You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@karaf.apache.org by jochenw <jo...@googlemail.com> on 2015/06/30 08:22:36 UTC
Karaf Service Wrapper License Issue
Hello,
as far as I can see from Karaf 3.0.3, it still uses the Service Wrapper now
maintained by Tanuki, in a version where it is still complying with the
Karaf license model.
However, this version has some shortcomings: it does not work on ARM based
systems, and (but I haven't tried this yet) it seems to be limited to 4 GB
heap size.
Are there plans to shift to another service wrapping technique in one of the
next Karaf releases (I saw some discussion about the commons daemon), or
would I have to license the current version of the service wrapper and
exchange the respective libraries for a commercial project?
Is there any experience with usage of an alternative service wrapper for
Karaf?
Best Regards,
Jochen
--
View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-Service-Wrapper-License-Issue-tp4041189.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Karaf Service Wrapper License Issue
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Jochen,
On one of my branch, I have the replacement of JSW by commons-daemon.
It doesn't bring exactly the same features but very close.
Regards
JB
On 06/30/2015 08:22 AM, jochenw wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as far as I can see from Karaf 3.0.3, it still uses the Service Wrapper now
> maintained by Tanuki, in a version where it is still complying with the
> Karaf license model.
>
> However, this version has some shortcomings: it does not work on ARM based
> systems, and (but I haven't tried this yet) it seems to be limited to 4 GB
> heap size.
>
> Are there plans to shift to another service wrapping technique in one of the
> next Karaf releases (I saw some discussion about the commons daemon), or
> would I have to license the current version of the service wrapper and
> exchange the respective libraries for a commercial project?
>
> Is there any experience with usage of an alternative service wrapper for
> Karaf?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Jochen
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-Service-Wrapper-License-Issue-tp4041189.html
> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com