You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> on 2017/03/26 17:05:09 UTC
[VOTE] Separate Avatica into its own repository
Hi all,
Hopefully you've all caught the discussion on this subject by now
(CALCITE-1717, and this thread[1]). A few of us are leaning towards
physically separating the Avatica and Calcite codebases. We think that
this will ultimately help each project grow at their own rate and give
us more flexibility without stomping on each others' toes.
This is a (lazy-consensus) VOTE to perform this separation. For the
actions that would be taken as a result of this, please see this list in
CALCITE-1717.
Finally, let's please hold off on any commits to Avatica until we get
this resolved. As Julian has pointed out, this gives us a nice
separation (on the heels of Calcite-1.12.0).
Per ASF norms, this vote will be open for at least 72hrs (2017/03/29
1700GMT). Please let us know if there are any objections or input on
this separation. Thanks!
- Josh
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b49639d926e64955cdca49aca1d2183f00812b54d2d5957499d39c9f@%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
Re: [VOTE] Separate Avatica into its own repository
Posted by Haohui Mai <ri...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:43 AM Laurent Goujon <la...@dremio.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:25 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:15 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks for running this vote, Josh.
> > >
> > > > On Mar 26, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully you've all caught the discussion on this subject by now
> > > (CALCITE-1717, and this thread[1]). A few of us are leaning towards
> > > physically separating the Avatica and Calcite codebases. We think that
> > this
> > > will ultimately help each project grow at their own rate and give us
> more
> > > flexibility without stomping on each others' toes.
> > > >
> > > > This is a (lazy-consensus) VOTE to perform this separation. For the
> > > actions that would be taken as a result of this, please see this list
> in
> > > CALCITE-1717.
> > > >
> > > > Finally, let's please hold off on any commits to Avatica until we get
> > > this resolved. As Julian has pointed out, this gives us a nice
> separation
> > > (on the heels of Calcite-1.12.0).
> > > >
> > > > Per ASF norms, this vote will be open for at least 72hrs (2017/03/29
> > > 1700GMT). Please let us know if there are any objections or input on
> this
> > > separation. Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > - Josh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b49639d926e64955cdca49aca1d218
> > 3f00812b54d2d5957499d39c9f@%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Separate Avatica into its own repository
Posted by Laurent Goujon <la...@dremio.com>.
+1
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:25 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:15 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for running this vote, Josh.
> >
> > > On Mar 26, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Hopefully you've all caught the discussion on this subject by now
> > (CALCITE-1717, and this thread[1]). A few of us are leaning towards
> > physically separating the Avatica and Calcite codebases. We think that
> this
> > will ultimately help each project grow at their own rate and give us more
> > flexibility without stomping on each others' toes.
> > >
> > > This is a (lazy-consensus) VOTE to perform this separation. For the
> > actions that would be taken as a result of this, please see this list in
> > CALCITE-1717.
> > >
> > > Finally, let's please hold off on any commits to Avatica until we get
> > this resolved. As Julian has pointed out, this gives us a nice separation
> > (on the heels of Calcite-1.12.0).
> > >
> > > Per ASF norms, this vote will be open for at least 72hrs (2017/03/29
> > 1700GMT). Please let us know if there are any objections or input on this
> > separation. Thanks!
> > >
> > > - Josh
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b49639d926e64955cdca49aca1d218
> 3f00812b54d2d5957499d39c9f@%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Separate Avatica into its own repository
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
+1
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:15 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for running this vote, Josh.
>
> > On Mar 26, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Hopefully you've all caught the discussion on this subject by now
> (CALCITE-1717, and this thread[1]). A few of us are leaning towards
> physically separating the Avatica and Calcite codebases. We think that this
> will ultimately help each project grow at their own rate and give us more
> flexibility without stomping on each others' toes.
> >
> > This is a (lazy-consensus) VOTE to perform this separation. For the
> actions that would be taken as a result of this, please see this list in
> CALCITE-1717.
> >
> > Finally, let's please hold off on any commits to Avatica until we get
> this resolved. As Julian has pointed out, this gives us a nice separation
> (on the heels of Calcite-1.12.0).
> >
> > Per ASF norms, this vote will be open for at least 72hrs (2017/03/29
> 1700GMT). Please let us know if there are any objections or input on this
> separation. Thanks!
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> >
> > [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b49639d926e64955cdca49aca1d2183f00812b54d2d5957499d39c9f@%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Separate Avatica into its own repository
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
+1
Thanks for running this vote, Josh.
> On Mar 26, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Hopefully you've all caught the discussion on this subject by now (CALCITE-1717, and this thread[1]). A few of us are leaning towards physically separating the Avatica and Calcite codebases. We think that this will ultimately help each project grow at their own rate and give us more flexibility without stomping on each others' toes.
>
> This is a (lazy-consensus) VOTE to perform this separation. For the actions that would be taken as a result of this, please see this list in CALCITE-1717.
>
> Finally, let's please hold off on any commits to Avatica until we get this resolved. As Julian has pointed out, this gives us a nice separation (on the heels of Calcite-1.12.0).
>
> Per ASF norms, this vote will be open for at least 72hrs (2017/03/29 1700GMT). Please let us know if there are any objections or input on this separation. Thanks!
>
> - Josh
>
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b49639d926e64955cdca49aca1d2183f00812b54d2d5957499d39c9f@%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E