You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> on 2006/01/17 06:20:04 UTC
[all] The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft)
On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien <to...@discursive.com> wrote:
<snip/>
>
> ...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to join the W3C, but
> we're currently not a Member organization.
<snap/>
FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
the ASF and the W3C, and IMO, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
member.
If we stare at the W3C member list ...
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List
... we see members such as:
* OASIS
* Mozilla
and it is probably time to float this thought at the ASF.
So, a couple of questions:
* Anyone else has any views on this?
* What would be the appropriate ASF forum to begin this conversation?
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [all] The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft)
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 1/18/06, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 1/18/06, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
<snip/>
> >
> > Cool, looks like this isn't the first time someone thought about this
> > (as I was fully expecting). Need to find the right people at either
> > end to see if we can make any further progress ...
>
>
> At this end, I'd suggest starting with community@a.o, since that covers
> people on all projects. Certainly commons-dev isn't the right place for a
> broad audience. ;-)
>
<snap/>
Just testing the waters ;-) Will go to community@ in a day or two
then, and might ping general@xml about the thread on community@ since
I tend to agree to an extent with Paul (and all of them might not be
on community@)
-Rahul
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> -Rahul
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [all] The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft)
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On 1/18/06, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/18/06, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
> > Remembered there was a discussion about membership of the w3c. A quick
> search gave me only this
> > though :
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2001/board_minutes_2001_10_17.txt
> >
> <snip/>
>
> Cool, looks like this isn't the first time someone thought about this
> (as I was fully expecting). Need to find the right people at either
> end to see if we can make any further progress ...
At this end, I'd suggest starting with community@a.o, since that covers
people on all projects. Certainly commons-dev isn't the right place for a
broad audience. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
-Rahul
>
>
> > Mvgr,
> > Martin
> >
> <snap/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: [all] The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft)
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 1/18/06, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
> Remembered there was a discussion about membership of the w3c. A quick search gave me only this
> though : http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2001/board_minutes_2001_10_17.txt
>
<snip/>
Cool, looks like this isn't the first time someone thought about this
(as I was fully expecting). Need to find the right people at either
end to see if we can make any further progress ...
-Rahul
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
<snap/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [all] The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: [scxml] compliance with SCXML
Working Draft)
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
Remembered there was a discussion about membership of the w3c. A quick search gave me only this
though : http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2001/board_minutes_2001_10_17.txt
Mvgr,
Martin
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 1/18/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
>
>>You definitely need to send such a wish to the general xml list at least.
>
> <snip/>
>
> Sounds good, thanks. Will move this to general@xml when I get a chance.
>
>
>
>>Note also much w3c interaction can be done without membership...
>>
>
> <snap/>
>
> True, though the members only sections interest me, and may possibly
> be of interest to others as well. I'll ask.
>
> -Rahul
>
>
>
>>paul
>>
>>Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>
>>>On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien <to...@discursive.com> wrote:
>>><snip/>
>>>
>>>>...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to join the W3C, but
>>>>we're currently not a Member organization.
>>>>
>>>
>>><snap/>
>>>
>>>FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
>>>an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
>>>the ASF and the W3C, and IMO, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
>>>member.
>
> <snip/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [all] The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft)
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 1/18/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> You definitely need to send such a wish to the general xml list at least.
<snip/>
Sounds good, thanks. Will move this to general@xml when I get a chance.
> Note also much w3c interaction can be done without membership...
>
<snap/>
True, though the members only sections interest me, and may possibly
be of interest to others as well. I'll ask.
-Rahul
> paul
>
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien <to...@discursive.com> wrote:
> > <snip/>
> >
> >> ...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to join the W3C, but
> >> we're currently not a Member organization.
> >>
> > <snap/>
> >
> > FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
> > an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
> > the ASF and the W3C, and IMO, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
> > member.
<snip/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [all] The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: [scxml] compliance with SCXML
Working Draft)
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
You definitely need to send such a wish to the general xml list at least.
Note also much w3c interaction can be done without membership...
paul
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien <to...@discursive.com> wrote:
> <snip/>
>
>> ...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to join the W3C, but
>> we're currently not a Member organization.
>>
> <snap/>
>
> FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
> an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
> the ASF and the W3C, and IMO, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
> member.
>
> If we stare at the W3C member list ...
>
> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List
>
> ... we see members such as:
>
> * OASIS
> * Mozilla
>
> and it is probably time to float this thought at the ASF.
>
> So, a couple of questions:
>
> * Anyone else has any views on this?
> * What would be the appropriate ASF forum to begin this conversation?
>
> -Rahul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org