You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> on 2004/11/29 20:16:19 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-67) Network Server on a 64 bit JVM fails with: Execution failed because of a Distributed Protocol Error: DRDA_Proto_SYNTAXRM; CODPNT arg = 2116; Error Code Value = 14

     [ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-67?page=history ]
     
Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-67:
---------------------------------

     Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version: 10.0.2.0

Fixed with SVN 106935

> Network Server on a 64 bit JVM fails with: Execution failed because of a Distributed Protocol Error: DRDA_Proto_SYNTAXRM; CODPNT arg = 2116; Error Code Value = 14
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-67
>          URL: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-67
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: Network Server
>     Versions: 10.0.2.0
>     Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>     Assignee: Kathey Marsden
>      Fix For: 10.0.2.0

>
> The following exception may occur using a 64bit JVM
> Console Output:
> Execution failed because of a Distributed Protocol Error:  
> DRDA_Proto_SYNTAXRM;
> CODPNT arg  = 2116; Error Code Value = 14
> com.ibm.db2j.drda.DRDAProtocolException
>         at 
> com.ibm.db2j.drda.DRDAConnThread.throwSyntaxrm(DRDAConnThread.ja
> va:400)
>         at 
> com.ibm.db2j.drda.DRDAConnThread.invalidValue(DRDAConnThread.jav
> a:6496)
>         at 
> com.ibm.db2j.drda.DRDAConnThread.readBoolean(DRDAConnThread.java
> :6808)
>         at 
> com.ibm.db2j.drda.DRDAConnThread.parsePRPSQLSTT(DRDAConnThread.j
> ava:3061)
>         at 
> com.ibm.db2j.drda.DRDAConnThread.processCommands(DRDAConnThread.
> java:676)
>         at 
> com.ibm.db2j.drda.DRDAConnThread.run(DRDAConnThread.java:233)
> This seems related to the readByte method in DDMReader where the bytep value for Codepoint.FALSE gets altered with a 64 bit JVM.  I think I have a fix for this but need to do some more testing
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira