You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> on 2016/12/19 14:13:04 UTC
Planned release date for 7.6.0
Hello All,
Do you have any estimates for the subject?
Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
Ok let's call it Creative Moments :-D
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 28.12.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
>> On 28/12/2016 14:12, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> doh! Yees you are absolutley right. My fault. It is only required if you check out the github repository.
>>
>> @Andrea sorry that I caused confusion.
>>
>> @Martin thanks for that hint - seems that I really enjoyed the vacation to run into such thoughts. ;-)
>>
> Don't worry. It's nice to see I'm not the only one experiencing these "creative" moments :D
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>>> Am 28.12.16 um 14:07 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>
>>> The eclipse module is not a child of the parent pom, so it is not released
>>> at all with Wicket distro.
>>> It is released by itself only when there are any changes in it.
>>>
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>
>>>> is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this can't be,
>>>> because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So is the
>>>> staged version released with version 4?
>>>>
>>>> kind regards
>>>>
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>> Am 27.12.16 um 14:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
>>>>
>>>> Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository (
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/)
>>>>> does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no
>>>>>> requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was for
>>>>>> 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the release now
>>>>>> this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each time with
>>>>>> wicket.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4 we
>>>>>> also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there will be
>>>>>> issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the
>>>>>> marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that version 4 is not
>>>>>> available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific
>>>>>>> to do for the release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>> ok, I've manually closed it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it
>>>>>>>>>> but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> /content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i
>>>>>>>>>>> will try
>>>>>>>>>>> later this evening .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one
>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1,2,3 -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sven@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
On 28/12/2016 14:12, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> doh! Yees you are absolutley right. My fault. It is only required if
> you check out the github repository.
>
> @Andrea sorry that I caused confusion.
>
> @Martin thanks for that hint - seems that I really enjoyed the
> vacation to run into such thoughts. ;-)
>
Don't worry. It's nice to see I'm not the only one experiencing these
"creative" moments :D
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> Am 28.12.16 um 14:07 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> The eclipse module is not a child of the parent pom, so it is not
>> released
>> at all with Wicket distro.
>> It is released by itself only when there are any changes in it.
>>
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>
>>> is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this
>>> can't be,
>>> because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So
>>> is the
>>> staged version released with version 4?
>>>
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>> Am 27.12.16 um 14:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
>>>
>>> Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository (
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/)
>>>>
>>>> does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>>
>>>>> no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no
>>>>> requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2
>>>>> was for
>>>>> 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the
>>>>> release now
>>>>> this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each
>>>>> time with
>>>>> wicket.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a
>>>>> 4 we
>>>>> also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there
>>>>> will be
>>>>> issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the
>>>>> marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that version 4
>>>>> is not
>>>>> available.
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
>>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something
>>>>>> specific
>>>>>> to do for the release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
>>>>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> ok, I've manually closed it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>>>>>>>> @Martijn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can
>>>>>>>>> create it
>>>>>>>>> but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> /content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i
>>>>>>>>>> will try
>>>>>>>>>> later this evening .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a
>>>>>>>>>>> long one
>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are only
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1,2,3 -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> months
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6.26/7.6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> later
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sven@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Martin,
doh! Yees you are absolutley right. My fault. It is only required if you
check out the github repository.
@Andrea sorry that I caused confusion.
@Martin thanks for that hint - seems that I really enjoyed the vacation
to run into such thoughts. ;-)
kind regards
Tobias
Am 28.12.16 um 14:07 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> The eclipse module is not a child of the parent pom, so it is not released
> at all with Wicket distro.
> It is released by itself only when there are any changes in it.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this can't be,
>> because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So is the
>> staged version released with version 4?
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>> Am 27.12.16 um 14:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
>>
>> Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository (
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/)
>>> does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>
>>>> no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no
>>>> requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was for
>>>> 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the release now
>>>> this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each time with
>>>> wicket.
>>>>
>>>> Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4 we
>>>> also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there will be
>>>> issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the
>>>> marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that version 4 is not
>>>> available.
>>>>
>>>> kind regards
>>>>
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific
>>>>> to do for the release?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> ok, I've manually closed it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>>>>>>> @Martijn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it
>>>>>>>> but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org
>>>>>>>> /content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i
>>>>>>>>> will try
>>>>>>>>> later this evening .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one
>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1,2,3 -
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sven@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi Tobias,
The eclipse module is not a child of the parent pom, so it is not released
at all with Wicket distro.
It is released by itself only when there are any changes in it.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this can't be,
> because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So is the
> staged version released with version 4?
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> Am 27.12.16 um 14:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
>
> Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository (
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/)
>> does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module.
>>
>>
>> On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>
>>> no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no
>>> requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was for
>>> 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the release now
>>> this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each time with
>>> wicket.
>>>
>>> Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4 we
>>> also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there will be
>>> issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the
>>> marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that version 4 is not
>>> available.
>>>
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific
>>>> to do for the release?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>>
>>>>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ok, I've manually closed it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>>>>>> @Martijn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it
>>>>>>> but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org
>>>>>>> /content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i
>>>>>>>> will try
>>>>>>>> later this evening .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one
>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only
>>>>>>>>>>> 1,2,3 -
>>>>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months
>>>>>>>>>>>> from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can
>>>>>>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100%
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sven@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Andrea,
is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this can't
be, because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So
is the staged version released with version 4?
kind regards
Tobias
Am 27.12.16 um 14:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
> Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/)
> does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module.
>
>
> On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no
>> requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was
>> for 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the
>> release now this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be
>> released each time with wicket.
>>
>> Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4
>> we also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there
>> will be issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module
>> from the marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that
>> version 4 is not available.
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>>> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something
>>> specific to do for the release?
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>
>>>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
>>>>
>>>> kind regards
>>>>
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
>>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> ok, I've manually closed it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>>>>> @Martijn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create
>>>>>> it but it's not exposed
>>>>>> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080).
>>>>>> Any clue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i
>>>>>>> will try
>>>>>>> later this evening .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long
>>>>>>>> one :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are
>>>>>>>>>> only 1,2,3 -
>>>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
>>>>>>>>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to
>>>>>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were
>>>>>>>>>>>> some things
>>>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those
>>>>>>>>>>>> are not
>>>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> project that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6
>>>>>>>>>>> months from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches today and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>>>>>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person
>>>>>>>>>>> can make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not
>>>>>>>>>>>> 100% sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> later to make
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sv...@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/)
does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module.
On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was for 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the release now this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each time with wicket.
>
> Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4 we also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there will be issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that version 4 is not available.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
>> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific to do for the release?
>>
>>
>>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>
>>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
>>>
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> ok, I've manually closed it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>>>> @Martijn
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try
>>>>>> later this evening .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 -
>>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have
>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>>>>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Andrea,
no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was for 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the release now this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each time with wicket.
Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4 we also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there will be issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that version 4 is not available.
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>
> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific to do for the release?
>
>
>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> ok, I've manually closed it.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>>> @Martijn
>>>>
>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>>>
>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try
>>>>> later this evening .
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 -
>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have
>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>>>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be
>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific to
do for the release?
On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> ok, I've manually closed it.
>>
>>
>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>> @Martijn
>>>
>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue?
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>>
>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try
>>>> later this evening .
>>>>
>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 -
>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
>>>> release
>>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have
>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Andrea,
did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>
> ok, I've manually closed it.
>
>
>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>> @Martijn
>>
>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue?
>>
>>
>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>
>>> WBR, Maxim
>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>
>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try
>>> later this evening .
>>>
>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 -
>>>>>> 3
>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
>>> release
>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have
>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be
>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make
>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
ok, I've manually closed it.
On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> @Martijn
>
> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it
> but it's not exposed
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080).
> Any clue?
>
>
> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>
>> WBR, Maxim
>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>
>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will
>> try
>> later this evening .
>>
>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> One short note:
>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only
>>>>> 1,2,3 -
>>>>> 3
>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
>>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
>> release
>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some
>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>> <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> already
>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months
>>>>>> from the
>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches
>>>>>>>> today and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> few
>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>> scripts?
>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can
>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that
>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
>>>>>>>>> <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged
>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in
>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to
>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> great
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
@Martijn
I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it but
it's not exposed
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080).
Any clue?
On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>
> WBR, Maxim
> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>
> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try
> later this evening .
>
> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
>>
>>
>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Any news on topic?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> One short note:
>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 -
>>>> 3
>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>
>>>> kind regards
>>>>
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
> release
>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>
>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> already
>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have
>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> few
>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
> scripts?
>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> possible to
>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be
>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make
> a
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Thanks a lot Andrea!
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try
later this evening .
On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
>
>
> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Any news on topic?
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> One short note:
>>>
>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 -
>>> 3
>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
release
>>>>
>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>>>>>>
>>>>> already
>>>
>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have
>>>>>> few
>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and
>>>>>>
>>>>> few
>>>
>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
scripts?
>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>
>>>>> possible to
>>>
>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yet.
>>>
>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>
>>>> time
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make
a
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>
>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try
later this evening .
On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
>
>
> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Any news on topic?
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> One short note:
>>>
>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 -
>>> 3
>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a release
>>>>
>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>>>>>>
>>>>> already
>>>
>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have
>>>>>> few
>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and
>>>>>>
>>>>> few
>>>
>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release scripts?
>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>
>>>>> possible to
>>>
>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yet.
>>>
>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>
>>>> time
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>
>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any news on topic?
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> One short note:
>>
>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 - 3
>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a release
>> so it might take some time :)
>>>
>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>
>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>> already
>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>>>> announcement).
>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have few
>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and
>> few
>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release scripts?
>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>> possible to
>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be my
>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delbene@gmail.com
>>> :
>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>> yet.
>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>> have
>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Any news on topic?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> One short note:
>
> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 - 3
> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a release
> so it might take some time :)
> >
> >
> >> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
> >> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
> >> insurmountable.
> >>
> >> Martijn
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> Hi Tobias,
> >>>
> >>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
> already
> >>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
> >>> announcement).
> >>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have few
> >>> weeks to test before making a release.
> >>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and
> few
> >>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
> >>>
> >>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release scripts?
> >>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
> possible to
> >>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
> >>> release.
> >>>
> >>> Martin Grigorov
> >>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be my
> >>>> question.
> >>>>
> >>>> kind regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Tobias
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delbene@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
> yet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Andrea.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
> >>>>>> Good to know :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
> >>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
> >>>> branches.
> >>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
> have
> >>>> time
> >>>>>>> to find any issues.
> >>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a
> >>>> release.
> >>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My 2c.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
> >>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
> >>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
> >>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
> >>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
> >>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
> >>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Have fun
> >>>>>>>>> Sven
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
> estimates? :)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax666@gmail.com
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
One short note:
eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 - 3 is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>
> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a release so it might take some time :)
>
>
>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>> insurmountable.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>
>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that already
>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>> announcement).
>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have few
>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and few
>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>
>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release scripts?
>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it possible to
>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>> release.
>>>
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be my
>>>> question.
>>>>
>>>> kind regards
>>>>
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>> branches.
>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we have
>>>> time
>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a
>>>> release.
>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a release
so it might take some time :)
On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
> insurmountable.
>
> Martijn
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that already
>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>> announcement).
>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have few
>> weeks to test before making a release.
>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and few
>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>
>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release scripts?
>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it possible to
>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>> release.
>>
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be my
>>> question.
>>>
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure yet.
>>>>
>>>> Andrea.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>
>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>> branches.
>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we have
>>> time
>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a
>>> release.
>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
insurmountable.
Martijn
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that already
> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
> announcement).
> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have few
> weeks to test before making a release.
> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and few
> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>
> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release scripts?
> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it possible to
> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
> release.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be my
>> question.
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>> > Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure yet.
>> >
>> > Andrea.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>> >>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>> >> Good to know :)
>> >>
>> >> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>> >>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>> branches.
>> >>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we have
>> time
>> >>> to find any issues.
>> >>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a
>> release.
>> >>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>> >>>
>> >>> My 2c.
>> >>>
>> >>> Martin Grigorov
>> >>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hello Sven,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>> >>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>> >>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>> >>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>> >>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> WDYT?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>> >>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>> >>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi Maxim,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> your on the right list :P
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Have fun
>> >>>>> Sven
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>> >>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> Hello All,
>> >>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>> >>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> WBR
>> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> WBR
>> >>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi Tobias,
According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that already
uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
announcement).
I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have few
weeks to test before making a release.
I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and few
days later Martijn cuts the release.
@Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release scripts?
Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it possible to
run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
release.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be my
> question.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure yet.
> >
> > Andrea.
> >
> >
> > On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
> >> Good to know :)
> >>
> >> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
> >>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
> branches.
> >>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we have
> time
> >>> to find any issues.
> >>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a
> release.
> >>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
> >>>
> >>> My 2c.
> >>>
> >>> Martin Grigorov
> >>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello Sven,
> >>>>
> >>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
> >>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
> >>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
> >>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
> >>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
> >>>>
> >>>> WDYT?
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
> >>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
> >>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Maxim,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> your on the right list :P
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Have fun
> >>>>> Sven
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> WBR, Maxim
> >>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
> >>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> WBR
> >>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
Hi
should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be my question.
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>
> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure yet.
>
> Andrea.
>
>
> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>> Good to know :)
>>
>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those branches.
>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we have time
>>> to find any issues.
>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a release.
>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>
>>> My 2c.
>>>
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>
>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>
>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>
>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>
>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have fun
>>>>> Sven
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure yet.
Andrea.
On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
> Good to know :)
>
> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those branches.
>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we have time
>> to find any issues.
>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a release.
>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>
>> My 2c.
>>
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Sven,
>>>
>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>
>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>
>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>
>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>
>>>> Have fun
>>>> Sven
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
>>>>>
>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
Good to know :)
So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those branches.
> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we have time
> to find any issues.
> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a release.
> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>
> My 2c.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Sven,
> >
> > Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
> > It was sort of scheduled [1]
> > I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
> > And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
> >
> > I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
> > Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Maxim,
> > >
> > > your on the right list :P
> > >
> > > There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
> > >
> > > Have fun
> > > Sven
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > >
> > >> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
> > >>
> > >> WBR, Maxim
> > >> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
> > >>
> > >> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello All,
> > >>>
> > >>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
> > >>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> WBR
> > >>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi,
My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
"production" branches only if we have some time to test in those branches.
I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we have time
to find any issues.
I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a release.
We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
My 2c.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Sven,
>
> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
> It was sort of scheduled [1]
> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>
> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>
> WDYT?
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > your on the right list :P
> >
> > There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
> >
> > Have fun
> > Sven
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >
> >> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
> >>
> >> WBR, Maxim
> >> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
> >>
> >> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
> >>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> WBR
> >>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Hello Sven,
Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
It was sort of scheduled [1]
I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
WDYT?
[1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> your on the right list :P
>
> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
>
> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
>>
>> WBR, Maxim
>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.
Hi Maxim,
your on the right list :P
There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
Have fun
Sven
On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
>
> WBR, Maxim
> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>
> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>