You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@uima.apache.org by Ar...@bka.bund.de on 2013/05/17 12:34:10 UTC

Ruta 2.0.2 - Grouping Problems

Hello!

Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} works.
A (B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes a NullPointerException.
(A B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException: -1.

Any ideas?

Cheers,
Armin


AW: Ruta 2.0.2 - Grouping Problems

Posted by Ar...@bka.bund.de.
Hi Peter,

It works. Thank you very much.

Armin 


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Peter Klügl [mailto:pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Mai 2013 17:19
An: user@uima.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Ruta 2.0.2 - Grouping Problems

Hi,

the problem should be fixed now.

Best,

Peter


On 17.05.2013 12:53, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP.
>
> The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw 
> an exception.
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> On 17.05.2013 12:34, Armin.Wegner@bka.bund.de wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} works.
>> A (B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes a NullPointerException.
>> (A B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException: -1.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Armin



Re: Ruta 2.0.2 - Grouping Problems

Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Hi,

the problem should be fixed now.

Best,

Peter


On 17.05.2013 12:53, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP.
>
> The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw an
> exception.
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> On 17.05.2013 12:34, Armin.Wegner@bka.bund.de wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} works.
>> A (B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes a NullPointerException.
>> (A B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException: -1.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Armin


Re: Ruta 2.0.2 - Grouping Problems

Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Hi,

sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP.

The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw an
exception.

Best,

Peter

On 17.05.2013 12:34, Armin.Wegner@bka.bund.de wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} works.
> A (B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes a NullPointerException.
> (A B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException: -1.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
> Armin