You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Christophe Jaillet <ch...@wanadoo.fr> on 2018/06/29 19:31:39 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES
docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c
modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_config.c
Le 29/06/2018 à 13:53, icing@apache.org a écrit :
> Author: icing
> Date: Fri Jun 29 11:53:50 2018
> New Revision: 1834671
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1834671&view=rev
> Log:
> On the 2.4.x branch:
>
> backport of current mod_md version and documentation.
>
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_crypt.c
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_json.c
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_version.h
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md.c
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md_config.c
>
Hi,
according to 2.4.x/STATUS, mod_md is not CTR.
Maybe, STATUS should be updated to add an exception for mod_md? (or
maybe even for any module marked as experimental?)
Otherwise, this should go through STATUS first.
CJ
Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES
docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c
modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_config.c
Posted by Stefan Eissing <st...@greenbytes.de>.
> Am 03.07.2018 um 13:54 schrieb Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com>:
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 2, 2018, at 1:40 PM, Christophe Jaillet <ch...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 02/07/2018 à 17:36, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
>>>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de <ma...@greenbytes.de>> wrote:
>>>> I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
>>>> through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer. I basically thought the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
>>>> We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;
>>>> * Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
>>>> . mod_proxy_http2
>>>> . mod_lua
>>>> . documentation
>>>> . non-Unix build
>>>> . non-Unix, single-platform code
>>>
>>> I don't have a strong opinion about it, that's why I proposed to update STATUS to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe even for any module marked as experimental?)
>>>
>>
>> +1 (for CTR for both mod_md *as well as* any module marked experimental)
>
> +1
+1
Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES
docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c
modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_config.c
Posted by Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 2, 2018, at 1:40 PM, Christophe Jaillet <ch...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>>
>> Le 02/07/2018 à 17:36, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
>>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de <ma...@greenbytes.de>> wrote:
>>> I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
>>> through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer. I basically thought the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
>>> We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;
>>> * Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
>>> . mod_proxy_http2
>>> . mod_lua
>>> . documentation
>>> . non-Unix build
>>> . non-Unix, single-platform code
>>
>> I don't have a strong opinion about it, that's why I proposed to update STATUS to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe even for any module marked as experimental?)
>>
>
> +1 (for CTR for both mod_md *as well as* any module marked experimental)
+1
Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES
docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c
modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_config.c
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
> On Jul 2, 2018, at 1:40 PM, Christophe Jaillet <ch...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 02/07/2018 à 17:36, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de <ma...@greenbytes.de>> wrote:
>> I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
>> through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer. I basically thought the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
>> We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;
>> * Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
>> . mod_proxy_http2
>> . mod_lua
>> . documentation
>> . non-Unix build
>> . non-Unix, single-platform code
>
> I don't have a strong opinion about it, that's why I proposed to update STATUS to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe even for any module marked as experimental?)
>
+1 (for CTR for both mod_md *as well as* any module marked experimental)
Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES
docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c
modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_config.c
Posted by Christophe Jaillet <ch...@wanadoo.fr>.
Le 02/07/2018 à 17:36, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing
> <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de <ma...@greenbytes.de>> wrote:
>
> I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
> through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer.
>
>
> I basically thought the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
> We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;
>
> * Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
> . mod_proxy_http2
> . mod_lua
> . documentation
> . non-Unix build
> . non-Unix, single-platform code
I don't have a strong opinion about it, that's why I proposed to update
STATUS to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe even for any module
marked as experimental?)
A grep in 2.4.x, shows the following modules marked as Experimental:
mod_allowmethods.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_dialup.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_echo.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_example_hooks.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_file_cache.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_heartbeat.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_heartmonitor.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_lbmethod_heartbeat.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_log_debug.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_lua.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_privileges.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_sed.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
mod_session_crypto.xml:<status>Experimental</status>
I suspect, that some should not be marked as Experimental anymore.
mod_md and mod_proxy_http2 don't have an Experimental status, only a
red-lined warning at the beginning of its doc.
Maybe something should be added in the module list to easily spot the
one with an Experimental status and a note explaining what this mean.
(i.e., if I'm correct, the code is considered as stable, but its
implementation and/or API and/or directives are subject to change in
future release)
CJ
Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES
docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c
modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_config.c
Posted by William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de
> wrote:
> I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
> through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer.
I basically thought the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;
* Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
. mod_proxy_http2
. mod_lua
. documentation
. non-Unix build
. non-Unix, single-platform code
Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_config.c
Posted by Stefan Eissing <st...@greenbytes.de>.
I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer.
> Am 29.06.2018 um 21:31 schrieb Christophe Jaillet <ch...@wanadoo.fr>:
>
>> Le 29/06/2018 à 13:53, icing@apache.org a écrit :
>> Author: icing
>> Date: Fri Jun 29 11:53:50 2018
>> New Revision: 1834671
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1834671&view=rev
>> Log:
>> On the 2.4.x branch:
>> backport of current mod_md version and documentation.
>> Modified:
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_crypt.c
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_json.c
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_version.h
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md.c
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md_config.c
>
> Hi,
>
> according to 2.4.x/STATUS, mod_md is not CTR.
> Maybe, STATUS should be updated to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe even for any module marked as experimental?)
> Otherwise, this should go through STATUS first.
>
> CJ