You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-commits@lucene.apache.org by Apache Wiki <wi...@apache.org> on 2010/10/15 09:08:53 UTC

[Solr Wiki] Trivial Update of "DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport" by ChartonSapinoso

Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Solr Wiki" for change notification.

The "DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport" page has been changed by ChartonSapinoso.
The comment on this change is: query string parameter shows "clear" instead of "clean". I copied the URL and my solr instance did a full clean reindex instead of just delta. .
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport?action=diff&rev1=2&rev2=3

--------------------------------------------------

  = Using query attribute for both full and delta import =
- 
  The standard approach in Solr is to define one query for the initial import and a second query to fetch the IDs of documents that have changed and a third query to fetch the data that changed. Especially if you expect a large number of changes this isn't very efficient. Furthermore if both in the initial import and the delta case you have the same SELECT list, its tedious to maintain 3 queries where two are almost identical and one still very similar. The fundamental idea is to only define one query for both the full and delta import by reading out the requests parameters on a full-import.
  
  == Example ==
+ So take the example from the docs:
  
- So take the example from the docs:
  {{{
  <entity name="item" pk="ID"
    query="SELECT * FROM item"
@@ -15, +14 @@

    deltaQuery="SELECT id FROM item
      WHERE last_modified > '${dataimporter.last_index_time}'">
  }}}
+ This can be rewritten as follows:
  
- This can be rewritten as follows:
  {{{
  <entity name="item" pk="ID"
    query="SELECT * FROM item
      WHERE '${dataimporter.request.clean}' != 'false'
        OR last_modified > '${dataimporter.last_index_time}'">
  }}}
+ When doing a normal full import solr defaults the {{{clean}}} to {{{true}}} (watch out you can override this default in the solrconfig.xml so you might want to always set it explicitly to true). As a result the first part of the WHERE condition will be {{{'true' != 'false'}}} which any decent RDBMS will figure out will lead to the entire all always evaluating to true aka reading the entire table: {{{http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/dataimport?command=full-import&clean=true}}}
  
- When doing a normal full import solr defaults the {{{clean}}} to {{{true}}} (watch out you can override this default in the solrconfig.xml so you might want to always set it explicitly to true). As a result the first part of the WHERE condition will be {{{'true' != 'false'}}} which any decent RDBMS will figure out will lead to the entire all always evaluating to true aka reading the entire table:
- {{{http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/dataimport?command=full-import&clear=true}}}
- 
- Now when doing a delta import you do not use the delta import, but instead you do a normal full-import but with the {{{clear}}} GET parameter set to {{{false}}}:
+ Now when doing a delta import you do not use the delta import, but instead you do a normal full-import but with the {{{clear}}} GET parameter set to {{{false}}}: {{{http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/dataimport?command=full-import&clean=false}}}
- {{{http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/dataimport?command=full-import&clear=false}}}
  
  In this case the first part of the WHERE will be {{{'false' != 'false'}}} which is obviously always false and any RDBMS should optimize that away and just evaluate the second condition.
  
  In this case it means obviously that in case you also want to use {{{deletedPkQuery}}} then when running the {{{delta-import}}} command is still necessary.
  
  == Efficiency Aspect ==
- 
  There might be situations where separate queries might be more efficient. Consider an example where the query that fetches the document data is a very complex join and the RDBMS doesn't do a great job with coming up with a good query plan and you can determine a relatively small number of ID's that change every night with a SELECT without a JOIN, then it might be more efficient to do one query to fetch the ID's and then one query per fetched ID that does the complex join.