You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@stdcxx.apache.org by "Farid Zaripov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/03/25 09:31:24 UTC

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-794) The non-template __rw_atomic_xxx() functions should accept the volatile reference

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-794:
---------------------------------

              Priority: Trivial  (was: Major)
    Remaining Estimate: 1h
     Original Estimate: 1h

> The non-template __rw_atomic_xxx() functions should accept the volatile reference
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STDCXX-794
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-794
>             Project: C++ Standard Library
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.2.0
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Farid Zaripov
>            Assignee: Farid Zaripov
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 5.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> Currently the __rw_atomic_xxx() functions are accepting the non-volatile reference as parameter. And if volatile reference is passed, the template version of __rw_atomic_xxx() (implemented with using the mutex object) is used.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.