested this release with TCK and it's compliant.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin <
martin.snitkovsky@hp.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
> Regards,
> Martin.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1
Posted by Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>.
Here is my +1.
I've also tested this release with TCK and it's compliant.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin <
martin.snitkovsky@hp.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/
>
> The distributions are in:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1
>
> Regards,
> Martin.
>