You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@depot.apache.org by mm...@apache.org on 2004/07/08 18:24:38 UTC
svn commit: rev 22732 - incubator/depot/trunk/version
Author: mmay
Date: Thu Jul 8 11:24:38 2004
New Revision: 22732
Added:
incubator/depot/trunk/version/build-ant-get.xml
Modified:
incubator/depot/trunk/version/build.xml
Log:
Added: incubator/depot/trunk/version/build-ant-get.xml
==============================================================================
--- (empty file)
+++ incubator/depot/trunk/version/build-ant-get.xml Thu Jul 8 11:24:38 2004
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!--$Id: $-->
+<!--This is a autogenerated file designed to be checked in to Source Control-->
+<project default="get-all" name="">
+ <property name="depot.home" value="${user.home}/.apache.depot" />
+ <property name="repository.dir" value="${depot.home}/local-repository" />
+ <fileset id="depot-version.dependent.jars.fileset" dir="${repository.dir}">
+ <include name="servletapi/jars/servletapi-2.3.jar" />
+ </fileset>
+ <target name="get-all"
+ depends="get-servletapi"/>
+ <target name="get-servletapi">
+ <mkdir dir="${repository.dir}/servletapi/jars/" />
+ <get verbose="true"
+ usetimestamp="true"
+ dest="${repository.dir}/servletapi/jars/servletapi-2.3.jar"
+ src="http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/servletapi/jars/servletapi-2.3.jar" />
+ </target>
+</project>
Modified: incubator/depot/trunk/version/build.xml
==============================================================================
--- incubator/depot/trunk/version/build.xml (original)
+++ incubator/depot/trunk/version/build.xml Thu Jul 8 11:24:38 2004
@@ -64,12 +64,20 @@
<importer name="forrest_0_6-0.1" href="${antlets.repo}" />
<importer name="apache-0.1" href="${antlets.repo}" />
+ <fileset id="depot-version.dependent.jars.fileset" dir=".">
+ <include name="lib/*.jar" />
+ </fileset>
+ <import file="build-ant-get.xml" />
+
<path id="depot-version.classpath">
+ <fileset refid="depot-version.dependent.jars.fileset" />
<fileset dir=".">
<include name="lib/*.jar" />
</fileset>
<pathelement path="../common/build/depot-common/classes"/>
</path>
+
+ <import file="build-ant-get.xml"/>
<!-- note this must be after the java antlet-->
<selector id="conditional.compile">
Re: ArtifactType
Posted by "Adam R. B. Jack" <aj...@trysybase.com>.
Usage usage usage. We need to start using this stuff (so we get incented to
wire in the MD5 stuff, and so forth).
regards
Adam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus M. May" <mm...@gmx.net>
To: "Depot Development" <de...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: ArtifactType
> Hmm, well.
> what do you think should be our next steps? I am not a big writer, so i am
> not really a big fan of writing documentation :-)
> also the security stuff is nice, but i guess that there are other issues
> scratching right now, right?
>
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > since my project at work is pretty much live now, i hope that i can
> > > spend more time now on depot.
> > > right now i have a question concerning the artifactType. There are
some
> > > :TODO: tags in this. What was the main intend for this class? Should
we
> > > change this?
> >
> > Depot has a concept of namespaces (QName stolen from the WS folks) which
> > basically allows a name within a URI, identified by a prefix. This is
used
> > in a bunch of places when a name alone isn't unique. For example say we
> > wants the 'depot jars' or the 'depot source' we'd want to have
jars:depot
> > or
> > source:depot both with the name 'depot'.
> >
> > The main intention of this class is to define a few types (as
namespaces),
> > for jar or docs or source or ... (hence the todos). Right now we are
> > trying
> > to get off the ground with jars.
> >
> > I'd leave the TODOs but I'd not worry about it too much.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Adam
> >
>
Re: ArtifactType
Posted by "Markus M. May" <mm...@gmx.net>.
Hmm, well.
what do you think should be our next steps? I am not a big writer, so i am
not really a big fan of writing documentation :-)
also the security stuff is nice, but i guess that there are other issues
scratching right now, right?
>
> > Hello,
> > since my project at work is pretty much live now, i hope that i can
> > spend more time now on depot.
> > right now i have a question concerning the artifactType. There are some
> > :TODO: tags in this. What was the main intend for this class? Should we
> > change this?
>
> Depot has a concept of namespaces (QName stolen from the WS folks) which
> basically allows a name within a URI, identified by a prefix. This is used
> in a bunch of places when a name alone isn't unique. For example say we
> wants the 'depot jars' or the 'depot source' we'd want to have jars:depot
> or
> source:depot both with the name 'depot'.
>
> The main intention of this class is to define a few types (as namespaces),
> for jar or docs or source or ... (hence the todos). Right now we are
> trying
> to get off the ground with jars.
>
> I'd leave the TODOs but I'd not worry about it too much.
>
> regards
>
> Adam
>
Re: ArtifactType
Posted by "Adam R. B. Jack" <aj...@apache.org>.
> Hello,
> since my project at work is pretty much live now, i hope that i can
> spend more time now on depot.
> right now i have a question concerning the artifactType. There are some
> :TODO: tags in this. What was the main intend for this class? Should we
> change this?
Depot has a concept of namespaces (QName stolen from the WS folks) which
basically allows a name within a URI, identified by a prefix. This is used
in a bunch of places when a name alone isn't unique. For example say we
wants the 'depot jars' or the 'depot source' we'd want to have jars:depot or
source:depot both with the name 'depot'.
The main intention of this class is to define a few types (as namespaces),
for jar or docs or source or ... (hence the todos). Right now we are trying
to get off the ground with jars.
I'd leave the TODOs but I'd not worry about it too much.
regards
Adam
Re: ArtifactType
Posted by "Adam R. B. Jack" <aj...@apache.org>.
I can focus again from Monday onwards. Busy 'til then. Please dig around and
let's get all these questions out/answered & behind us.
regards
Adam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus M. May" <mm...@gmx.net>
To: <de...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:17 PM
Subject: ArtifactType
> Hello,
> since my project at work is pretty much live now, i hope that i can
> spend more time now on depot.
> right now i have a question concerning the artifactType. There are some
> :TODO: tags in this. What was the main intend for this class? Should we
> change this?
>
> Markus
>
ArtifactType
Posted by "Markus M. May" <mm...@gmx.net>.
Hello,
since my project at work is pretty much live now, i hope that i can
spend more time now on depot.
right now i have a question concerning the artifactType. There are some
:TODO: tags in this. What was the main intend for this class? Should we
change this?
Markus