You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by Andreas Knecht <an...@atlassian.com> on 2007/07/20 08:32:41 UTC
Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA
Hi,
We're about to upgrade Lucene from version 1.9.1 to version 2.2.0 in
JIRA <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira>. We've already switched
from DateFields to DateTools (which will require a complete re-index for
all of our customers).
Are there any problems we should be aware of that could cause problems
with this upgrade? (which wont be fixed by a full re-index)
Cheers,
Andreas
--
ATLASSIAN
Our products help over 7,000 organisations in more than 88 countries to collaborate. http://www.atlassian.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA
Posted by Dmitry <dm...@hotmail.com>.
Andreas,
Thanks, I get it now.
www.ejinz.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Knecht" <an...@atlassian.com>
To: <ja...@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 2:23 AM
Subject: Re: Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> The full re-index is necessary, because DateTools stores dates in a
> different (human-readable) format in the index. This means that
> JIRA/lucene wont be able to read dates from the current indexes which use
> dates stored in the old format.
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>> Folks,
>> why do we need full re0indexing during the switch from DateFields to
>> DateTools ? I'll have the same issue in future may be?
>> Thanks,
>> Dm
>> www.ejinz.com
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Knecht"
>> <an...@atlassian.com>
>> To: <ja...@lucene.apache.org>
>> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:32 AM
>> Subject: Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We're about to upgrade Lucene from version 1.9.1 to version 2.2.0 in
>>> JIRA <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira>. We've already switched
>>> from DateFields to DateTools (which will require a complete re-index for
>>> all of our customers).
>>> Are there any problems we should be aware of that could cause problems
>>> with this upgrade? (which wont be fixed by a full re-index)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> --
>>> ATLASSIAN
>>> Our products help over 7,000 organisations in more than 88 countries to
>>> collaborate. http://www.atlassian.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> ATLASSIAN
> Our products help over 7,000 organisations in more than 88 countries to
> collaborate. http://www.atlassian.com/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA
Posted by Andreas Knecht <an...@atlassian.com>.
Hi Dmitry,
The full re-index is necessary, because DateTools stores dates in a
different (human-readable) format in the index. This means that
JIRA/lucene wont be able to read dates from the current indexes which
use dates stored in the old format.
Cheers,
Andreas
> Folks,
> why do we need full re0indexing during the switch from DateFields to
> DateTools ? I'll have the same issue in future may be?
> Thanks,
> Dm
> www.ejinz.com
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Knecht"
> <an...@atlassian.com>
> To: <ja...@lucene.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:32 AM
> Subject: Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're about to upgrade Lucene from version 1.9.1 to version 2.2.0 in
>> JIRA <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira>. We've already switched
>> from DateFields to DateTools (which will require a complete re-index
>> for all of our customers).
>> Are there any problems we should be aware of that could cause
>> problems with this upgrade? (which wont be fixed by a full re-index)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andreas
>>
>> --
>> ATLASSIAN
>> Our products help over 7,000 organisations in more than 88 countries
>> to collaborate. http://www.atlassian.com/
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
ATLASSIAN
Our products help over 7,000 organisations in more than 88 countries to collaborate. http://www.atlassian.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA
Posted by Dmitry <dm...@hotmail.com>.
Folks,
why do we need full re0indexing during the switch from DateFields to
DateTools ? I'll have the same issue in future may be?
Thanks,
Dm
www.ejinz.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Knecht" <an...@atlassian.com>
To: <ja...@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:32 AM
Subject: Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA
> Hi,
>
> We're about to upgrade Lucene from version 1.9.1 to version 2.2.0 in JIRA
> <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira>. We've already switched from
> DateFields to DateTools (which will require a complete re-index for all of
> our customers).
> Are there any problems we should be aware of that could cause problems
> with this upgrade? (which wont be fixed by a full re-index)
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
> --
> ATLASSIAN
> Our products help over 7,000 organisations in more than 88 countries to
> collaborate. http://www.atlassian.com/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org