You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@chemistry.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2015/09/01 09:49:43 UTC
svn commit: r963822 - in /websites/staging/chemistry/trunk/content: ./
dotnet/dotcmis-vs-portcmis.html
Author: buildbot
Date: Tue Sep 1 07:49:42 2015
New Revision: 963822
Log:
Staging update by buildbot for chemistry
Modified:
websites/staging/chemistry/trunk/content/ (props changed)
websites/staging/chemistry/trunk/content/dotnet/dotcmis-vs-portcmis.html
Propchange: websites/staging/chemistry/trunk/content/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Tue Sep 1 07:49:42 2015
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1700413
+1700414
Modified: websites/staging/chemistry/trunk/content/dotnet/dotcmis-vs-portcmis.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/staging/chemistry/trunk/content/dotnet/dotcmis-vs-portcmis.html (original)
+++ websites/staging/chemistry/trunk/content/dotnet/dotcmis-vs-portcmis.html Tue Sep 1 07:49:42 2015
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ h2:hover > .headerlink, h3:hover > .head
<p>The APIs of DotCMIS and PortCMIS are very similar. There are just a few minor differences.</p>
<p>These are the main differences:</p>
<table>
-<tr><td></td><td>*DotCMIS*</td><td>*PortCMIS*</td></tr>
+<tr><td></td><td><b>DotCMIS</b></td><td><b>PortCMIS</b></td></tr>
<tr><td>Required .NET Framework</td><td>3.5</td><td>4.5</td></tr>
<tr><td>Windows Store App support</td><td>No</td><td>Yes</td></tr>
<tr><td>Windows Phone support</td><td>No</td><td>Yes</td></tr>