You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Christian Schneider (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/12/24 16:48:30 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CXF-3983) OSGi configs for WorkQueues should
use the ManagedServiceFactory pattern
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13175738#comment-13175738 ]
Christian Schneider commented on CXF-3983:
------------------------------------------
Code already committed. Keeping the issue open as we need to provide a migration from the old config style
> OSGi configs for WorkQueues should use the ManagedServiceFactory pattern
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-3983
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3983
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: OSGi
> Affects Versions: 2.5.1
> Reporter: Christian Schneider
> Assignee: Christian Schneider
> Fix For: 2.5.2
>
>
> Currently all Workqueue configs are read from one config pid.
> The name of the work queue is part of the attribute name.
> In the config admin service configs for several objects are better handled using the ManagedServiceFactory pattern. So each work queue can be configured in a separate pid. So I propose to change the code to use this pattern.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira