You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by "Srikanth Sundarrajan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/09/16 18:32:56 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1537) Suspending a sub-workflow is not reflected in the parent workflow

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13768468#comment-13768468 ] 

Srikanth Sundarrajan commented on OOZIE-1537:
---------------------------------------------

Notes from my discussion with [~tucu00] offline:

We could introduce the SUSPEND status for WF Actions and the ActionExecutor would have a method indicating if it is supported or not (except for sub-WF no other action would support that).

When a sub-WF is suspended, the parent WF action should be set to suspended and the parent WF job should be suspended. Resume should work in similar way. If the parent is suspended, the actions should be suspended if they support it. This should work up/down to/from coord jobs as well.

We need to figure out how to zigzag when a sub-wf within a fork of 2 or more sub-wf is suspended/resumed.
                
> Suspending a sub-workflow is not reflected in the parent workflow
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-1537
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1537
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Srikanth Sundarrajan
>
> Suspending a sub-workflow is not reflected in the parent workflow, thus you don't know what is going on. The status of the sub-flow should be reflected in the parent workflow just as in any other action.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira