You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com> on 2008/10/22 08:44:56 UTC
[VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 0)
I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Friday,
October 24.***
http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
Nigel
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
The vote passes. I'll publish the release (takes about 24 hours).
I'll announce when ready.
Nigel
On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>
> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Friday,
> October 24.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-0/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> Nigel
Re: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 0)
Posted by Chris K Wensel <ch...@wensel.net>.
I see my mistake. (letting Tom go to bed before I could get the tests
to finish, heh)
They can go in to 0.19.1, of course.
Until then the Serialization stuff is rendered useless, but it seems
I'm practically the only one using it anyway..
thanks for the reply.
ckw
On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> Chris, you filed them but didn't mark them blockers for 0.19.0.
>
> Seems like these can these go into 0.19.1. Agreed?
>
> Nige
>
> On Oct 22, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Chris K Wensel wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> Unable to load custom Serialization implementations. Patch available
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4467
>>
>> Unable to use non-WritableComprable keys and non-Writable values
>> when writing to SequenceFiles. Patch available.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4466
>>
>> Both these prevent the next version of Cascading from being released.
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>>
>>> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>>>
>>> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Friday,
>>> October 24.***
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-0/
>>>
>>> Should we release this?
>>>
>>> Nigel
>>
>> --
>> Chris K Wensel
>> chris@wensel.net
>> http://chris.wensel.net/
>> http://www.cascading.org/
>>
>
--
Chris K Wensel
chris@wensel.net
http://chris.wensel.net/
http://www.cascading.org/
Re: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 0)
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Chris, you filed them but didn't mark them blockers for 0.19.0.
Seems like these can these go into 0.19.1. Agreed?
Nige
On Oct 22, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Chris K Wensel wrote:
> -1
>
> Unable to load custom Serialization implementations. Patch available
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4467
>
> Unable to use non-WritableComprable keys and non-Writable values
> when writing to SequenceFiles. Patch available.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4466
>
> Both these prevent the next version of Cascading from being released.
>
> On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
>> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>>
>> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Friday,
>> October 24.***
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-0/
>>
>> Should we release this?
>>
>> Nigel
>
> --
> Chris K Wensel
> chris@wensel.net
> http://chris.wensel.net/
> http://www.cascading.org/
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 0)
Posted by Chris K Wensel <ch...@wensel.net>.
-1
Unable to load custom Serialization implementations. Patch available
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4467
Unable to use non-WritableComprable keys and non-Writable values when
writing to SequenceFiles. Patch available.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4466
Both these prevent the next version of Cascading from being released.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>
> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Friday,
> October 24.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-0/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> Nigel
--
Chris K Wensel
chris@wensel.net
http://chris.wensel.net/
http://www.cascading.org/
Re: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. I was working with Tom on a unit test failure
> he discovered which I have filed as HADOOP-4698 and created a
> patch. I'm going to give my +1 to release this and fix HADOOP-4698
> in 0.19.1.
+1. I checked the signatures and the md5. I ran a simple distributed
word count.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Sorry for the delay. I was working with Tom on a unit test failure he
discovered which I have filed as HADOOP-4698 and created a patch. I'm
going to give my +1 to release this and fix HADOOP-4698 in 0.19.1.
+1 from me for 0.19.0 RC1.
Tom, others? I need at least 1 more PMC vote.
Thanks,
Nige
On Nov 20, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) wrote:
> The vote closed two days ago. How come no one other than myself
> has voted?
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation)
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:ndaley@yahoo-inc.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:23 PM
>> To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
>>
>> I've created a 2nd candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>>
>> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
>> November 18.***
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-1/
>>
>> Should we release this?
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
Posted by "Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)" <Ji...@microsoft.com>.
The vote closed two days ago. How come no one other than myself
has voted?
---
Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:ndaley@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:23 PM
> To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
>
> I've created a 2nd candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>
> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
> November 18.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> Nigel
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
On Nov 14, 2008, at 6:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> Nigel Daley wrote:
>> I've created a 2nd candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
>> November 18.***
>> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-1/
>> Should we release this?
>> Nigel
>
> I've just re-opened defect HADOOP-3844, and would propose that patch
> gets rolled back or a replacement I'm about to write goes in
> instead. rollback is easiest.
Looks like this is now https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
HADOOP-4659. Can it be fixed in 0.19.1?
Nige
Re: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
Nigel Daley wrote:
> I've created a 2nd candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>
> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
> November 18.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> Nigel
>
I've just re-opened defect HADOOP-3844, and would propose that patch
gets rolled back or a replacement I'm about to write goes in instead.
rollback is easiest.
RE: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
Posted by "Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)" <Ji...@microsoft.com>.
+1 based on running HBase tests
---
Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:ndaley@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:23 PM
> To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
>
> I've created a 2nd candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>
> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
> November 18.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> Nigel
>
[VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 1)
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
I've created a 2nd candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
November 18.***
http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-1/
Should we release this?
Nigel
Re: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.0 (candidate 0)
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
-1. I think we need to fix at least HADOOP-4517 and I think I'll roll
a 0.18.2 first.
Nige
On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.0.
>
> ***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Friday,
> October 24.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.19.0-candidate-0/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> Nigel