Re: svn commit: r751910 - in /openjpa/trunk: openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/conf/ openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/kernel/ openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/meta/ openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/or

[Michael Dick <mi...@gmail.com>]

As (one of) the leading advocate(s) of this change I'm perhaps easily swayed
by Pinaki's argument regarding the compatibility option.

That said I understand that many people have strong feelings on this issue
and additional discussion may be needed.

Craig, do you have a specific concern with Pinaki's changes, or can we leave
the JIRA open an discuss there?

-mike

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Pinaki Poddar <pp...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> Hi Craig,
>  I understand your concerns because I had similar ones. That is why this
> change does retain the past behavior exactly as it was. The user only
> requires the following configuration to get exactly the same behavior
>   openjpa.Compatibility=FlushBeforeDetach=true,CopyOnDetach=true
>
>   In fact, JDO having a separate signature as detachCopy() is a good news
> because then we can add the same signature to Broker so that the user will
> not even need the above configuration for backward compatible behavior.
>
>  Regards --
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r751910---in--openjpa-trunk%3A-openjpa-kernel-src-main-java-org-apache-openjpa-conf--openjpa-kernel-src-main-java-org-apache-openjpa-kernel--openjpa-kernel-src-main-java-org-apache-tp2458104p2458226.html
> Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>