You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@thrift.apache.org by Jim King <Ji...@simplivity.com> on 2016/07/14 15:12:52 UTC
0.9.x to 0.10.x - sorting
Will this version change represent a problem for some build systems that use lexicographical sorting on version strings?
Any reason not to go from 0.9.x to 1.0.0?
[Description: Description: simplivity-lg-xsmall]
James E. King, III
Architect
8 Technology Drive, 2nd Floor
Westborough, MA 01581-1756
Ph: 855-SVT-INFO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIVACY STATEMENT:
This message is a PRIVATE communication. This message and all attachments are a private communication sent by SimpliVity and are considered to be confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in or attached to this message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: 0.9.x to 0.10.x - sorting
Posted by Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org>.
Agree, we still have some work to do before we tag 1.0, do not want to rush
it and would like to get to a better release cadence first before
considering a 1.0 rc
-Jake
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Randy Abernethy <randy.abernethy@gmail.com
> wrote:
> semantically 1.0 is a lot different from 0.10. I would not +1 a v1.0
> release just yet.
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jim King <Ji...@simplivity.com> wrote:
>
> > Will this version change represent a problem for some build systems that
> > use lexicographical sorting on version strings?
> >
> > Any reason not to go from 0.9.x to 1.0.0?
> >
> >
> >
> > [image: Description: Description: simplivity-lg-xsmall]
> >
> > James E. King, III
> >
> > Architect
> >
> > 8 Technology Drive, 2nd Floor
> > Westborough, MA 01581-1756
> >
> > Ph: 855-SVT-INFO
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > PRIVACY STATEMENT:
> > This message is a PRIVATE communication. This message and all attachments
> > are a private communication sent by SimpliVity and are considered to be
> > confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> > distribution or use of the information contained in or attached to this
> > message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery
> > error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
> > For more information please visit http://www.simplivity.com
> > ------------------------------
> >
>
Re: 0.9.x to 0.10.x - sorting
Posted by Randy Abernethy <ra...@gmail.com>.
semantically 1.0 is a lot different from 0.10. I would not +1 a v1.0
release just yet.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jim King <Ji...@simplivity.com> wrote:
> Will this version change represent a problem for some build systems that
> use lexicographical sorting on version strings?
>
> Any reason not to go from 0.9.x to 1.0.0?
>
>
>
> [image: Description: Description: simplivity-lg-xsmall]
>
> James E. King, III
>
> Architect
>
> 8 Technology Drive, 2nd Floor
> Westborough, MA 01581-1756
>
> Ph: 855-SVT-INFO
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> PRIVACY STATEMENT:
> This message is a PRIVATE communication. This message and all attachments
> are a private communication sent by SimpliVity and are considered to be
> confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or use of the information contained in or attached to this
> message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery
> error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
> For more information please visit http://www.simplivity.com
> ------------------------------
>