You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Jim Kellerman <ji...@powerset.com> on 2007/09/15 11:40:56 UTC
Re: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-1738) Hadoop-Patch build should also
compute the number of existing javadoc warnings in the pre-build stage
Yes, since javadoc warnings are now zero, let's just keep it that way.
Go ahead and close it.
-Jim
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 23:02 -0700, Nigel Daley wrote:
> I agree with Enis. I think now that the number of javadoc warnings
> is 0, we should not mask that. Also the new patch process message
> helps mitigate the problem somewhat. Jim can this be closed?
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2007, at 11:09 PM, Enis Soztutar (JIRA) wrote:
>
> >
> > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1738?
> > page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
> > tabpanel#action_12521018 ]
> >
> > Enis Soztutar commented on HADOOP-1738:
> > ---------------------------------------
> >
> > Before removing ant.jar from the lib, javadoc tool used to generate
> > no warnings. So we may want to prefer to keep the number at zero at
> > all times, instead.
> >
> >
> >> Hadoop-Patch build should also compute the number of existing
> >> javadoc warnings in the pre-build stage
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --------------------------------
> >>
> >> Key: HADOOP-1738
> >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
> >> HADOOP-1738
> >> Project: Hadoop
> >> Issue Type: Improvement
> >> Components: build
> >> Affects Versions: 0.15.0
> >> Reporter: Jim Kellerman
> >> Priority: Minor
> >> Fix For: 0.15.0
> >>
> >>
> >> The Hadoop-Patch build does a "pre-build" phase to determine the
> >> number of javac and findbugs warnings so it can tell if the patch
> >> generates new warnings:
> >> ########################################################
> >> Pre-building trunk to determine current
> >> number of javac and Findbugs warnings
> >> ########################################################
> >> It would be nice if it also computed the number of javadoc
> >> warnings so that a new test would not get a -1 because javadoc
> >> warnings already exist.
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > -
> > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> >
>
--
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
jim@powerset.com