You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@iotdb.apache.org by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com> on 2020/09/13 03:03:30 UTC
Re: [jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-892) Replace fastjson with Gson
Hi,
> If you do not mind updating the version of fastjson, ignore this issue
anyhow...
it does not depend on my favor, but which is more suitable..
I just googled some reports and yes many reports say "fastjson devotes to
the speed but sacrifices many checks"...
So how about Jackson? Sounds it is faster than Gson and stable enough [1]
[2] (two Chinese blogs)?
[1] https://segmentfault.com/a/1190000020504347
[2] https://www.xncoding.com/2018/01/09/java/jsons.html
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
yuqi (Jira) <ji...@apache.org> 于2020年9月13日周日 上午10:57写道：
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17194919#comment-17194919
> ]
>
> yuqi commented on IOTDB-892:
> ----------------------------
>
> > I know this year there is a hot bug in fastjson as it may deserialize
> some harmful beans
>
> I do think this reason is enough to abandon fastjosn if 's buggy and need
> to be frequently updated.
> stable and reliable is more than the so called 'fast', that is why
> fastjson is rarely used in the apache soft word
>
> If you do not mind updating the version of fastjson, ignore this issue
> anyhow...
>
> > Replace fastjson with Gson
> > --------------------------
> >
> > Key: IOTDB-892
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-892
> > Project: Apache IoTDB
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Reporter: yuqi
> > Priority: Critical
> > Labels: pull-request-available
> >
> > As fas as we know, fastjson is not stable and unreliable, So, we should
> remove fast json dependency
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> (v8.3.4#803005)
>
Re: [jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-892) Replace fastjson with Gson
Posted by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com>.
> the initial aim of this issue is
> to remove fastjson dependency and we will not pay to much time on the bug
> track of fastjson latter.
yes, agree.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Qi Yu <yu...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月13日周日 上午11:14写道：
> Both jackson and gson is to OK i think, the initial aim of this issue is
> to remove fastjson dependency and we will not pay to much time on the bug
> track of fastjson latter.
>
>
>
> Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月13日周日 上午11:03写道：
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > If you do not mind updating the version of fastjson, ignore this issue
> > anyhow...
> >
> > it does not depend on my favor, but which is more suitable..
> >
> > I just googled some reports and yes many reports say "fastjson devotes to
> > the speed but sacrifices many checks"...
> >
> > So how about Jackson? Sounds it is faster than Gson and stable enough [1]
> > [2] (two Chinese blogs)?
> >
> > [1] https://segmentfault.com/a/1190000020504347
> > [2] https://www.xncoding.com/2018/01/09/java/jsons.html
> >
> > Best,
> > -----------------------------------
> > Xiangdong Huang
> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >
> > 黄向东
> > 清华大学 软件学院
> >
> >
> > yuqi (Jira) <ji...@apache.org> 于2020年9月13日周日 上午10:57写道：
> >
> > >
> > > [
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17194919#comment-17194919
> > > ]
> > >
> > > yuqi commented on IOTDB-892:
> > > ----------------------------
> > >
> > > > I know this year there is a hot bug in fastjson as it may deserialize
> > > some harmful beans
> > >
> > > I do think this reason is enough to abandon fastjosn if 's buggy and
> need
> > > to be frequently updated.
> > > stable and reliable is more than the so called 'fast', that is why
> > > fastjson is rarely used in the apache soft word
> > >
> > > If you do not mind updating the version of fastjson, ignore this issue
> > > anyhow...
> > >
> > > > Replace fastjson with Gson
> > > > --------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Key: IOTDB-892
> > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-892
> > > > Project: Apache IoTDB
> > > > Issue Type: Bug
> > > > Reporter: yuqi
> > > > Priority: Critical
> > > > Labels: pull-request-available
> > > >
> > > > As fas as we know, fastjson is not stable and unreliable, So, we
> should
> > > remove fast json dependency
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> > > (v8.3.4#803005)
> > >
> >
>
Re: [jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-892) Replace fastjson with Gson
Posted by Qi Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Both jackson and gson is to OK i think, the initial aim of this issue is
to remove fastjson dependency and we will not pay to much time on the bug
track of fastjson latter.
Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月13日周日 上午11:03写道：
> Hi,
>
> > If you do not mind updating the version of fastjson, ignore this issue
> anyhow...
>
> it does not depend on my favor, but which is more suitable..
>
> I just googled some reports and yes many reports say "fastjson devotes to
> the speed but sacrifices many checks"...
>
> So how about Jackson? Sounds it is faster than Gson and stable enough [1]
> [2] (two Chinese blogs)?
>
> [1] https://segmentfault.com/a/1190000020504347
> [2] https://www.xncoding.com/2018/01/09/java/jsons.html
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
>
> yuqi (Jira) <ji...@apache.org> 于2020年9月13日周日 上午10:57写道：
>
> >
> > [
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17194919#comment-17194919
> > ]
> >
> > yuqi commented on IOTDB-892:
> > ----------------------------
> >
> > > I know this year there is a hot bug in fastjson as it may deserialize
> > some harmful beans
> >
> > I do think this reason is enough to abandon fastjosn if 's buggy and need
> > to be frequently updated.
> > stable and reliable is more than the so called 'fast', that is why
> > fastjson is rarely used in the apache soft word
> >
> > If you do not mind updating the version of fastjson, ignore this issue
> > anyhow...
> >
> > > Replace fastjson with Gson
> > > --------------------------
> > >
> > > Key: IOTDB-892
> > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-892
> > > Project: Apache IoTDB
> > > Issue Type: Bug
> > > Reporter: yuqi
> > > Priority: Critical
> > > Labels: pull-request-available
> > >
> > > As fas as we know, fastjson is not stable and unreliable, So, we should
> > remove fast json dependency
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> > (v8.3.4#803005)
> >
>