Re: [VOTE] KIP-225 - Use tags for consumer “records.lag” metrics

[Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io>]

Hi, Charly,

Thanks for the proposal. Since the per partition level metric is likely not
widely used, it's probably better to fix the metric name and make it more
consistent. +1 from me.

We probably want to document this change in the upgrade section.

Jun


On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:45 AM, charly molter <ch...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just a reminder that this vote is open. Let me know if you think this is
> not a valuable change.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:48 AM, charly molter <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start the voting thread for KIP-225.
> > This KIP proposes to correct some lag metrics emitted by the consumer.
> >
> > The KIP wiki is here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/uaBzB
> >
> > The discussion thread is here:
> > http://search-hadoop.com/m/Kafka/uyzND1F33uL19AYx/threaded
> >
> > Also could someone assign me to this Jira: KAFKA-5890
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5890>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Charly Molter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Charly Molter
>