You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Mathias Homann <ad...@eregion.de> on 2008/10/21 12:12:41 UTC

Not a reply: spamassassin stats (was Re: Tuning the bayes-system?)

Am Dienstag 21 Oktober 2008 schrieb Heinrich Christian Peters:

> Email:     3870  Autolearn:  3575  Cached:   126  AvgScore:  29.35
> Spam:      3562  Autolearn:  3411  Cached:   113  AvgScore:  32.22
> Ham:        308  Autolearn:   164  Cached:    13  AvgScore:  -3.81
>
> TOP SPAM RULES FIRED    (50/432)
> ===================================================================
>===== RANK    RULE NAME          SCORE   COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM 
> %OFHAM   BAYES
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>----- 18    BAYES_99            5.40    1970   50.90   55.31    0.00
>  100.00 27    BAYES_50            0.00     801   21.16   22.49   
> 5.84   97.80 41    BAYES_80            2.00     259    6.69    7.27
>    0.00  100.00 43    BAYES_95            3.00     248    6.41   
> 6.96    0.00  100.00
>
> TOP HAM RULES FIRED     (50/78)
> ===================================================================
>===== RANK    RULE NAME          SCORE   COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM 
> %OFHAM   BAYES
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>
>    2    BAYES_00           -4.90     253    8.01    1.60   82.14  
> 81.61 12    BAYES_50            0.00      18   21.16   22.49   
> 5.84    2.20 21    BAYES_40           -0.18       8    0.93    0.79
>    2.60   22.22 32    BAYES_05           -1.11       4    0.62   
> 0.56    1.30   16.67 43    BAYES_20           -0.74       3    0.65
>    0.62    0.97   12.00
>
> conf:
> bayes_expiry_max_db_size 1500000
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7.5

What are you using to generate those stats?
I'd like to have that on my server as well.


bye,
MH


-- 
gpg key fingerprint: 5F64 4C92 9B77 DE37 D184  C5F9 B013 44E7 27BD 
763C

Re: Not a reply: spamassassin stats (was Re: Tuning the bayes-system?)

Posted by Heinrich Christian Peters <He...@nurfuerspam.de>.
Moin,

Koopmann, Jan-Peter schrieb:
> can you share your new script with the MailScanner changes with us?

of cause I can... But the script will only work with German reports [1],
 you have change it. I am no perl-guru, so changes are welcome!

You can find the script here:
<http://www.heinrich-peters.de/mailscanner/sa-stats_MailScanner.txt>


[1]:
> X-heinrich-peters.zz-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam,
> 	SpamAssassin (nicht zwischen gespeichert, Wertung=-5.563,
> 	benoetigt 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL -0.66, BAYES_00 -4.90,
> 	NO_RELAYS -0.00)


RE: Re: Not a reply: spamassassin stats (was Re: Tuning the bayes-system?)

Posted by "Koopmann, Jan-Peter" <ja...@koopmann.eu>.
Hi,

can you share your new script with the MailScanner changes with us?

Kind regards,
  JP


Re: Not a reply: spamassassin stats (was Re: Tuning the bayes-system?)

Posted by Heinrich Christian Peters <He...@nurfuerspam.de>.
Hello Mathias,

I am useing a variant of the sa-stats script:
<http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt>

I had to change some things to get it work with my MailScanner-setup.

Bye,
Heiner

Mathias Homann schrieb:
> Am Dienstag 21 Oktober 2008 schrieb Heinrich Christian Peters:
> 
>>  [... my SpamAssassin Statistics ...]
> 
> What are you using to generate those stats?
> I'd like to have that on my server as well.
> 
> 
> bye,
> MH
> 
>