You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Herve Boutemy (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2012/09/29 02:27:36 UTC
[jira] (MJAVADOC-354) isValidJavadocLink is too strict: doesn't
support unnamed package
Herve Boutemy created MJAVADOC-354:
--------------------------------------
Summary: isValidJavadocLink is too strict: doesn't support unnamed package
Key: MJAVADOC-354
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-354
Project: Maven 2.x Javadoc Plugin
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.8
Reporter: Herve Boutemy
see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201209.mbox/%3C50661F5A.5050302@apache.org%3E
because of MPLUGIN-227, we start to see such "unnamed" package in package-list
m-javadoc-p needs to be tolerant to this use case, which is valid but not supported by MJAVADOC-283
even if having code in unnamed package is either a bad practice or the result of a m-plugin-p bug... :)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] (MJAVADOC-354) isValidJavadocLink is too strict: doesn't
support unnamed package
Posted by "Herve Boutemy (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
[ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Herve Boutemy closed MJAVADOC-354.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9.1
Assignee: Herve Boutemy
fixed in [r1391706|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1391706&view=rev]
> isValidJavadocLink is too strict: doesn't support unnamed package
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MJAVADOC-354
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-354
> Project: Maven 2.x Javadoc Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.8
> Reporter: Herve Boutemy
> Assignee: Herve Boutemy
> Fix For: 2.9.1
>
>
> see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201209.mbox/%3C50661F5A.5050302@apache.org%3E
> because of MPLUGIN-227, we start to see such "unnamed" package in package-list
>
> m-javadoc-p needs to be tolerant to this use case, which is valid but not supported by MJAVADOC-283
> even if having code in unnamed package is either a bad practice or the result of a m-plugin-p bug... :)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira