You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/04/01 03:32:52 UTC
[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13373) Squash HFileReaderV3 together with
HFileReaderV2 and AbstractHFileReader; ditto for Scanners and BlockReader,
etc.
stack created HBASE-13373:
-----------------------------
Summary: Squash HFileReaderV3 together with HFileReaderV2 and AbstractHFileReader; ditto for Scanners and BlockReader, etc.
Key: HBASE-13373
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13373
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: stack
Profiling I actually ran into case where complaint that could not inline because:
MaxInlineLevel maximum number of nested calls that are inlined 9 intx
i.e. method was more than 9 levels deep.
The HFileReaderV? with Abstracts is not needed anymore now we are into the clear with V3 enabled since hbase 1.0.0; we can have just an Interface and an implementation. If we need to support a new hfile type, can hopefully do it in a backward compatible way now we have Cell Interface, etc.
Squashing all this stuff together actually makes it easier figuring what is going on when reading code. I can also get rid of a bunch of duplication too.
Attached is a WIP. Doesn't fully compile yet but you get the idea.
I'll keep on unless objection. Will try it against data written with old classes as soon as I have something working. I don't believe we write classnames into our data.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)