[GitHub] [pulsar] srkukarni opened a new pull request #4250: Added an explicit field in the function details for componenttype

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

srkukarni opened a new pull request #4250: Added an explicit field in the function details for componenttype
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/4250
 
 
   ### Motivation
   Sources/Sinks/Functions all use the same underlying representation of FunctionDetails to store their metadata. This is currently missing a componentType, which tells whether its a function/source/sink. Right now we kind of infer it with some heuristics but its better to explicitly mark it. This pr adds that field.
   
   ### Modifications
   
   *Describe the modifications you've done.*
   
   ### Verifying this change
   
   - [ ] Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.
   
   *(Please pick either of the following options)*
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe tests)*.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
   *(example:)*
     - *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)*
     - *Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure*
   
   ### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
   *If `yes` was chosen, please highlight the changes*
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
     - The public API: (yes / no)
     - The schema: (yes / no / don't know)
     - The default values of configurations: (yes / no)
     - The wire protocol: (yes / no)
     - The rest endpoints: (yes / no)
     - The admin cli options: (yes / no)
     - Anything that affects deployment: (yes / no / don't know)
   
   ### Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
     - If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
     - If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services