You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/12 16:56:20 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-3730) RDBDocumentStore: implement RDB-specific VersionGC support for lookup of split documents

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15484421#comment-15484421 ] 

Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-3730 at 9/12/16 4:56 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

trunk: [r1760387|http://svn.apache.org/r1760387] [r1718895|http://svn.apache.org/r1718895]
1.4: [r1760408|http://svn.apache.org/r1760408] [r1718895|http://svn.apache.org/r1718895]
1.2: [r1718962|http://svn.apache.org/r1718962]
1.0: [r1718974|http://svn.apache.org/r1718974]



was (Author: reschke):
trunk: [r1760387|http://svn.apache.org/r1760387] [r1718895|http://svn.apache.org/r1718895]
1.4: [r1718895|http://svn.apache.org/r1718895]
1.2: [r1718962|http://svn.apache.org/r1718962]
1.0: [r1718974|http://svn.apache.org/r1718974]


> RDBDocumentStore: implement RDB-specific VersionGC support for lookup of split documents
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3730
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3730
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Technical task
>          Components: rdbmk
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.9, 1.0.25, 1.3.12
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>             Fix For: 1.4, 1.3.13, 1.0.26, 1.2.10
>
>         Attachments: OAK-3730.diff, OAK-3730.diff
>
>
> This requires a change to the table layout (adding SD_TYPE and more), thus needs thought about how to migrate from older versions of the persistence.
> Edit: the actual patch avoids a table change by restricting SQL queries to IDs that can identity split documents. This approach does not rule out that we introduce the SDTYPE column at a later stage, though.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)