Re: Beware changeset [830795] (re)introduces a large memory leak into ode

[Alexis Midon <mi...@intalio.com>]

FYI Sean reverted ODE-689.

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Ciaran <ci...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you're syncing to svn HEAD on the 1_X branch you may want to skip
> this changeset as it appears to create a rather large memory leak.
> With this changeset reverted my QA tests are ok, with it in place I
> rapidly run out of memory.
>
> Unfortunately I've not got the time to track down why the leak occurs
> this time so its more of a heads-up for anyone who is syncing to the
> branch HEAD.  My processes are all in-memory processes so it is
> possible this does not affect persisted processes.
>
> Also ;)  Any word on when http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-647
> might have some commits, I'm getting bored of hacking my war file each
> time I build :)
>
> Thanks guys
> - cj.
>

Re: Beware changeset [830795] (re)introduces a large memory leak into ode

[Ciaran <ci...@gmail.com>]

Cool, were you able to reproduce this issue yourselves then ?
-cj.

On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Alexis Midon <mi...@intalio.com> wrote:
> FYI Sean reverted ODE-689.
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Ciaran <ci...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If you're syncing to svn HEAD on the 1_X branch you may want to skip
>> this changeset as it appears to create a rather large memory leak.
>> With this changeset reverted my QA tests are ok, with it in place I
>> rapidly run out of memory.
>>
>> Unfortunately I've not got the time to track down why the leak occurs
>> this time so its more of a heads-up for anyone who is syncing to the
>> branch HEAD.  My processes are all in-memory processes so it is
>> possible this does not affect persisted processes.
>>
>> Also ;)  Any word on when http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-647
>> might have some commits, I'm getting bored of hacking my war file each
>> time I build :)
>>
>> Thanks guys
>> - cj.
>>
>