You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-user@james.apache.org by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com> on 2002/09/24 19:56:55 UTC
James 2.1a1 refresh
> Also, please note that the current james2.1a1-2002-09-19 download is
corrupt and
> should be avoided until it is replaced with a newer, corrected version.
Oh my ... that was the jar juggling version? Yes, please let's get that
updated!
And shouldn't the 2.1aX number get incremented so that we don't have to ask
WHICH 2.1a1 version they are using? :-)
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: James 2.1a1 refresh
Posted by Danny Angus <da...@apache.org>.
AFAIK the numbers only increment on a release made with avote, a plan and an
announcement, anything else isn't supported and is just a build, therefore
latest builds are simply that a dated build of cvs.
releases will increment version numbers in proportion to the scope of the
changes, the "a" indicates that this will be the Alpha 1 release of version
2.1
(I think we can probably do better than this, but it works ok, in that the
numbers increase, and we can distinguish versions)
d.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: 24 September 2002 19:48
> To: James Users List
> Subject: RE: James 2.1a1 refresh
>
>
> OK ... what is the "a1" for, as opposed to James 2.1-2002-09-19? Just
> trying to understand the rationale behind the labeling.
>
> --- Noel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:danny@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 14:18
> To: James Users List
> Subject: RE: James 2.1a1 refresh
>
>
> thats what the datestamp is for
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> > Sent: 24 September 2002 18:57
> > To: James Users List; farsight@alum.mit.edu
> > Subject: James 2.1a1 refresh
> >
> >
> > > Also, please note that the current james2.1a1-2002-09-19 download is
> > corrupt and
> > > should be avoided until it is replaced with a newer,
> corrected version.
> >
> > Oh my ... that was the jar juggling version? Yes, please let's get that
> > updated!
> >
> > And shouldn't the 2.1aX number get incremented so that we don't
> > have to ask
> > WHICH 2.1a1 version they are using? :-)
> >
> > --- Noel
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: James 2.1a1 refresh
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
OK ... what is the "a1" for, as opposed to James 2.1-2002-09-19? Just
trying to understand the rationale behind the labeling.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Angus [mailto:danny@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 14:18
To: James Users List
Subject: RE: James 2.1a1 refresh
thats what the datestamp is for
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: 24 September 2002 18:57
> To: James Users List; farsight@alum.mit.edu
> Subject: James 2.1a1 refresh
>
>
> > Also, please note that the current james2.1a1-2002-09-19 download is
> corrupt and
> > should be avoided until it is replaced with a newer, corrected version.
>
> Oh my ... that was the jar juggling version? Yes, please let's get that
> updated!
>
> And shouldn't the 2.1aX number get incremented so that we don't
> have to ask
> WHICH 2.1a1 version they are using? :-)
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: James 2.1a1 refresh
Posted by Danny Angus <da...@apache.org>.
thats what the datestamp is for
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: 24 September 2002 18:57
> To: James Users List; farsight@alum.mit.edu
> Subject: James 2.1a1 refresh
>
>
> > Also, please note that the current james2.1a1-2002-09-19 download is
> corrupt and
> > should be avoided until it is replaced with a newer, corrected version.
>
> Oh my ... that was the jar juggling version? Yes, please let's get that
> updated!
>
> And shouldn't the 2.1aX number get incremented so that we don't
> have to ask
> WHICH 2.1a1 version they are using? :-)
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>