Re: [DISCUSS] Draft of Podling Maturity Assessment for APISIX

[Ming Wen <we...@apache.org>]

Hello, Justin and Sheng,
Thanks for your suggestions.
I updated the maturity assessment[1], dockerhub page[2] and committer
page[3].
welcome feedback.

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/APISIX/Podling+Maturity+Assessment+for+APISIX
[2] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/apisix
[3] http://apisix.apache.org/contribute/committer/

Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX & Apache SkyWalking
Twitter: _WenMing


Ming Wen <we...@apache.org> 于2020年3月30日周一 下午5:36写道：

> Hi, justin, thanks for your reply.
>
> > CD30 - You may of misunderstood this question, while having CI is a good
> think , not all users would want to use Jenkins to compile the software.
>
> we use `luarocks` to manage dependencies and compile C libraries, and use
> travis as the continuous integration tool.
>
> > CD40 - Releases should also be archived. Are they currently and if so
> where?
>
> releases are cut from github repository. All releases are tagged and
> archived: https://github.com/apache/incubator-apisix/releases
>
> > RE40 - I think there may be an issue here, it not clear that the docker
> is using the last release or not and there are no release tags for previous
> releases. Either way IMO the description on what the user is getting needs
> to be improved on that page.
>
> Got it, I will update the docker description page.
>
> I will also update website to make it clear about contruibution and ppmc.
>
> Thanks,
> Ming Wen, Apache APISIX & Apache SkyWalking
> Twitter: _WenMing
>
>
> Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 于2020年3月30日周一 上午9:29写道：
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some feedback:
>> CD30 - You may of misunderstood this question, while having CI is a good
>> think , not all users would want to use Jenkins to compile the software.
>> CD40 - Releases should also be archived. Are they currently and if so
>> where?
>> RE40 - I think there may be an issue here, it not clear that the docker
>> is using the last release or not and there are no release tags for previous
>> releases. Either way IMO the description on what the user is getting needs
>> to be improved on that page.
>>
>> I also think that [1] could have some more detail and make it clear that
>> all forms of contruibution are accepted, someone shouldn’t have to
>> contribute code to become a committer. You are also missing a page/section
>> on how someone becomes a (P)PMC member.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>> 1. https://apisix.incubator.apache.org/contribute/committer/
>>
>>