Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0

[Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>]

On 11/22/2010 08:23 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 12:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Carl 
>> Trieloff<cc...@redhat.com>  wrote:
>>> Jim,
>>>
>>>   I remember at one point there was a discussion that if 3 mentors 
>>> +1'ed on
>>> this
>>> list, then the IPMC only needs to be notified. If there are not 3 
>>> member
>>> votes then
>>> the vote needs to be had on the incubator list. Did that discussion go
>>> anywhere
>>> (do you know)... i.e. if that is an option there are enough mentors 
>>> on the
>>> project
>>> to complete the vote on the dev list and we should ping the mentors.
>>>
>>> What is the current state on this in incubator?
>>> Carl.
>> While in Incubator, you need to request IPMC approval for releases. If
>> you already have the 3 binding IPMC votes, then it's just a matter of
>> waiting the 72hrs period in the general@ list.
>
>
> I've spent a bit of time looking through the release.
>
> Few issues:
>
> - It is common practice to have the ASL license header in the top of 
> all source
> files in the release. I would like to see that we follow that common 
> practice.
>
> For example server.ru and deltacloud.rb in the core package have no 
> license headers,
> the client tz seems to be much better applied with license headers 
> than core.
>
> - The release will also need to be signed to pass IPMC review.
>
> If the above two issues are resolved I'll +1 the release.
>
> Carl.
>
>
>


After some discussion with Jim, it is understood that we can add the 
headers in the
next release as we have the main license file. I'm thus placing my +1 vote.

+1 -- release deltacloud.

Carl.

Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0

["marios@redhat.com" <ma...@redhat.com>]

I believe Michal went through the code and sent out some patches with 
the missing license headers ("[PATCH core] Added ASF license header to 
files" 23 Nov). These have been acked so they should be in the latest 
version of core soon


marios


On 07/12/10 16:57, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 08:23 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>> On 11/19/2010 12:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Carl Trieloff<cc...@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Jim,
>>>>
>>>> I remember at one point there was a discussion that if 3 mentors
>>>> +1'ed on
>>>> this
>>>> list, then the IPMC only needs to be notified. If there are not 3
>>>> member
>>>> votes then
>>>> the vote needs to be had on the incubator list. Did that discussion go
>>>> anywhere
>>>> (do you know)... i.e. if that is an option there are enough mentors
>>>> on the
>>>> project
>>>> to complete the vote on the dev list and we should ping the mentors.
>>>>
>>>> What is the current state on this in incubator?
>>>> Carl.
>>> While in Incubator, you need to request IPMC approval for releases. If
>>> you already have the 3 binding IPMC votes, then it's just a matter of
>>> waiting the 72hrs period in the general@ list.
>>
>>
>> I've spent a bit of time looking through the release.
>>
>> Few issues:
>>
>> - It is common practice to have the ASL license header in the top of
>> all source
>> files in the release. I would like to see that we follow that common
>> practice.
>>
>> For example server.ru and deltacloud.rb in the core package have no
>> license headers,
>> the client tz seems to be much better applied with license headers
>> than core.
>>
>> - The release will also need to be signed to pass IPMC review.
>>
>> If the above two issues are resolved I'll +1 the release.
>>
>> Carl.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> After some discussion with Jim, it is understood that we can add the
> headers in the
> next release as we have the main license file. I'm thus placing my +1 vote.
>
> +1 -- release deltacloud.
>
> Carl.
>
>