You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by gatorsmile <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/11/24 20:09:22 UTC

[GitHub] spark pull request #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131

    [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

    ## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
    This PR is to add back `unionAll`, which is widely used. The name is also consistent with our ANSI SQL. We also have the corresponding `IntersectAll` and `exceptAll`, which were introduced in Spark 2.4.
    
    ## How was this patch tested?
    Added a test case in DataFrameSuite

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/gatorsmile/spark addBackUnionAll

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #23131
    
----
commit 133246d973eb516ebc12ba5bb49cd30ba4f108f9
Author: gatorsmile <ga...@...>
Date:   2018-11-24T20:04:52Z

    Add back unionAll

----


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99230 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99230/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`f0dfe7b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f0dfe7ba56daee34a37ba727ac76e29325b7e995).


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99242 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99242/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`515c04c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/515c04c8833bd5b5683c7040e7d46d0b026255e6).
     * This patch passes all tests.
     * This patch merges cleanly.
     * This patch adds no public classes.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by cloud-fan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    shall we say `union` is an alias of `unionAll` instead of `unionAll` is an alias of `Union`? According to the SQL spec, `unionAll` is implemented correctly that it keeps duplicated rows, while `union` does not follow SQL spec, as it's too widely used and it's too late to change behavior.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test PASSed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5323/
    Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark pull request #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by rxin <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131#discussion_r236052557
  
    --- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
    @@ -1852,6 +1852,19 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
         CombineUnions(Union(logicalPlan, other.logicalPlan))
       }
     
    +  /**
    +   * Returns a new Dataset containing union of rows in this Dataset and another Dataset.
    --- End diff --
    
    say that this is an alias of union.



---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99228 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99228/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`133246d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/133246d973eb516ebc12ba5bb49cd30ba4f108f9).
     * This patch passes all tests.
     * This patch merges cleanly.
     * This patch adds no public classes.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test FAILed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99234/
    Test FAILed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99234 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99234/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`515c04c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/515c04c8833bd5b5683c7040e7d46d0b026255e6).


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark pull request #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by dongjoon-hyun <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131#discussion_r236057105
  
    --- Diff: docs/sql-migration-guide-upgrade.md ---
    @@ -341,8 +341,6 @@ displayTitle: Spark SQL Upgrading Guide
        APIs. Instead, `DataFrame` remains the primary programming abstraction, which is analogous to the
        single-node data frame notion in these languages.
     
    - - Dataset and DataFrame API `unionAll` has been deprecated and replaced by `union`
    --- End diff --
    
    Ur, we cannot change the history. Until Spark 2.4.0, we are showing the deprecation warning.
    ```scala
    scala> spark.version
    res2: String = 2.4.0
    
    scala> df.unionAll(df2)
    <console>:28: warning: method unionAll in class Dataset is deprecated: use union()
           df.unionAll(df2)
              ^
    ```
    Shall we keep the history in this specific migration doc, `Upgrading From Spark SQL 1.6 to 2.0`, and add some comment it's added back in 3.0.0 instead?



---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark pull request #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by felixcheung <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131#discussion_r236760822
  
    --- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
    @@ -2732,6 +2732,20 @@ setMethod("union",
                 dataFrame(unioned)
               })
     
    +#' Return a new SparkDataFrame containing the union of rows
    +#'
    +#' This is an alias for `union`.
    --- End diff --
    
    If the goal is for this to be like other *All, this should go into a separate doc page, plus seealso, example etc.
    
    The way this was written, as it was a deprecated function, this doc page merge with union - as it is, none of the text above will show up and also unionAll will not be listed in method index list.



---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99229 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99229/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`12dfd77`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/12dfd77c665f38b450e4dc3e48a32bf651a3179e).
     * This patch **fails some tests**.
     * This patch merges cleanly.
     * This patch adds no public classes.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test PASSed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99228/
    Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark pull request #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by gatorsmile <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131#discussion_r236803943
  
    --- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
    @@ -2732,6 +2732,20 @@ setMethod("union",
                 dataFrame(unioned)
               })
     
    +#' Return a new SparkDataFrame containing the union of rows
    +#'
    +#' This is an alias for `union`.
    --- End diff --
    
    I see. Instead of directly copying the comments back, we should follow intersectAll. Opened a ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26189


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99234 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99234/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`515c04c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/515c04c8833bd5b5683c7040e7d46d0b026255e6).
     * This patch **fails due to an unknown error code, -9**.
     * This patch merges cleanly.
     * This patch adds no public classes.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test PASSed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5330/
    Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by gatorsmile <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    retest this please


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by gatorsmile <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Thanks! Merged to master. 
    
    Yes. Adding Distinct over Union is super expensive especially when the underlying data set is huge. 


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark pull request #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by felixcheung <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131#discussion_r236763355
  
    --- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
    @@ -2732,6 +2732,20 @@ setMethod("union",
                 dataFrame(unioned)
               })
     
    +#' Return a new SparkDataFrame containing the union of rows
    +#'
    +#' This is an alias for `union`.
    --- End diff --
    
    also backtick doesn't format with roxygen2. this should be 
    ```
    This is an alias for \code{union}.
    ```


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99231 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99231/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`170262b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/170262b9c16c2b8901b1ec65e7c98a25a7eef077).


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by gatorsmile <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    cc @rxin @srowen @cloud-fan 


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test PASSed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5318/
    Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark pull request #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by srowen <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131#discussion_r236057261
  
    --- Diff: docs/sql-migration-guide-upgrade.md ---
    @@ -341,8 +341,6 @@ displayTitle: Spark SQL Upgrading Guide
        APIs. Instead, `DataFrame` remains the primary programming abstraction, which is analogous to the
        single-node data frame notion in these languages.
     
    - - Dataset and DataFrame API `unionAll` has been deprecated and replaced by `union`
    --- End diff --
    
    That's my fault for making this suggestion. Yeah maybe best to leave this statement, and add a note here or the the 3.0 migration guide that it has been subsequently un-deprecated


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99231 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99231/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`170262b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/170262b9c16c2b8901b1ec65e7c98a25a7eef077).
     * This patch passes all tests.
     * This patch merges cleanly.
     * This patch adds no public classes.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99242 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99242/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`515c04c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/515c04c8833bd5b5683c7040e7d46d0b026255e6).


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark pull request #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark pull request #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by gatorsmile <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131#discussion_r236054278
  
    --- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
    @@ -1852,6 +1852,19 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
         CombineUnions(Union(logicalPlan, other.logicalPlan))
       }
     
    +  /**
    +   * Returns a new Dataset containing union of rows in this Dataset and another Dataset.
    --- End diff --
    
    Done.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test PASSed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99231/
    Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99229 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99229/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`12dfd77`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/12dfd77c665f38b450e4dc3e48a32bf651a3179e).


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99228 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99228/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`133246d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/133246d973eb516ebc12ba5bb49cd30ba4f108f9).


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test FAILed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99230/
    Test FAILed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test FAILed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99229/
    Test FAILed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by SparkQA <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    **[Test build #99230 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99230/testReport)** for PR 23131 at commit [`f0dfe7b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f0dfe7ba56daee34a37ba727ac76e29325b7e995).
     * This patch **fails some tests**.
     * This patch merges cleanly.
     * This patch adds no public classes.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test PASSed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5320/
    Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test PASSed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99242/
    Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Test PASSed.
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5319/
    Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] spark issue #23131: [SPARK-25908][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add back unionAll

Posted by AmplabJenkins <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23131
  
    Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org