Re: BZ and rules

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


"Loren Wilton" writes:
> >   You know, I don't know if there'd be a separate bugzilla.  good
> >   question... I think the mostly likely thing would be that the rules
> >   project stuff would be under the (existing) Rules component in BZ.
> 
> I don't know that BZ would get much use or be of much use in day to day
> rules testing and making.  But I don't see a problem with it existing.
> 
> It certainly is useful for customers to report their perceived bugs with
> existing rules, and perhaps useful for someone to now and then submit a rule
> suggestion.  This I suspect would mostly be used by people who don't follow
> Dev and aren't aware of the existance of the rules subproject.  (No reason
> an SA user should know anything about how rules come into existance.)
> 
> It might be useful to make sure that we have all of our ducks in a row when
> it comes release time, if that concept applies to rules; and it seems to me
> that it does, when a new version of SA is released.
> 
> It is probably or possibly is also good for documenting the rules scoring
> for a release.

yep -- all very good points in my opinion.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFDTxqbMJF5cimLx9ARAggGAJ0fYpxOAe7KBw+BaH7g9NNssiEZgQCeM/8m
qYb/PHdDRuuB/ZQm5/ETTIA=
=BoEU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----