You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Thomas Mueller <mu...@adobe.com.INVALID> on 2020/06/05 15:30:18 UTC

Intend to backport OAK-9065 to 1.8, 1.10, and 1.22

Hi,

I intend to backport the fix for OAK-9065 to the 1.8, 1.10, and 1.22 branches. The risk should be very limited.

Let me know i you have any concerns.

Regards,
Thomas

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9065

Re: Intend to backport OAK-9065 to 1.8, 1.10, and 1.22

Posted by Thomas Mueller <mu...@adobe.com.INVALID>.

Hi,

> the 1.10 branch was retired

Thanks! You are right, I won't backport to 1.10 then.

Regards,
Thomas




On 05.06.20, 17:49, "Marcel Reutegger" <mr...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:

    Hi,

    I don't have general concerns with the backport, but please note the 1.10 branch was retired on April 6th. See also https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/roadmap.html
    We shouldn't do any backports to that branch anymore.

    Regards
     Marcel

    On 05.06.20, 17:30, "Thomas Mueller" <mu...@adobe.com> wrote:


    Hi,

    I intend to backport the fix for OAK-9065 to the 1.8, 1.10, and 1.22 branches. The risk should be very limited.

    Let me know i you have any concerns.

    Regards,
    Thomas

    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9065

Re: Intend to backport OAK-9065 to 1.8, 1.10, and 1.22

Posted by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com.INVALID>.

Hi,

I don't have general concerns with the backport, but please note the 1.10 branch was retired on April 6th. See also https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/roadmap.html
We shouldn't do any backports to that branch anymore.

Regards
 Marcel

On 05.06.20, 17:30, "Thomas Mueller" <mu...@adobe.com> wrote:


Hi,

I intend to backport the fix for OAK-9065 to the 1.8, 1.10, and 1.22 branches. The risk should be very limited.

Let me know i you have any concerns.

Regards,
Thomas

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9065