You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@curator.apache.org by "Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/05/05 22:09:01 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (CURATOR-211) Fix InterProcessReadWriteLock#readLockPredicate() index validation issue

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jordan Zimmerman resolved CURATOR-211.
--------------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: awaiting-response)
                   2.8.0

> Fix InterProcessReadWriteLock#readLockPredicate() index validation issue
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CURATOR-211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-211
>             Project: Apache Curator
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Recipes
>    Affects Versions: awaiting-response
>         Environment: All platforms
>            Reporter: Alexander Makarenko
>            Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
>              Labels: easyfix, patch
>             Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>
> Hello, guys! I noticed a small bug in {{InterProcessReadWriteLock#readLockPredicate()}} method:
> {code:title=InterProcessReadWriteLock.java, lines 196-211|borderStyle=solid}
> int         ourIndex = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
> for ( String node : children )
> {
>     if ( node.contains(WRITE_LOCK_NAME) )
>     {
>         firstWriteIndex = Math.min(index, firstWriteIndex);
>     }
>     else if ( node.startsWith(sequenceNodeName) )
>     {
>         ourIndex = index;
>         break;
>     }
>     ++index;
> }
> StandardLockInternalsDriver.validateOurIndex(sequenceNodeName, ourIndex);
> {code}
> In case if {{sequenceNodeName}} is not in {{children}} list, {{StandardLockInternalsDriver.validateOurIndex()}} won't throw exception, because {{ourIndex}} in this case equals to {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}}.
> I'm creating pull request on Github to fix this issue.
> I know it's a very rare case, but why not fix it anyways?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)