You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> on 2005/08/26 21:59:26 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-924) PolicyConfigurationFactory should use TCCL to load its implementation
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-924?page=all ]
David Jencks resolved GERONIMO-924:
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
code checked in, but this requires a version change to the spec jacc module to rc5-SNAPSHOT. Will close when we are sure we like this change and change version to rc6
Sending etc/project.properties
Sending modules/security/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/security/SecurityServiceImpl.java
Sending modules/security/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/security/jacc/ApplicationPolicyConfigurationManager.java
Sending specs/j2ee-jacc/src/java/javax/security/jacc/PolicyConfigurationFactory.java
Transmitting file data ....
Committed revision 240324.
Checking in etc/project.properties;
new revision: 1.48; previous revision: 1.47
> PolicyConfigurationFactory should use TCCL to load its implementation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-924
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-924
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: Bug
> Components: specs
> Versions: 1.0-M5
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Assignee: David Jencks
> Fix For: 1.0-M5
>
> You can easily get into trouble trying to load a non-geronimo PolicyConfigurationFactory implementation. This is easy to fix if the PolicyConfigurationFactory uses the TCCL rather than Class.forName. Changing to use the TCCL seems consistent with the tck.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira