You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-commits@db.apache.org by tm...@apache.org on 2007/10/11 15:54:17 UTC

svn commit: r583825 - /db/derby/docs/trunk/src/ref/rrefsqlj13590.dita

Author: tmnk
Date: Thu Oct 11 06:54:17 2007
New Revision: 583825

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=583825&view=rev
Log:
- DERBY-3121 The description of CONSTRAINT clause in reference manual seems to have error - Patch by Kim Haase (camilla dot haase at sun dot com)

Modified:
    db/derby/docs/trunk/src/ref/rrefsqlj13590.dita

Modified: db/derby/docs/trunk/src/ref/rrefsqlj13590.dita
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/derby/docs/trunk/src/ref/rrefsqlj13590.dita?rev=583825&r1=583824&r2=583825&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- db/derby/docs/trunk/src/ref/rrefsqlj13590.dita (original)
+++ db/derby/docs/trunk/src/ref/rrefsqlj13590.dita Thu Oct 11 06:54:17 2007
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
 dependent tables for foreign key constraints. If any row in a dependent table
 violates a foreign key constraint, the transaction is rolled back. </p> <p>If
 the update rule is NO ACTION, <ph conref="../conrefs.dita#prod/productshortname"></ph> checks
-the dependent tables for foreign key constraints <i>after</i> all deletes
+the dependent tables for foreign key constraints <i>after</i> all updates
 have been executed but <i>before</i> triggers have been executed. If any row
 in a dependent table violates a foreign key constraint, the statement is rejected.</p> <p>When
 a value in a column of the dependent table is updated, and that value is part