You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> on 2011/02/15 09:59:13 UTC
[VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release
out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all
of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA
site [2] for review as well.
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so
a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
[1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com>.
yes it's easy - you just have to add the profile.
e.g. in case of codi: clean deploy -Pextended-manifest
(at "Goals und Optionen")
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/15 Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
> Yeah... This makes more sense to me. Only nightly builds really need this
> info and it should be easy enough to add the custom profile to Hudson (or
> whatever they're calling it these days).. :)
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> currently codi uses a profile for activating it for nightly builds (see
> [1]).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/pom.xml>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/pom.xml
>
> <http://www.irian.at>http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
> 2011/2/15 Scott O'Bryan < <da...@gmail.com>
>
>> This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code.
>> Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of
>> tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to
>> commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number to be
>> calculated.
>>
>> What do we use this for, debugging? If so, I'm wondering if we could
>> only allow this to be executed with snapshots and allow everything
>> else to be unknown..
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorff < <ma...@apache.org>
>> matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
>> > < <rd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Matthias,
>> >>
>> >> Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
>> >> apache-release?
>> >
>> > it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
>> > from a TAG,
>> > hence the revision is known.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN
>> client
>> >> installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
>> >> projects.
>> >
>> > I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
>> >
>> > -Matthias
>> >
>> >>
>> >> regards
>> >> Rudy.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann <<b...@googlemail.com>
>> bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello Matze,
>> >>>
>> >>> good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
>> >>> to 'unkown'.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards
>> >>>
>> >>> Bernd
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <<m...@apache.org>
>> matzew@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> Downloaded the source:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
>> >>>>
>> >>>> did an unzip and "mvn clean install"
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I am getting this "error":
>> >>>> [INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
>> >>>> [INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
>> >>>> [INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
>> >>>> [INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
>> >>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api &&
>> >>>> svn --non-interactive info
>> >>>> [INFO] Working directory:
>> >>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
>> >>>> Provider message:
>> >>>> The svn command failed.
>> >>>> Command output:
>> >>>> svn: '.' is not a working copy
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [INFO]
>> >>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
>> >>>> [INFO]
>> >>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> [INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
>> >>>> Error!
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is due to the "buildnumber-maven-plugin", not sure if that
>> should
>> >>>> be really _always_ enabled...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
>> >>>> folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
>> >>>> not "SVN folder".
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Any hints?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Matthias
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan <<d...@gmail.com>
>> darkarena@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>> +1
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> >>>>>> [ ] +0
>> >>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>> >>>>>> released,
>> >>>>>> and why..............
>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>> Scott
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hey all,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
>> >>>>>>> release
>> >>>>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or
>> not.
>> >>>>>>> This
>> >>>>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but
>> all
>> >>>>>>> of the
>> >>>>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
>> >>>>>>> testing.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for
>> review.
>> >>>>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on
>> the
>> >>>>>>> JIRA
>> >>>>>>> site [2] for review as well.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>> Scott O'Bryan
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to
>> NEXUS,
>> >>>>>>> so a
>> >>>>>>> lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> [1]
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>> >>>>>>> [2]
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> <<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>> >
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>> >>>>
>> >>>> blog: <http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/>
>> http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> >>>> sessions: <http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
>> http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> >>>> twitter: <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>
>> http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: <http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/>
>> http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: <http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
>> http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Yeah... This makes more sense to me. Only nightly builds really need this
info and it should be easy enough to add the custom profile to Hudson (or
whatever they're calling it these days).. :)
On Feb 15, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
currently codi uses a profile for activating it for nightly builds (see
[1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/pom.xml
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/15 Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
> This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code.
> Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of
> tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to
> commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number to be
> calculated.
>
> What do we use this for, debugging? If so, I'm wondering if we could
> only allow this to be executed with snapshots and allow everything
> else to be unknown..
>
> Scott
>
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorff <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
> > <rd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Matthias,
> >>
> >> Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
> >> apache-release?
> >
> > it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
> > from a TAG,
> > hence the revision is known.
> >
> >>
> >> It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
> >> installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
> >> projects.
> >
> > I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >>
> >> regards
> >> Rudy.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann <be...@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello Matze,
> >>>
> >>> good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
> >>> to 'unkown'.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> Bernd
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <
> matzew@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Downloaded the source:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
> >>>>
> >>>> did an unzip and "mvn clean install"
> >>>>
> >>>> I am getting this "error":
> >>>> [INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
> >>>> [INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
> >>>> [INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
> >>>> [INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
> >>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api &&
> >>>> svn --non-interactive info
> >>>> [INFO] Working directory:
> >>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
> >>>> Provider message:
> >>>> The svn command failed.
> >>>> Command output:
> >>>> svn: '.' is not a working copy
> >>>>
> >>>> [INFO]
> >>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> >>>> [INFO]
> >>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> [INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
> >>>> Error!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> This is due to the "buildnumber-maven-plugin", not sure if that should
> >>>> be really _always_ enabled...
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
> >>>> folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
> >>>> not "SVN folder".
> >>>>
> >>>> Any hints?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> >>>>>> [ ] +0
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> >>>>>> released,
> >>>>>> and why..............
> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Scott
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
> >>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or
> not.
> >>>>>>> This
> >>>>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all
> >>>>>>> of the
> >>>>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
> >>>>>>> testing.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for
> review.
> >>>>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
> >>>>>>> JIRA
> >>>>>>> site [2] for review as well.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Scott O'Bryan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to
> NEXUS,
> >>>>>>> so a
> >>>>>>> lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
> >>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>>
> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com>.
currently codi uses a profile for activating it for nightly builds (see
[1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/pom.xml
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/15 Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
> This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code.
> Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of
> tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to
> commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number to be
> calculated.
>
> What do we use this for, debugging? If so, I'm wondering if we could
> only allow this to be executed with snapshots and allow everything
> else to be unknown..
>
> Scott
>
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorff <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
> > <rd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Matthias,
> >>
> >> Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
> >> apache-release?
> >
> > it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
> > from a TAG,
> > hence the revision is known.
> >
> >>
> >> It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
> >> installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
> >> projects.
> >
> > I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >>
> >> regards
> >> Rudy.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann <be...@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello Matze,
> >>>
> >>> good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
> >>> to 'unkown'.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> Bernd
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <
> matzew@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Downloaded the source:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
> >>>>
> >>>> did an unzip and "mvn clean install"
> >>>>
> >>>> I am getting this "error":
> >>>> [INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
> >>>> [INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
> >>>> [INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
> >>>> [INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
> >>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api &&
> >>>> svn --non-interactive info
> >>>> [INFO] Working directory:
> >>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
> >>>> Provider message:
> >>>> The svn command failed.
> >>>> Command output:
> >>>> svn: '.' is not a working copy
> >>>>
> >>>> [INFO]
> >>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> >>>> [INFO]
> >>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> [INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
> >>>> Error!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> This is due to the "buildnumber-maven-plugin", not sure if that should
> >>>> be really _always_ enabled...
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
> >>>> folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
> >>>> not "SVN folder".
> >>>>
> >>>> Any hints?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> >>>>>> [ ] +0
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> >>>>>> released,
> >>>>>> and why..............
> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Scott
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
> >>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or
> not.
> >>>>>>> This
> >>>>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all
> >>>>>>> of the
> >>>>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
> >>>>>>> testing.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for
> review.
> >>>>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
> >>>>>>> JIRA
> >>>>>>> site [2] for review as well.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Scott O'Bryan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to
> NEXUS,
> >>>>>>> so a
> >>>>>>> lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
> >>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>>
> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code.
Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of
tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to
commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number to be
calculated.
What do we use this for, debugging? If so, I'm wondering if we could
only allow this to be executed with snapshots and allow everything
else to be unknown..
Scott
On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorff <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
> <rd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias,
>>
>> Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
>> apache-release?
>
> it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
> from a TAG,
> hence the revision is known.
>
>>
>> It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
>> installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
>> projects.
>
> I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
>
> -Matthias
>
>>
>> regards
>> Rudy.
>>
>>
>> On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann <be...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Matze,
>>>
>>> good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
>>> to 'unkown'.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Bernd
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Downloaded the source:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
>>>>
>>>> did an unzip and "mvn clean install"
>>>>
>>>> I am getting this "error":
>>>> [INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
>>>> [INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
>>>> [INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
>>>> [INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
>>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api &&
>>>> svn --non-interactive info
>>>> [INFO] Working directory:
>>>> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
>>>> Provider message:
>>>> The svn command failed.
>>>> Command output:
>>>> svn: '.' is not a working copy
>>>>
>>>> [INFO]
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
>>>> [INFO]
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
>>>> Error!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is due to the "buildnumber-maven-plugin", not sure if that should
>>>> be really _always_ enabled...
>>>>
>>>> Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
>>>> folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
>>>> not "SVN folder".
>>>>
>>>> Any hints?
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>>>> released,
>>>>>> and why..............
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all
>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
>>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
>>>>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>> site [2] for review as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
>>>>>>> so a
>>>>>>> lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
<rd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Matthias,
>
> Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
> apache-release?
it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
from a TAG,
hence the revision is known.
>
> It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
> installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
> projects.
I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
-Matthias
>
> regards
> Rudy.
>
>
> On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann <be...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Matze,
>>
>> good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
>> to 'unkown'.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Downloaded the source:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
>> >
>> > did an unzip and "mvn clean install"
>> >
>> > I am getting this "error":
>> > [INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
>> > [INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
>> > [INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
>> > [INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
>> > /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api &&
>> > svn --non-interactive info
>> > [INFO] Working directory:
>> > /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
>> > Provider message:
>> > The svn command failed.
>> > Command output:
>> > svn: '.' is not a working copy
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
>> > [INFO]
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > [INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
>> > Error!
>> >
>> >
>> > This is due to the "buildnumber-maven-plugin", not sure if that should
>> > be really _always_ enabled...
>> >
>> > Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
>> > folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
>> > not "SVN folder".
>> >
>> > Any hints?
>> >
>> > -Matthias
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>> >>>
>> >>> ------------------------------------------------
>> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> >>> [ ] +0
>> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>> >>> released,
>> >>> and why..............
>> >>> ------------------------------------------------
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Scott
>> >>>
>> >>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hey all,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
>> >>>> release
>> >>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
>> >>>> This
>> >>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all
>> >>>> of the
>> >>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
>> >>>> testing.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
>> >>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
>> >>>> JIRA
>> >>>> site [2] for review as well.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Scott O'Bryan
>> >>>>
>> >>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
>> >>>> so a
>> >>>> lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [1]
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>> >>>> [2]
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>> >>>>
>> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Rudy De Busscher <rd...@gmail.com>.
Matthias,
Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
apache-release?
It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
projects.
regards
Rudy.
On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann <be...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Hello Matze,
>
> good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
> to 'unkown'.
>
> Regards
>
> Bernd
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Downloaded the source:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
> >
> > did an unzip and "mvn clean install"
> >
> > I am getting this "error":
> > [INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
> > [INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
> > [INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
> > [INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
> > /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api &&
> > svn --non-interactive info
> > [INFO] Working directory:
> > /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
> > Provider message:
> > The svn command failed.
> > Command output:
> > svn: '.' is not a working copy
> >
> > [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> > [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
> > Error!
> >
> >
> > This is due to the "buildnumber-maven-plugin", not sure if that should
> > be really _always_ enabled...
> >
> > Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
> > folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
> > not "SVN folder".
> >
> > Any hints?
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> >>> [ ] +0
> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> >>> and why..............
> >>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Scott
> >>>
> >>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
> release
> >>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
> This
> >>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of
> the
> >>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
> >>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
> JIRA
> >>>> site [2] for review as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Scott O'Bryan
> >>>>
> >>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
> so a
> >>>> lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
> >>>> [2]
> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
> >>>> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@googlemail.com>.
Hello Matze,
good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
to 'unkown'.
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Downloaded the source:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
>
> did an unzip and "mvn clean install"
>
> I am getting this "error":
> [INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
> [INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
> [INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
> [INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api &&
> svn --non-interactive info
> [INFO] Working directory:
> /home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
> Provider message:
> The svn command failed.
> Command output:
> svn: '.' is not a working copy
>
> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
> Error!
>
>
> This is due to the "buildnumber-maven-plugin", not sure if that should
> be really _always_ enabled...
>
> Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
> folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
> not "SVN folder".
>
> Any hints?
>
> -Matthias
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>
>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>> and why..............
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey all,
>>>>
>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release
>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This
>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the
>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
>>>>
>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA
>>>> site [2] for review as well.
>>>>
>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>>
>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a
>>>> lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Downloaded the source:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
did an unzip and "mvn clean install"
I am getting this "error":
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api &&
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working directory:
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
Provider message:
The svn command failed.
Command output:
svn: '.' is not a working copy
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Error!
This is due to the "buildnumber-maven-plugin", not sure if that should
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not "SVN folder".
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>
>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>> and why..............
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott
>>
>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release
>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This
>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the
>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
>>>
>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA
>>> site [2] for review as well.
>>>
>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>
>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a
>>> lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>>> [2]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Blake Sullivan
<bl...@oracle.com> wrote:
> It built fine for me on my Mac.
I know why I bought one :-)
> But +0 until we find out what is up with
> Matthias' build.
>
> -- Blake
>
> On 2/15/11 9:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> I am voting -1 because I am not able to build the source release.
>> The source release is the most important part of an apache release
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, MAX STARETS<ma...@oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>>>> and why..............
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
>>>>>> This
>>>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
>>>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>> site [2] for review as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
>>>>>> so
>>>>>> a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Blake Sullivan <bl...@oracle.com>.
It built fine for me on my Mac. But +0 until we find out what is up with
Matthias' build.
-- Blake
On 2/15/11 9:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> -1
>
> I am voting -1 because I am not able to build the source release.
> The source release is the most important part of an apache release
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, MAX STARETS<ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>>> and why..............
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release
>>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This
>>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the
>>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
>>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA
>>>>> site [2] for review as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>>>
>>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so
>>>>> a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Okay cool. Stopping the vote.
I'll get a patch right in for this and regenerate the artifacts. Expect
a vote today or tomorrow. Basically, I'm going to follow Gerhard's
suggestion and add a profile which is disabled by default which would
allow us to enable this functionality for nightly builds where it's
important.
Sound Good?
Scott
On 02/15/2011 10:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> -1
>
> I am voting -1 because I am not able to build the source release.
> The source release is the most important part of an apache release
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, MAX STARETS<ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>>> and why..............
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release
>>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This
>>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the
>>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
>>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA
>>>>> site [2] for review as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>>>
>>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so
>>>>> a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
-1
I am voting -1 because I am not able to build the source release.
The source release is the most important part of an apache release
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, MAX STARETS <ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>
>>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>> and why..............
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey all,
>>>>
>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release
>>>> out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This
>>>> is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the
>>>> unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
>>>>
>>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
>>>> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA
>>>> site [2] for review as well.
>>>>
>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>>
>>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so
>>>> a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>>>
>>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by MAX STARETS <ma...@oracle.com>.
+1
On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> +1
>
> On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>> and why..............
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott
>>
>> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
>>> release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks
>>> good or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few
>>> open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has
>>> undergone some considerable testing.
>>>
>>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for
>>> review. The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are
>>> on the JIRA site [2] for review as well.
>>>
>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>
>>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
>>> so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>>>
>>> [2]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
>> release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good
>> or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open
>> bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some
>> considerable testing.
>>
>> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for
>> review. The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are
>> on the JIRA site [2] for review as well.
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott O'Bryan
>>
>> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
>> so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
>> [2]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..............
------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
> release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good
> or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open
> bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some
> considerable testing.
>
> I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
> The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
> JIRA site [2] for review as well.
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott O'Bryan
>
> PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
> so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
>
> [1]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661&version=12316092>
>