Re: Supressing generation of xs:extension against inheritance

[Phil Weighill-Smith <ph...@volantis.com>]

Thanks for the suggestions. I guess I'll live with the xs:extensions for
now (I guess they don't really affect the actual XML structure, save
element ordering).

Phil :n.

On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:06 -0500, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:01 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > Honestly, looking at the jaxb spec, I don't see anything that would allow 
> > that.    Thats something you may want to ask on the jaxb lists:
> > 
> > https://jaxb.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectMailingListList
> > 
> > There might be some hidden flag or something that could be used to set 
> > it.  I don't really know.
> 
> (sort of) As per the blog posting I wrote at dssheep.blogspot.com, you
> could consider the following methodology:
> 
> 1) Use your current classes as sacrificial.
> 2) Edit the XSD until you like it.
> 3) Regenerate new classes.
> 
> The new classes will be redundant, but will that really hurt? You could
> also whip up a set of facade wrappers that delegate your interfaces to
> them.
> 
> 
>